[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 756 KB, 1148x658, 1570900046106[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13980131 No.13980131 [Reply] [Original]

Are there any fiction books that deal realistically with a climate change-induced transformation of society into one with less freedom, mobility, and wealth?

>> No.13980283

bump please

>> No.13980291

>it's up to you, the common folks, to solve this problem ;)
>flies his private jet just to get a burger in New York

>> No.13980846

Yes, everything Kaczynski has written.

>> No.13980855

Ah fiction, my bad.

>> No.13980889
File: 39 KB, 200x326, 2943A25C-1EFB-47E4-ABC2-166E7653207E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13980889

>>13980131
I’m working on one.
What a shit chart. Jets are going to fly no matter what. It’s a for-profit industry and a modern convenience people take advantage of. They could have put up “Stop all formula 1 stock-car racing”. Or even “Eat less meat”, fucking sick of these militant vegans

A new socialist fiction trend is needed. It doesn’t have to have less freedom and “wealth”

>> No.13980918

>>13980889
I hate you so fucking much butterfly
>a new socialist fiction is needed where people are free and wealthy
why don't you take the time to read Marx instead?

>> No.13980953

https://zerohplovecraft.wordpress.com/2019/09/28/the-green-new-deal/ read this

>> No.13980977
File: 32 KB, 334x499, BEB93AE0-F879-4274-A5DB-F96A6203BB52.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13980977

>>13980918
Because I don’t need to.
I’m not going to read Lenin or Stalin either
Again, we don’t have to give up freedom and (actual) wealth to preserve our environment. We have to increase it by getting rid of capitalism and statism.

>> No.13981067

>>13980953
Sometimes a little too on the nose but that was a decent read in line with what OP asked for, thanks.

>> No.13981077
File: 153 KB, 800x421, cormac[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13981077

>>13980131
The Road.

>> No.13981082

>>13980131
the death of grass by john christopher

>hang dry clothes
what does that even mean? is folding clothes harmful to the environment now?

>> No.13981138

>>13981082
It means "hang dry" your clothes instead of throwing them in a machine dryer, brainlet.

>> No.13981318

>>13980131
brb having 12 kids.

>> No.13981328

>>13981138
oh it's an american bastardisation

>> No.13981330

>>13980131
the world made by hand novels. very comfy, but don't expect high brow literature

>> No.13981419

>>13980977
>what if a cooperative voted to pollute the environment?

>> No.13981432

>>13981419
Why would it though? Why would people vote for their own destruction? Without capitalism they couldn't profit from it, so their would be on incentive to destroy.

>> No.13981467

>>13980131
Jean Rapail - Camp of the Saints

>> No.13981478

>>13980846
That guy was really as close to a prophet as we will ever see. Why did he have to go and be a terrorist?

>> No.13981592

>>13981478
You would never have read him otherwise.

>> No.13981615 [DELETED] 

>>13980977
Imagine how illiterate one would have to be to conflate Marx, Lenin, and Stalin. Your darling Bakunin thought Capital a worthwhile read, by the way. So much so that he translated it into Russian. At least read ten pages of Maximilien Rubel or Hal Draper so you won’t embarrass yourself this much in the future.

>> No.13981633

>>13980291
do people think this is an argument

>> No.13981700

>>13981330
>the world made by hand
Hmm. Sounded like it could have been good. Just what the OP is asking for, but it sounds poorly executed.

>>13981419
Yeah, what if a cooperative voted to poison their own water supply. Good thinking, male-anon. Maybe we need a king to put that sort of thing in check. Just in case.

>>13981633
It has a point, but not to go on with business as usual.

>> No.13981717

>>13981700
Did you want to slam your pussy onto my cock? :3

>> No.13981719

>>13981432
>Why would people vote for their own destruction?
because people can be in thrall to charismatic leaders who do not have their best interests at heart. jim jones, david koresh, marshall applewhite. donald trump.

>> No.13981763

>>13981717
No, but I’d slam a hammer into you

>>13981719
Which is why we need to wipe away religious zealotry. 99% of people would adapt to a decentralized democracy favorably, because they will naturally not want to poison their water. The majority would win out. Say a minority of muslims disapproves of the secularist schools and general population. They would get up and move away to more muslim areas.

>> No.13981785

>>13981763
Bullshit. You need what I'm about to give you.

You are dropping everything and masturbating to the thought of me right now :3

Time to relieve yourself of all pressure.

>> No.13982869

Wasn't Soilent Green a novel before it was a movie?

>> No.13983043

>>13980131
The study which states that having one less child decreases carbon emissions dramatically is measuring the "carbon legacy" over 5 centuries of every generation that child would spawn, according to contemporary consumption habits and technology. It's fucking retarded.

>> No.13983047

>>13981318
So they can die in a post global warming hell?