/lit/ - Literature

>>13725190
None.

>>13725205
/Thread closed.

>>13725190
The Natural Superiority of the Left-Hander James T. De Kay

Das Kapital
Anti-Oedipus
A Thousand Plateaus
Society Must Be Defended
Security, Territory, Population
The Birth of Biopolitics
Society of the Spectacle
The Culture Industry
Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism
Cosmopolitics
Psychopolitics
The Burnout Society

A book on basic economics so you can stop being a brainlet leftie.

>>13725190
The conquest of bread

>>13725190
my diary desu

The talmud and the 2030 UN Agenda

>>13725262
This.
Micro and macro though, so you can continually annoy right wingers with the fact that economists have a neoclassical+keynesian synthesis as the orthodoxy.

>>13725228
>tfw i've always been secretly jealous of left-handed people

>>13725615
>neoclassical+keynesian synthesis as the orthodoxy
Anthything but the retardation that is marxian "economics"

>>13725328
Goddamn, the Dispossessed is SO GOOD

>>13725190
Start with Rousseau and Hobbes

>>13725190
Kropotkin is pretty legit.

>>13725190
If you're white, none, whites aren't proletarian anymore, they are not exploited on net. If you're not white, then:
Pretty much everything by Marx and Engles is useful.
Everything by Lenin.
Problems of the Economics of the USSR, Foundation of Leninism and Dialectical and Historical Materialism by Stalin.
Everything by Mao is useful, but especially On Contradiction.

>>13725190
Posadas and Valerie Solanas

>>13725190
>Far Left
Pol Pot

>>13725900
>muh oppressed coloreds.
>it's the white men's fault
>f*ck capitalism.
>f*ck your european heritage
>kill whitey

>>13725947
Well yeah. Was this 1918 I wouldn't be saying whites had no revolutionary potential. But since the mid-20th century, all whites except East Germans proved beyond a doubt they are not proletariat or willing to struggle against capitalism. Why? Because now they benefit from imperialism. The capitalists bribe them with super-profits extracted from the third world. So no, whites aren't proletarian and they prove it everyday, especially on here.

>>13725623
why

>>13725962
idk it just seems more unique and special

You have to start with Rousseau, Hobbes, and Locke no matter what. You need basic liberal thought down in order to move to Hegel and Marx

The Subtle Art of not giving a ****.

>>13725190
Far left is retarded read linkola and become an eco fascist

>>13725190
Kys

Can I be great? Where do I start between mathematicians and philosophers? I have little money

>>13725190
There is no far left book worth reading other than Marx. Even so, Marx can be succinctly summarized as "capitalism exploits" without losing anything of value from the text. Typically, the more to an extremum on leans, the more one is willing to things that are intellectually disingenuous and discontinuous with reason. The far left, as a quasi ideology, is no different.

If you mean basic liberal books, read Locke, Rosseau, J.S. Mill, Kant, and so on. I'm afraid, though, that liberalism as an ideology is faltering in a number of academic areas and only exists in our form of governance to prolong exploitation.

>>13726030
>Marx can be succinctly summarized as "capitalism exploits"
Peak Dunning-Kruger.

>>13726026
Leibniz and Descartes might be a place to start

>>13726040
Marx was an Engels and Hegel system baby: a hack

>>13726030
>Has never read Marx

>>13725233
>Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism
dropped
nothing you say can be relevant.

>>13725205
fpbp

whyyyy would you...

https://speek.link/s/F92kzOf54nWiPCzsMuAN

>>13725190
whyyyy would you...

https://speek.link/s/F92kzOf54nWiPCzsMuAN

>>13725190
Testing (tv is frozen)

>>13725233

Das Kapital yes
Anti-Oedipus no
A Thousand Plateaus no
Society Must Be Defended no
Security, Territory, Population no
The Birth of Biopolitics yes
Society of the Spectacle yes
The Culture Industry no (it's literally fucking plain as daylight at this point, and you'll be able to write the idea in the same silly fucking manifesto-style imperative voice if you just take two minutes to think about Society of the Spectacle. Adorno is the Snoop Dawg to Debord. The first of a long line of pretenders.)
Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism no
Cosmopolitics can't say
Psychopolitics can't say
The Burnout Society no

Literally just Weber x Baudrillard x Kant x Marx man. Deleuze or Guattari are literally upside-down world in respect to the Hegelian dialectic. Not congruent, per se, with what one would expect out of the "far left" must-reads.

>>13725970
Rousseau the most. Absolutely the most.

>>13727035
I'm not gonna stop you from telling him to read Weber, but his sociology is almost a complete negation of Marx.

>>13727044
That's fair to say. I have no disagreement there and I think that's an insight that flew right over my head, thanks anon. I think that Weber scratches the itch for contemporary historical tethers that would otherwise be filled with shitlord Spengler. I also think that Weber informs quite a bit of McLuhan, who in turn informed Baudrillard and Virilio. I like to think as Weber as a joker-card in the "far left" reading catalog.

>>13727018
we really got faggots out here afraid of words gb2/pol/

>>13725190
>Marx
Capital
Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts
Wage Labor and Capital
The Communist Manifesto
Critique of the Gotha Program
>Engels
Socialism: Utopian and Scientific
The Origin of the Family
Anti-Duhring
>Lenin
The State and Revolution
Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism
April Thesis
What is to be Done?
Left-Communism
The Right to Self-Determination
>Mao
On Practice
On Contradiction
Analysis of the Classes in Chinese Society

>World Politics
Nkrumah's Neo-Colonialism
Fanon's The Wretched of the Earth
Hoxha's The Khrushchevites
Arghiri's Unequal Exchange

>Philosophy
Adorno's The Dialectic of Enlightenment
Althusser's For Marx
Foucault's Discipline and Punishment
Debord's The Society of the Spectacle
Zizek's Sublime Object of Ideology

>>13725963
i mean,im left handed and the only effect ive noticed is shitty handwriting and weird friction when i jack off

You should grow up and read Carl Schmitt instead.

>>13727094
is mao actually worth reading? ive read all the marx/engels/lenin you listed and i feel like i could skip mao