/lit/ - Literature

Henry David Thoreau

>>13807131
moses, now go read the bible already. also evola was a pussy lol moses would've smashed him in a fight and evola was known to use a butt plug lmaooo cringe

>>13807137
>Henry David Thoreau
a.k.a 18th century antifa

>>13807144
say whaaatt

>>13807131
Carlyle by far. Carlyle was a fucking genius, both in his understanding of society and the incredible prose he wrote.

Richard Filmer, Joseph de Maistre, any of the Russophiles.

>>13807181
His Puritan beliefs held him back

>list of literal whos

>>13807220
what do you mean specifically? I never got the impression he even really cared about religion that much, he was all about philosophy and politics and history. That shit about 'the christian religion i hope is nothing but hatred for scoundrels'(paraphrasing) and 'Can a man sail past the cape or can he not, that is what matters, not counting of heads'(again paraphrasing) seems pretty clear to me.

>>13807149
Anon wants maximum bootlicking here. Not some crazy radical that wants peace and freedom

The Master.

>>13807280
this guy clearly has NPD

>>13807131
Plato.

>>13807131
Teddy Roosevelt

>>13807300
t. Incapable of beating the master

>>13807131
Who's at the bottom of the chart?

>>13807244
shoo shoo
>>>/fa/
there you can go talkie talk about your newest shoes, woman

>>13807280
Not an argument.

>>13807131
Baudelaire

Jordan Beterson

>>13807131
Could somebody tell me who all those people are?

>>13807300
He certainly has something.

Who are number 1, 4, 5 and 6 ?

If the majority of people here only plan on perusing literature for selfish reasons, or composing incompetent, if not offensive, attempts at it, what is the divine value of its existence?

bump

>>13807280
To be honest (and I think Molymeme is a low IQ charlatan) I think this story could have some truth to it, and he probably is a fantastic debater. His "educational" background is in theater, he's naturally going to be far better at winning over a crowd than a bunch of stuff debate club goons

>>13807131
Give their name please !
Isn't the last Belarmin ? The second and the third are Guenon and Evola but after that...
As a guenon fanboy I have to say this list is dumb, be these list are made to be ironic so maybe, I don't know the first one.

>>13807131
FRANCIS PARKER YOCKEY

>>13809593
>The Washington regime’s leading internal thesis-which has not changed since 1933-is that Americans must be “tolerant” of the alien elements (which now number roughly 50% of the population), since, after all, these aliens are “brothers.” “Brotherhood” is glorified on all public occasions, by all public officials, is taught in the schools and preached in the churches, which have been coordinated into the master-plan of the Culturally-alien Washington regime.

>Newspapers, books, magazines, radio, television, films-all vomit forth the same “Brotherhood.” The “Brotherhood” propaganda is a ghastly caricature of the Christian idea of the Fatherhood of God and the Brotherhood of Man, but there is no religious intent to the propaganda. Its sole purpose is to destroy whatever exclusiveness, national feelings, or racial instincts may still remain in the American population after twenty years of national leprosy. The result of the
“tolerance” and “brotherhood” campaign is that the alien enjoys a superior position in America-he can demand to be “tolerated.” The American can demand nothing. The tragic fact is that the attenuation of the national instincts has proceeded so far that one cannot envisage how a Nationalist Revolution would be even possible in America.

>>13807131
Can someone tell me who all of these people are?

>>13809624
2. Guénon 3. Evola
the last is Belarmin, a papist jesuit who helped the vatican (of the pope being the boss) ideology to extend even more. So he is liked, maybe also because he was in the inquisition.

>>13809710
Guenon is the best in this list but he wouldn't approve being put in a political one (he wouldn't approve the fact we care about his individuality also). Even if his followers are more right wing because traditional, the right wing isn't necessarily traditional. Moreover he talks about spiritual things, not about politics.

>>13807280
https://youtu.be/rFgdDS-WmwU

>>13809710
>the last is Belarmin
Can't find many books written by him, which books should I read ?

>>13809624
Some KKK leader? - Guenon - Santayana (or Evola?) - ? - Belloc - ?

>>13809822
none. You should read Guenon, "the crisis of the modern world".

>>13807300
More likely autism

first modern right-winger, best modern right-winger.

>>13809870
already read that anon

>>13807131
In a way, Xenophon.

>>13807131
Why do you hate people so much?

>>13810093
fuck off faggot

Karl Marx. Prove me wrong

G. K. Chesterton

>>13809996
That's good. You should continue if you are capable of doing so. Read about initiation and find a tradition that is alive (i.e orthodoxy)

L Ron Hubbard

>>13810542
was a black man

Why is capitalism considered right wing and socialism considered left wing? Shouldn't it be the opposite? Capitalism leads to the global society and loss of traditional values.

>>13810472
I don't want to anon, I want to know about Belarmin.

Tolkien just means elves with +dex and orcs with +str and Lovecraft means Cthulhu, the alien that wants to eat you, and Moldbug is just a fascist calling for the merger of corporate and state power, and Jim isn’t a nazi because he hates white people and likes Jews and basically just has an ax to grind about women because some were affirmative actioned into his company. What we really need is professors to encourage the young lords to think! like in that carpe diem movie with the weird suicide kid.

>>13807131
>>13808268
People like this aren’t interested in critical thinking and increasing their level of understanding only subsuming pre-packaged beliefs that require no input from their part, aside from pressing play on the DVD player in their mind and regurgitating said belief when appropriate to own the libs or whomever.

>>13810640
This is an American thing. America doesn't really have a right wing in the capital, and the actual left wing isn't particularly potent. This will change based on country, and what's liberal and conservative is dependent on what's being liberalized or conserved.
American politics, and I mean actual government, legislation, and lobbies, is materialistic in nature. There are some aggrandized examples of moral and philosophical ideologues leaking in, and that's mostly progressive globalist thinking seeping in with immigration and abortion, but for the most part, it's all about money and things.
The right wing is associated with order, hierarchy, social cohesion, and thus, traditions.
Because it's about money now, and nothing else, discussion of cultural and philosophical value are given only a little concession, and most of that is to the social justice and critical theory crowd, and a little bit to the Christians.
Both sides don't give any functional care for the actual cultural state of the nation, in the capital. They just pay lip service while the people that do care do their thing. It's all about taxes, healthcare programs, welfare, and regulations. Both sides calmor about how many jobs everyone has and how they'll get healthcare. They both only care about money, they just want to use it different ways. The closest thing to traditionalists in government are economic libertarians who are "constitutional." The Constitution is simply a null and void document. The government practices limitless surveillance. The government does not give speedy trials, and it frequently kills and imprisons individuals without a public trial at all (through the alphabet agencies), and gives excessive bail and fines. The 10th amendment is openly violated.

>>13810640
In my country at least, the liberals (I guess Americans would call them classical liberals or something like that, I mean the capitalistic right) and the catholics were the two big parties until WW1. The catholics were the working class people and called right wing and the liberals were the bourgeoisie and called left wing. Then socialism appeared and was at first just the most-left part of the liberal party, and then evolved into its own movement. With the disappearance of the catholics, the liberals started being called right wing and the socialists left wing. Funnily enough, the liberals were openly free-mason until the catholics started to become irrelevant, I guess they achieved their goal.

>>13810386
Cant Marxism is objectively a right wing ideology and only brainlets disagree

>>13810901
what country

You can skip the rest

>>13809822
I think you would be better off reading about the council of trent since he was a part of it.
He did make his own catechism in response to it, but it seems he also made many books reaffirming church teachings.

> the only value anything has is how much human labor it's worth
> the aristocracy is decadent and the bourgeoisie industrious
> class antagonism of aristocrats wanting to steal from their peasants can only be held back by a strong central figure
> since it ceased in the hands of the German to express the struggle of one class with the other, he felt conscious of having overcome “French one-sidedness” and of representing, not true requirements, but the requirements of Truth; not the interests of the proletariat, but the interests of Human Nature, of Man in general, who belongs to no class, has no reality, who exists only in the misty realm of philosophical fantasy... The fight of the Germans, and especially of the Prussian bourgeoisie, against feudal aristocracy and absolute monarchy, in other words, the liberal movement, became more earnest.
> A part of the bourgeoisie is desirous of redressing social grievances in order to secure the continued existence of bourgeois society.

To this section belong economists, philanthropists, humanitarians, improvers of the condition of the working class, organisers of charity, members of societies for the prevention of cruelty to animals, temperance fanatics, hole-and-corner reformers of every imaginable kind... Free trade: for the benefit of the working class. Protective duties: for the benefit of the working class. Prison Reform: for the benefit of the working class. This is the last word and the only seriously meant word of bourgeois socialism. It is summed up in the phrase: the bourgeois is a bourgeois — for the benefit of the working class.

>>13807300
Not an argument

>>13811237
>A part of the bourgeoisie is desirous of redressing social grievances in order to secure the continued existence of bourgeois society.
Unironically the cückiest thing i have ever read

>>13811167

>>13807131
De Maistre

>>13807221
Yeah, I only recognize Guenon and Evola.

>>13807131
Plato

Waiting for Zizek to denounce Marx/Hegel, quit cocaine and convert to Christ.

>no Serrano.

What a shit thread...

Heidegger or Kant

Adolf Hitler

>>13808268
>>13810823
kek, faggots

>>13813134
You're clearly not familiar with Hegel, are you? If he became a Christian, there would be no need to denounce Hegel.

>>13807131
Bossuet is pretty based.