/lit/ - Literature

Because it shows that right-wingers are not all dumb bigots.

>>14518853
???

It confirms that

Delicious Tacos isn't right-wing

>>14518834
idk, does it? you just watching the retards, you want to discuss the meaning of the retards? please move on from watching them.

>>14518834
Same reason the reflexive opposite is true.

Ya dumb ideologue.

>>14518853
???

>>14518834
“Seeth”? Eye rolling isn’t “seething”

>right wing literature

>>14518834
ive never heard of any left winger that actually read any real right wing literature ie not twitter personality shovelled out shit or edgy nazi fanfic

>>14518834
delicious tacos is not right wing lol

>>14518834
Alright guys i'm going to be honest: I don't like Jews. That all, I just don't like them. I mean, why should I? There's no reason why I should like jews, and so I don't. If there was a reason to like jews, I'd probably like them. But there isn't so I don't. Not one bit. I mean, Jews?--yeah, I'm not a big fan. It's not like I hate jews, i just don't like jews. I don't think i will ever like jews, either. Though I can see myself hating them, one day. Maybe, eventually, gradually. But for now, I just don't like jews. There are people I like and people I don't, and jews fall into the latter rather than the former category. The people that I do like?, well, they aren't jews. Jews just aren't my thing. My cup of coffee. You know that song that lists all the things you like? Like raindrops on roses and whiskers on kittens; brown copper kettles and warm woolen mittens? Yeah well, you'll notice that jews aren't on the list. It's not a surprise, really. Now that I think about it, I haven't met a single person who actually likes jews. I've met a few who hate jews, a few who are indifferent, but never someone who said 'oh yeah man i like jews jews are great.' not a single person. does anybody like jews? well i don't like them. it's not really anything more than that. I just don't like jews.

>doesn't even post Harrasment Architecture

DT isn’t right wing you dolt

>>14518834
Clockwise from top left: Pseud/ literally who/ Right wing paranoiac/ fascist in denial (if you want to find fourth ideology asian communitarianism is the way to go)/ actually ok/ literally who?

>>14519660
You type nigger a lot for someone who wants to grandstand.

>>14520269
Turner Diaries is the best book of all time.

>>14518834
Is the turner diaries entertaining at all?
Could it be read just for enjoyment and no political reasons?

>>14519746
This is unbelievably based

>>14519746
This sounds like a Jewish dialectic with the subject swapped for another. Not that that's a bad thing.

>>14519746
That's a pretty honest take, alt-larpism is based on feelings, not facts

The Right might were a respectable intellectual space a long time ago, but nowadays it is 100% pseudointellectual trash. It is no accident that there is no good right wing literature today, the ideology is so pathetic that it cannot creatively inspire anything. Conservatives are now reduced to complaining about video games being too progressive because they lack the talent to make their own shit.

>>14520269
Camp of the saints is the best, the turner diaries is a fun larp amd the rest are for midwit unlearned retards.

>>14518834
Contrary to the entirety of history, jews believe that the arts are now their domain.
They get mad when anyone encroaches on what they believe is theirs.
>Arts and Entertainment
>Media
>Academia
>Activism
>Culture
>Government
>Etc etc

Do people actually think readers will take them seriously if they choose middleschool level pen names like Delicious Tacos or Bronze Age Pervert? What's the big idea, are these guys literally retarded?

>>14521899
>are these guys literally retarded?
So what if they are? Are you some kind of ableist?

>>14518834
Why is nationalism/racism associated with "right wing" now?

>>14521948
>now
Since forever. I was raised christian conservative but not racist. My mom like MLK, though never talked about his overt socialist tendencies. But the racists and nationalists have always been a part of the rightwing, even when they were a part of the Democratic party they were considered rightwing.

>>14520523
Stfu

>>14521991
>Since forever.
No. The original leftists were closer to nationalism than the rightists
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Revolution

>>14521844
That pic is can be summed up in a tl;dr as toll paid.

>>14521948
Pretty much always. The only time nationalism was a step forward was in the age of Napoleon.

>>14519029
Seething

>>14518834
Hey Tacos, I'm not buying your book you sex addict. Write something other than you being an horny ape over and over

>>14522023
For wanting a republic instead of a kingdom or empire?
The project for freedom was attractive to many. The needs began to define themselves for groups and republics became pretty lacking for those on the “left” and so we get socialism. Rightwinger either cling to god and king or Napoleon or German speaking peoples or pan-slovacism or w/e. The reactionary to the revolutionary. Since forever

>>14519746
Is this a Sam Hyde skit?

>>14522071
Why was it a step forward then, but not now?
Should nations not exist and have some kind of autonomy?

>>14522118
>For wanting a republic instead of a kingdom or empire?
Exactly. You either want a republic or you're going to be ruled by someone who acquired power in other ways. Back then it was kings, now it's more likely to be big corporations. For example companies like Google and Apple already have a lot of influence on the population in terms of ideology.

For the same reason I don't like shit rubbed in my face.

>>14522226
Which ones didn't you enjoy?

>>14522238
I attempted to read that one called, I believe, The Way of Men. Seemed to completely disregard what we know about everything and went in to a weird mythical and falsely hyper-masculine fantasy. I think that was the book.

>>14522261
Read The Turner Diaries, it's fun. If you're a lefty, the race stuff is laugh out loud funny.

>>14520596
>>14520523
No, it's crap.

If you really want to read great right wing literature, check out "As I walk these broken roads" by Davis MJ Aurini

>>14522310
Redpill on this

>>14522317
The book is really pleasant to read (unless you need non-stop break-neck action). And Aurini manages to depict a failed world without indulging in the vicious pessimism that is so common in post-apocalyptic stories. To his credit Aurini also avoids the temptation to graphically exploit the abuses perpetrated by the evildoers. This story is not a sadistic warning about how bad things can get if we don’t do things right but rather about how much can be accomplished even when all seems lost.

>>14522317
Set in post-apocalyptic Ontario, the book opens with a very Western feel. A laconic stranger walks into a small isolated town. Village of Blackstock, Population 800. He quickly gets acquainted with the bartender and the town’s mechanic. Nobody knows the armed newcomer but soon there is someone spreading rumors about him.

>>14522317
His characters are believable: even his villains are given humanity. Finally, Aurini explores themes of masculinity and philosophy in a subtle, understated way; you’ll never feel like he’s giving you a lecture.

Remember 2009-2011 when lit was obsessed with economics. Then 2012-2014 when it was about fringe occultism. Then 2015-2017 when it was all about race and history. Then 2018-2019 when it's religion and politics.

Yeah you're mainstream. Yes you.

>>14522160
At first serfs were excited by the idea, but the industrialized towns they had to move to in order to get work made them rethink their stance.
It isn’t as clear cut as left and right, this is just a shorthand term, a generalization.
So yes, some lefties had prejudices, but they’re self correcting by nature. Castro apologized to the lgbt of Cuba in 1979 for past policy and general discrimination. And though I dislike state-socialism, like in Cuba, and I see it as a failure, they’ *internationalists* not nationalists

>>14522449
>they’ *internationalists* not nationalists

You can't have internationalism without nationalism.
If you remove nation states you're going to end up with globalism, a capitalist's wet dream.

*blocks your (((whiteoid))) path*

I couldn't even begin to give less of a shit about any of the books in that pic. Post some fucking Junger or Schmitt and you might have an argument.

t. Lefty

>>14522487
First. That’s not what “globalism” generally means.
Nationalism is about chauvinism, and racial supremacists, often leading to expulsions of perceived Others, and often wars.
State-socialist internationalism is supposed to be a globe of workers states respecting and cooperating with one another.
Libertarian paradise is a globe of benign borders that anyone can cross because they just represent named places on a map. I believe it would make things tricky and even dangerous, but I like the idea anyway.
>quotes tanky
Didn’t read. I don’t care about the Kims

>>14522633
and the third-world don't care about a privileged cracker labor aristocrat like yourself

you profit off of the oppression of workers in the third-world and have 0 revolutionary potential.

shut the fuck up

>>14522633
>Nationalism is about chauvinism, and racial supremacists
It's also about solidarity with your fellow people.
I can't understand so called "leftists" who want to build a more compassionate society with higher taxes or even socialism, but at the same time shun nationalism. National unity is the easiest--if not the only--path towards socialism.
If your country is just a bunch of people who came here for a higher wage, united by nothing, you won't have a nation and you won't have solidarity.

>>14518834
Started Bronze Age Mindset. The author should go by Stone Age Pervert since the broken English is Grog-tier throughout the entire book. I had hoped that there was some meaningful to glean from it because it has quite a bit of praise but there was none to be had. I've noticed a major appeal of so-called right wing "literature" is the topic of masculinity and I think society (typically on the right) is really looking for a serious discussion about it, but books like BAM are only valuable in their emotional content. The intellectual content is entirely based around straw men and unsupported ideas. It reads like a ranting post on /x/ or /pol/ (the two lowest IQ boards on this God forsaken website) with worse then usual English. Its full of literal meme terminology and meme ideology. Reading this has really enlightened me to the desperate position a lot of posters here actually take considering the books popularity. It is probably more enjoyable than reading any pop trash from Huffington Post authors, but it's truly a case study in the deficiencies of the modern right. Sad.

>>14522989
I haven't read it and won't read it, but it seems the intention of the book is to collect confused and lost white males and provide some coherent vision for the past and into the future, not to impress word snobs.
The target audience is unlikely to really read at all. The meme language used to attract people who don't read.

>>14522822
I think he is probably referring to modern nationalism. The meaning of nationalism has been raped in the last decade or so by the right and left (two other words who's meanings were raped into oblivion). Nationalism is almost all cases in the modern world is related to supremacy and is this anti-unity. This is because nationalists by and large direct their affirmations of group solidarity against those who are considered inferior. For example, most American Nationalists these days have nothing but contempt for over half of Americans, usually having very thin definitions of what they consider to be American.

>>14523048
Let me give you an excerpt. It's not a word snob thing, it's a basic literacy thing. It is quite literally written in broken English.

>3
The most noble animals refuse to breed in captivity. Many animal, not just man, choose death when trapped. But I thought all life strove for mere survival and reproduction; but this not enough? But if not enough then must understand animal in some other way. Very much when thinkers talk about “evolutionary psychology” they abstract from way of yeast to way of animals and man, but this is backward.

Grog have big think.

Academia is afraid of physical violence so refuses to engage with right wing ideas thereby never giving their air or allowing them to develop. This is because the western academy doesn't speak Russian or Chinese and is historically illiterate about those regions and their political, social, philosophical veins. They idealise the unknown creating a type of nouveau savage out of Eurasia and going tut tut at European romanticism and nationalism.

>t. Chink

>>14519746
Nobody likes Jews en masse, not even Jews. But individuals I judge as individuals.

>>14523085
Yeah there's no chance I'm reading that writing for however many pages, but it seems that through his affected language he still gets his ideas across. Style is a choice, in other words. He doesn't seem to be failing.
Maybe this is more about linguistics than grammar.

>>14522762
>labor aristocra
Literally nothing
>silence, Mac user. Let the neoliberal elite run things. You will never amount to anything. Shutupshutupshutup

>>14523094
Not quite, Chinese are viewed more as ayylmaos than noble savages imo. As in, they're "civilized" but neither Western nor part of the Global Child (Muslims, Africans, Indios). Slavs are if anything lower than Chinese because they are European and thus ought to "know better" than to be nationalist or whatever, as compared to the Chinese. Slavs occupy the same headspace on the world stage as rednecks do domestically for American Progressives, basically.

>>14518834
The only one I don’t like is the Turner Dairies because it’s unrealistic

>>14520406
There’s probably around 5 people imitating here right now. The real margarine mosquito doesn’t use language like that.

>>14523793
her*

>>14523205
> cracker wanting to silence third-world minorities

gee, what a surprise

>>14523693
rofl you are living it as we speak apparently you just don't have have the wherewithal to realize it

>Turner Diaries
>literature
You clearly haven't read it.
Harold Covington managed to create a more readable /pol/nigger jerk-off fantasy. He was at least able to give non-white and non-racist characters actual personalities and motivations and even make them occasionally sympathetic unlike Pierce. But even that got boring after a while.
>>14524778
>trolling the US and USSR into a nuclear war and somehow using this to take over the world completely unexplained is 'realistic'