/lit/ - Literature

Poorly researched trash

>>13192821
Which part did you find the most disagreeable?

>>13193092
He didn't say it was disagreeable, he said it was poorly researched.

>>13193105
ESL?

>>13192821
Which part did you find poorly researched?

>>13192806
the muh illuminati stuff was annoyin when I skimmed it last, but I liked the story about the rockefeller-funded broard who misinterpreted nietzsche and turned into a retarded drug addict whore because of it.

>>13192821
Porn addict detected

roosh v likes it. BASED

>>13193213
>586. PUAs really are the ultimate feminists, for in their quest to understand the female mind they have succeeded so well that they themselves have finally become women, inasmuch as they have come to view the world entirely through feminine eyes. Finally, Roosh gathered up the gall to claim that the most important things in a man's life are money and sex. Which is precisely what women feel! (at least until they have children, at which point even women become nobler creatures than PUAs). Meanwhile, no great man in history (which is to say no REAL man) has ever thought like that, which the PUAs might have realized had they not confined their reading to rubbish self-help pamphlets and retardosphere blogs. To me for instance sex and money do not even figure in my top 10 — even videogames, which PUAs lose no opportunity to denigrate, feature far higher then sex, and certainly than money. But it is with the PUAs as with any other specialist, as I've already explained. If you pay attention to anything they say OUTSIDE their very narrow field of expertise, you are more stupid than they are, and deserve to be regaled with what to even average people in the street would strike as rank stupidity.

>>13193230

read F Roger Devlin

>>13192821
Want to know how I know you're a cum-brained porn-addict?

>>13193230
Source?

>>13192806
It has some pretty glaring flaws but it was informative and I am glad I read it.

>>13193184
You do know that the illuminati was a real group who existed for about a decade, right? It is a meme now but that is where it came from. EMJ goes over this. They were important for a brief period then no longer.

Post essential redpill reading:

Sexual Utopia in Power
The Roissy Reader
Solomon II archives
Book of YaReally
Ask TRP, TRP sidebars
TRP handbook
Game, Bang, Day Bang
NMMNG, WISNIFG
Book of Pook
Sex God Method
Rational Male and follow ups

>>13192821
Yes. Anyone with >90 IQ can see through it. E Michael Jones is a joke.
>>13193092
>>13193165
>>13193192
>>13193268
Too funny watching you getting triggered. If only your IQ were just a bit higher so you knew how stupid you look.

>>13193338
The writing style makes it clear that this post was produced in Tel Aviv. Stop being so anti-Logos

>>13193328

Models

>>13193328
Sex and Character

>>13193338
Only jews have high IQ

He needs an editor. I swear the exact same paragraphs are used multiple times.

>>13193328
you are quite honestly better off just reading a book about how evolution works, specifically a section on sociobiology as it relates to sex interactions.

>>13192806
I didn't read it, but I listened to the author on some podcast.
I don't really consider him a serious intellectual, but a few things he said were interesting. Especially the part about bonobos and how their feminized society is organized vs the chimps who are more patriarchal.

>>13193411

HBD and that stuff is related but separate. I'm talking more classic game etc.

Perhaps ironically I think EMJ's central thesis dovetails nicely with Foucault. Sexual license having become a tool and technique of control and regulation.

>>13193406
That's how you fill up a book when you have nothing to say haha. Be happy it's not randomly generated, although I doubt people who read would be able to distinguish random text from intelligent thought lmao.
>>13193395
Wrong. Low IQ post.
>>13193362
Hahaha thanks for proving my point about how low-IQ EMJ fanboys are. If I think your sugardaddy antisemitic armchair "thinker" is full of shit then surely I must be a jew (I'm not) and "anti-logos", whatever the hell that means. A prime example of a EMJ fan, everyone.

>>13193328

Roosh's old work. Wish Roissy put a book or something out

>>13193459
This is embarrassing dude. You've jerked your way into being a woman.

>>13193328
Just reading Rational Male 1 & 2 and Game by Roosh is enough, anything else is over the top
(i know, because i read all those meme books)

How did you get a copy

>>13193478
Embarrassing post dude.

>>13193328

Sex God Method is the real deal

>>13193478
Lmao

>>13193478
>aeururugughhghhghgghghgh
Have sex, incel ;)

>>13193478
the absolute state

>>13193487
>>13193495
>>13193533
>>13193542
Hello cumbrains

>>13193478
based and redpilled

>>13193562
Typical low test response
>a uh uh epic cartoon w-will show him who's boss!

>>13193593
seething roastie

Reminder that onanism is bad.

>>13193603
>laughing anime girl
Now I know to only pity you; sorry for being mean earlier, I know that life has been tough on ya

>>13193625
OH NO NO NO
Look at this seething roastie

>>13193650
I'm glad you're having some nice fun play time anon :)

>>13193562
>>13193603
>>13193650
>all his filenames start with 155
Kinda cringe, dude

>>13193669
I just got a new phone

>>13193685
>phonenigger thinks he can talk any shit to anyone
It's called a nokia, faggot

>>13193693
>muh 3310
quit larping roastie. we all know you have an iPhone X

>>13193482
I'm reading a pdf i found online

>>13193697
Shut the fuck up, kike. Nobody here is dumb enough to buy another goyphone-16 to use twitter, because nobody wants your JIDF memes blasted onto their brains.

>>13193482
>can't figure out how to find a book
Sounds like EMJ will be right up your alley! Enjoy, friend :)

>>13193736

I meant a physical copy, big boy.

>>13193744
>big boy
Aren't you intimidating? Adorable

>>13193896

adorable is a big word for you, I'm surprised

>>13193921
Surprised by what? Your posts aren't making any posts, moron. Perhaps English is not your first language? Or might it be simple brainletism?

>>13192806
>Libido Dominandi is the first draft of a great work. As it is, it is a failure, suffering from shoddy writing, poor research, and a wandering and inconsistent thesis. What should be an erudite and compelling polemic against the the sexual revolution—Western culture’s death knell—is an inconsistent and often unreadable mess.
[...]
>First and foremost, his writing is very, very poor. The overall structure of the book—jumping from year to year, place to place, vignette to vignette—makes it hard to follow intellectual rather than a thematic elements. Given the fact that the book’s thesis is nebulous and has a tendency to change as Jones goes along (more on that below), reading the book is a major slog.
>A inquiring reader can jump to any given page to witness Jones’s lame writing. More shocking is his plain sloppiness and failure to edit himself. Just one of many many examples: On page 88, the author quotes Abbe Barruel, ending with “for men may be turned into any thing by him who knows how to take advantage of their ruling passion.” ONE PARAGRAPH LATER Jones uses the SAME EXACT QUOTE, except he finishes with the word “passions”—not “passion.” In other words, Jones repeats the exact same argument by using the same quote in succeeding paragraphs—and cannot even get the quoted material right! To call this a first draft is too kind—it is a first draft seemingly written the night before it was due! This is simply unforgivable.
[...]
>Let’s start here: Jones has habit of noting tacit connections between his characters rather than connecting the intellectual undercurrents which united them. This method moves along more like a conspiracy theory or a six-degrees-of-Kevin-Bacon game than scholarship. For example, in the early chapters, Jones repeatedly tries to unite the Marquis de Sade, William Godwin, Abbe Barruel. It really does not work; Jones is forced to use lame narrative devices such as speculating what Mary Wollstonecraft must have been thinking while she trudged through the blood-drenched Paris streets; speculations over how affected Percy and Mary Shelley were by Sade; huge leaps of faith over the effect the good priest Barruel had on later sex perverts. With regards to the English liberals, it is clear that Jones simply does not respect their work enough to learn it and refute it—Paglia's work would serve him well here. More than this, the idea that later sex-mongers were inspired by the Jesuit reactionary Barruel’s is largely speculation; even if it were true, who cares? There are countless secret societies; the question is why the secret societies promoting sexual perversion ended up so popular. Instead of adequately defining the relevant intellectual undercurrents, Jones is reliant on his vignettes and weak editorializing.
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/1906990944

>>13193936
>https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/1906990944
Excellent review. EMJ is a hack.

>>13193338
>asking for clarification is being triggered
Yeesh

>>13193934

>your posts aren't making any posts

Perhaps English isn't your first language?

>>13193961
I meant sense, touché. Although using the exact same insult against me as I used against you is pretty indicative of low IQ. I honestly suggest you get it checked.

>>13193936
Cringe

>>13193989
>this post makes me angry and I can't articulate why
Then don't you take a stroll back to r*ddit, retard?

>>13194006
You went and copied a review. You are the pure definition of cringe

>>13194045
That wasn't me, and the poster quoted a review and linked to it, not copied it. How is that cringe?
But perhaps I forget that it's now summer and I'm probably arguing with kids.

>>13193986

tell me when you're done.

>>13193230
completely and utterly btfo

"First draft of a great work" is spot on. Though that's par for the course with EMJ.

>>13193184
Jones was extremely careful to specify what, exactly, it was about the Illuminati that he thought was relevant to his thesis and not to overstate its importance -- moreso, I think, than anything else in the book. The Illuminati -> Barruel -> Shelley connection is speculative, though. EMJ probably should have been satisfied with using the Illuminati was an example of the therapeutic control he talks about later instead of trying to puzzle out a direct link from them to Freud; it doesn't matter.

>>13193459
>haha

Reminder that E. Michael Jones is on Twitter now.

>>13193338
>I am very intelligent

Just read about Kinsey's report. How could he walk freely after what he did?

Except for the papist nonsense he is pretty good from I have seen on YouTube.
I have this and the Jewish revolutionary spirit but still have not got to reading them.

>>13195596
Correct.

>>13193936
>it’s too broad
>he put an ‘s’ on the end of a quote!
Top pedantry
Ultimately this is entirely immaterial; this reviewer can struggle and bitch about it all they want, doesn’t change the facts that thousands of people get the message

>>13194057
>That wasn't me
>I'm (...) arguing

dude wtf you can't just hijak like that

>>13193230
based

>>13193230
>finally, Roosh gathered up the gall to claim that the most important things in a man's life are money and sex
He recently converted to christianity, condemns casual sex now

>>13193459
>doesn't know what anti-logos means in a thread about EMJ

Confirmed for not having read EMJ. Opinion discarded

>>13192821
>Poorly researched trash
Where is the proof?

Interesting scholarship...

>>13193936
You post this every thread.

STOP
STOPOSTING THESE FKUCING NOFAP THREADS YOU FUCKS
JUST MASTURBATE. JUST DO IT FFS AND SHUT UP. JUST FUCKING JERK OFF AND BE DONE WITHJH IT AND STOP SPAMMING THIS NOFAP RETARDATION HERE
JUST FUCKINNG MASTURBATE THE END

>>13200861

>>13192806
This dude is just JBP 2.0 this time with more edge

>>13200861
>Hitler was a gay prostitue
Kek

>>13193459
amen, fellow based orthodox

read jay dyer instead everyone

I listened to it through the form of an audio book some nationalist guy did. The book itself is pretty solid, though it definitely needs editing and proofreading. Though the audio book kind of sucked because whenever the reader went off from reading the book it just devolved into his opinions and shit jokes. I think it was Vanguard Audio books.

>>13200861
Read carefully numbnuts. Jones could certainly use an editor, but what he's actually saying is:

>Someone else alleged that Hitler was a gay prostitute.
Notice that Jones isn't saying this in "his own" voice although yes he is trying to weasel it into the reader's head, this is propaganda 101 and this tactic is used again and again and again in persuasive media.
>Lots of Nazis were fags
Some important Nazis were incontrovertibly homos, although the extent to which "Nazis were gay" is a subjective judgment.
>DESPITE this, the Nazis found opposing fags to be a winning issue.