/lit/ - Literature

>>13382360
most people just pretend to like him because they hope it will make them appear sophisticated and different.

>>13382360
that carlton dude must have been so happy when he realized he could do another gimmick now that his bowtie gimmick got burned too hard to be used anymore: the wrinkle between eyebrows of confoundedness, concern and disdain . no arguments need to be done, nothing to be said: just flash that face and he signified something , he won.

I like Deleuze post ironically

>>13382776
He is the smartest and most important American intellectual after Moldbug (and he's gaining on him and may soon overtake him)

>>13382776
I legitimately do not understand how one can not at least respect Tucker.

>>13382360
>Understanding Deleuze unironically
also >using unironically unironically

what the fuck was deleuze even trying to say?

>>13382911
This, but unironically

>>13382886
Disgusting desu

>>13382894
don't try to understand the american thinking; it is illogical

>liking anything ironically

>>13382886
People actually think Moldbug is smart?

>>13382894
the few videos i saw of him he does the lil weasel bitch move that is typical of right wing pundit like o'riley , massive liar, deceiftul cunt. hypocritical. zero care about the truth, only games to advance his brand. cancer on intellectualism.

>>13383018
wtf I hate Tucker now?
I have no idea what the fuck you're taking about.

>>13383020
no idea at all huh no idea what the fuck i am talking about. you never saw him interrupt his guest? never heard him twist the truth to make himself look more than good. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XzbxxF95vM here's a lil treat then, begin your education on that manipulative lil sack of shit. also: good luck , usa if this is one of your leading "intellectuals".

>>13383018
Intellectualism is the cancer. Anything opposed to it in anyway is beneficial.

>>13382911
>unironically messing up a greentext attempt

>>13382886

>>13382894
he's just a corporate mouthpiece willing to "defend" even absurdities like claiming that the metric system is a globalist conspiracy to destroy america

>>13383135
>t. butthurt libtard

Are you angry that he eviscerates every leftist who has gone on his show and that now most left-wing people are scared to go on? He is the bull in the chinashop of modern political discourse, from personally averting war with Iran with a timely phonecall with President Trump, to dunking on smarmy kikes like Ben Shapiro to debunking the left's sacred cows, there is nothing he can't do.

>>13383055
He got him on his show to have him talk about an issue relevant to his show and audience and the Dutch guy came on pretending to be on board with that to then insult and disparage Tucker, for what, left wing street cred? Thank you, Dutch guy, very cool!
Advocating against predatory billionaires should be an issue leftists identify with, one they could find common ground with people like Tucker, but no, BTFOing that evil meanie is more important.
>>13383135
Referring to Tucker of all people as a corporate mouthpiece is a bit insolent, I think. And sure, he has some kooky opinions but that just comes with being American.

>>13383177
>debunking the left's sacred cows

don't just claim this, post proof

>>13383676
His version of owning the left is Carlson telling the neolib science man pollution is good. The amount of bootlicking /pol/ gives to corporations while claiming to go against the narrative is embarrassing. They are just like Google liberals

>>13382894
This is the dangers of contrarianism that you go full boomer to spite the other millennials and zoomers

>>13383714
what gave me away

>>13383013
you don't?