[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 7 KB, 225x225, nitsch.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14732182 No.14732182 [Reply] [Original]

This guy helped create some of the worst political philosophies of the later centuries as well as contribute to the postmodern bugman bullshit that's happening currently. What the fuck was wrong with him?

>> No.14732193

>>14732182
Based illiterate.. only emotion is indignation. Dopamine addiction

>> No.14732194

>>14725215

>> No.14732198

This poster created the worst thread of the day: >14732182. What the fuck was wrong with him?

>> No.14732222
File: 430 KB, 1280x720, pewdiepie guenon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14732222

>>14732198
In post-actuality refuted by ascended Sankt Guenon (pbuh)

>> No.14732236

Neckbeard with a power fantasy. He, nonetheless, discovered much of what present psychology has become. His insights are a necessary part of philosophy. While he is not the epitome of this field, he stands as one of the most important. We need him when there are those who abandon Christianity and require a system of morality outside of Christian doctrine.

Nietzsche is an ubermensche Chad representing a high point of Western philosophy. He have his life over to what he had discovered and deserves recognition.

>> No.14732345
File: 38 KB, 362x346, q.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14732345

>>14732193
Are you retarded?

>> No.14733572

>>14732182
It’s not him, it’s his audience. A philosophy such as Nietzche’s is prone to misinterpretation and distortion. Have you heard of the Leopold and Loeb murder case?

>> No.14733586

>>14732182

He didn't 'create' any political philosophy. His work is descriptive, rather than normative or moral.

>>14732193

Also probably this.

>> No.14733589

>>14733572

>Leopold and Loeb murder case

I haven't but it sounds like a knock-knock joke.
>Two Germans with funny names walk into a bar
>One leaves
Did Leo Loeb the other guy's head off?

>> No.14733609

>>14733589
Kek but seriously it’s an interesting. Leopold and Loeb were college students that read Nietzche and convinced themselves that they were ubermensches and thought they could pull of the perfect crime and never get caught. Eventually this idea came to fruition and they murdered another student, but eventually got caught when one of them flipped (I believe). It’s an interesting piece of history that goes to show you that philosophers and artists give bad people good ideas, and sometimes vice versa.

>> No.14733797
File: 121 KB, 720x683, 1579013306794.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14733797

>>14732182
>Worst political philosophies
Such as?

>> No.14733854

>>14732182
Can you post some excerpts or substance to your posts? And not base your opinion of Nietzsche off your thread ad populum?

>> No.14733883

please just get off this board and never come back

>> No.14734075

>>14733609

Just checked it out, yikes. Talk about missing the point.

>> No.14734130

>>14733609
Sounds like those cucks should've read Dostoevsky instead.

>> No.14734165

>>14734130

They would've sown hatchets into their coats. Some people are just morons.

>> No.14734197

Nietzsche was a proto-Nazi.

>> No.14734204

Perhaps Nietzsche's fatal flaw was that he was a poet rather than a philosopher.

In his work we are liable to see what we wish to see, and as his discussions often revolved around power, will, etc. without prescribing any code for the use of such things.

Clearly, then Nietzsche's work is in opposition to a lawful society, and can incite terrible acts in those who would use his words as an excuse. It's a simple matter to misinterpret the signs in a cup of tea leaves.

>> No.14734247

>>14734197
Or proto-conservative revolutionary

>> No.14734249

>>14734247
he was definitely some kind of precursor to fascism
>inb4 Nietzsche hated anti-semitism and german nationalism

>> No.14734359

>>14734249
>>14734197

Nietzsche's work is descriptive. What you think all of it wouldn't have happened had it not been for Nietzsche's books? The term Übermensch would not have been used, granted, but get real, history is not that simple.

>> No.14734364

>>14734359
>What you think all of it wouldn't have happened had it not been for Nietzsche's books?
Pretty much yeah. He gave it a the clarity it needed.

>> No.14734411

>>14734364

I think all I have to say to that is : ok lul

>> No.14734414

>>14732182
See
>>14732198

>>14734204
>Clearly, then Nietzsche's work is in opposition to a lawful society,
>”We have discovered happiness” — say the Bug Men, and they blink.”

>>14734249
>precursor to fascism
Shot-calling the trajectory in Nihilism, as far as foreseeing the colonial powers cannibalize themselves for fuck all for the benefit [late work] of a phillistine international finance oligarchy [early fears remarking on the development of nascent socialism, anarchism and feminism] -- none of it can be seen as an endorsement, except insofar as goading mankind to the effect that pushing deeper into decadence headlong may be the only way through and beyond (stacking bodies to reach the citadel, or cross the chasm)

>> No.14735236

>>14732182
He predicted those ideologies and their horrendous consequences, why do you think he had that entire "God is dead!" trope?

>> No.14735574

>>14734197
He would have been had they been French. German, though? No, not at all. They were everything he criticized in the Wagnerian antisemitic crowd during his lifetime: crude, volkisch, arrogant, alcoholic, non-Faustian Christian barbarians.

>> No.14735597

>>14732182
Op is Jewish. Exposed and therefore owned

>> No.14735631
File: 631 KB, 500x493, brainlet.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14735631

>>14734364
>Pretty much yeah. He gave it a the clarity it needed.

>> No.14735698

>>14732182
https://discord.gg/S3wgAr

>> No.14735776

>>14735597
Why would the jews hate Nietzsche when he was explicitly an anti-anti-semite?

>> No.14735846

>>14732182
I've read and understood calculus books in less time than anything he's written. I had to read a sentence and then sit for ten minutes trying to decipher wtf is meant/implied/alluded to. Why the fuck did he write like this? Why all the beating around the bush and cryptic language? Was he just a charlatan?

>> No.14735890

>>14735846
There are some passages in Zarathrustra that are like this. But like an earlier anon said, he has a poetic styling and an addiction to wordplay that can leave the reader to ascertain many different interpretations. There are more grounded passages in Zarathrustra though. An example would be Flies of The Marketplace