[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 388 KB, 1600x1440, c080ed91565eb49a68a19dc28af03131.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14627871 No.14627871 [Reply] [Original]

How do Tedfags feel about the fact that his work was founded upon a mistranslation of Ellul's Technique into Technology in general?

>> No.14627942

>>14627871
mistakes to miracles

>> No.14628090

Imagine trying to sow divisiveness among the audience of two authors who produced the exact same works. TK and Ellul are the SAME. Their analysis are 100% similar.

You are the perfect example of an oversocialized weakling who MUST read academia-approved authors else he goes into full meltdown because his morality stops him from engaging with anything that was not neutered by the system. Off yourself pathetic poseur, you're obviously not interested in neither Ellul or TK, but in palliating your own psychological imbalances. Which is where TK excels and Ellul falls short; the critique of useless systemic thinkers who are nothing but fragile and domesticated swines who will 100% turn their back on the anti-tech movement the moment their lives and the system are at stake. You are a disgrace to both authors.

>> No.14628103

>>14628090
Based

>> No.14628108
File: 61 KB, 634x435, Ted smile.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14628108

>>14628090
based

>> No.14628115

>>14627871
How do Tedfags and Ellulfags feel about the fact that Lewis Mumford diagnosed the problems connected to industrialism and technology firstly and more eloquently?

>> No.14628246

>>14628090
get a load of this guy

>> No.14628591

>>14627871
I have read Ellul's Propaganda and was Extremely based, how's this one?

>> No.14628751

>>14627871
A shallow thinker. Read one good book in your life.

>> No.14628756
File: 198 KB, 644x800, 1554705714352.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14628756

>Imagine trying to sow divisiveness among the audience of two authors who produced the exact same works. TK and Ellul are the SAME. Their analysis are 100% similar.
>You are the perfect example of an oversocialized weakling who MUST read academia-approved authors else he goes into full meltdown because his morality stops him from engaging with anything that was not neutered by the system. Off yourself pathetic poseur, you're obviously not interested in neither Ellul or TK, but in palliating your own psychological imbalances. Which is where TK excels and Ellul falls short; the critique of useless systemic thinkers who are nothing but fragile and domesticated swines who will 100% turn their back on the anti-tech movement the moment their lives and the system are at stake. You are a disgrace to both authors.

>> No.14628996
File: 59 KB, 750x717, ted kaczynski ideas worth spreading].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14628996

>>14628090
based and unequivocally redpilled

>> No.14629010

>>14628090
>you're obviously not interested in neither
>he uses double negation
stopped reading right there