/lit/ - Literature

>>12919530
>I'm out of books to read
fucking how

/lit/ says you need to be able to recite critique of pure reason from memory before reading him
>>12919537
This, what the fuck OP

>>12919537
>>12919541
I meant out of books I'm currently interested in. My fucking autismo brain makes it so that if I'm not in the mood for a certain type of book I can't get myself to read it.

>>12919530
What memes? Accelerationists can't meme, so that should tell you how valid this shit is.

>>12919537
It's a shill thread. People try and sell their shit by playing naive and then following up with positive feedback and recommendations.
There's a thread almost every day, do you really believe that one new person is joining this board daily just to asked about Accelshit?

>>12919530
>gabbidull zo bad id gud
Literally all you need to know. Just watch a Steven Pinker video and then imagine him as an edgy teenager spouting 'capitalism BTFO socialism' memes.

>>12919530
>>12919541
you don't need to be an expert in Kant/Deleuze, but for most of the book he's writing for an academic audience, and he was a Kant scholar who became deeply interested in Deleuze. The first essay in the book cites all three critiques. Just pick up a few of the big meme essays and read them, if you like it, buy the book. If you can't understand any of it, don't buy the book.

>>12919581
You're 100% but it's even worse for D&G and recently that jacques cocksucker who are dead

>>12919595
>he's writing for an academic audience
you mean he's writing for his brainfried CCRU buddies

>>12919611
the CCRU produced such an abnormally high percentage of influential academics, it was our generation's version of Hegel, Holderlin, and Schelling's dorm room.

>>12919624

I'm personally tempted to get it just for the weird parentheses and binary sections

>>12919624
this is what anglos actually believe

>>12919595
NeoChina arrives from a blockchain ban?

>>12919609
I thought they were rotated out for Whitehead. Although DG persists, it's not as bad as it used to be.

>>12919727
>China banning crypto"currency"
BASED

>>12919727
>this kills the Land
I-it wasn't supposed to go like this...

>>12919686
Literally who.

>>12919727
This would be great for bitcoin if they were actually breaking up the Chinese mining conglomerates, but the farms will just find a way to outsource the hardware to other countries

>>12919749
>if you kill your enemies they win

>>12919567
What's autistic about that? Why would you read things you don't want to read?

>>12919530
just dont like it was a decent meme a few years ago but with L-Accelerationist over taking the field Land is pretty much the sole last R-Accelerationist/NRx left. If your interested in cyberpunk shit read "Neuromancer" and "Snowfall"(?) but Land is more of a mad black deleuzian and if you have yet to read and suck deleuze of 50x you wont understand shit.

>fyi Ccru the little clique of occult writers land was in; im certain that they all did amphetamines through the CCRU years writing on speed binging out work. Its pretty obvious nonetheless I just don't think Land should be the only one getting accused

>>12919788
If you aren't a scholar in all of philosophy and you havent been reading continental philosophy as of late youll waste your money,wont enjoy it and wont get it kys

>>12919778
do you know what a 51% attack is? do you know anything about bitcoin at all? literally no one likes Chinese mining

>>12919801
>I just don't think Land should be the only one getting accused
Sadie Plant literally made up some bullshit about having to do actual academic research before writing on a topic being a constraint on "Promethean creativity of the writer" of something along those lines

>>12919806
No, you kiss your self! ;D

>>12919818
Greenspan is very obviously guilty to this too. The funny thing is if you check all CCRU members now they have all aged terribly; they all look like former addicts of some kind and there all in their 50s. Pic related is Greenspan and I coudent find info on her age but im certain shes under 60. Albeit I've criticized them in this post I do admit their all scholars well trainer in continental philosophy but they are more so (theory)fiction writers if anything. Great minds lost to cyberfeminism and cybernetic occult shit.

>>12919882

>>12919816
>due you just don't get hodling lmao
lol

>>12919896
And I know you'll just post 'B-BUT THAT M-MEANS IT'S R-REALL-LY S-S-SAFE!'
If bitcoin has intrinsic value, why does it have to colourise all its marketing with gold?

>>12919816
lmao imagine trying to make a philosophy out of zoomer suckers to a ponzi scheme.

>>12919896
>>12919905
51% attacks have nothing to do with holding, the fact you have pivoted to the Quadriga story basically confirms the depth of your understanding of cryptography and distributed networking is limited to internet article headlines

>>12919924
>51% attack
>philosophy
what did he mean by this?

>>12919927
>51% attacks
Thinking I would naively respond to non sequiturs and bad faith arguments.
KYSs.

>>12919936
Your UberGnon is the one writing a book on it, dumbass. And I'm saying you're a double sucker for falling for the ponzi and some philosophy based on it.

>>12919950
Just one. Is that too much to ask?

>>12919980
>non sequiturs
Chinese mining and 51% attacks are closely related, the Quadriga post is the non-sequitur. I've had conversations like this with you before, I think you legitimately assume computer science is some kind of fallacy or conspiracy to grift millennials.

ITT: shilling for glorified stamps

>>12919984
Land's bitcoin book is dealing with the issue of metaphysics, literally nothing in this thread is remotely close to Land's take on bitcoin. What do you think it happening right now anon? Did you forget some medication or something? It's like you're talking to people who aren't here.

>>12920019
>>12920036
These are the people who worship Land.
Note: you must have zero reading comprehension to get Fanged Noumena.

>>12919950

>>12919578
>>12919581
>>12919592
>>12919609
>>12919611
>>12919716
>>12919727
>>12919778
>>12919984
>>12920043
every time

>>12920065
Just post one. It's not that hard.

>>12919686
Holy fucking cringe.

>shill book
>get btfo
>spam thread
>still btfo
>abandon thread
>start new one
You would think that the fastest metaphysicians on the planet would have better tactic than this.
Maybe it's the music...

Accelerationists are the Qtards of marxism.

>>12920609
>btfo
might as well just /thread your own comment if you're going to be that presumptious

>>12920645
Just post a single meme or argument and you might regain some respect.

>>12920651
assuming by context of previous
>Just post a meme!! A single meme!!1! Lol!!11!!11one!!!oneone!!1111!!11!!11!!!!!!¡¡¡
it seems that you like Nick Land. I do too, so you're barking up the wrong tree here

>I'm an accelerationist who reads physical copies of books

>>12920072
You're too slow

>>12920687

>>12920923
this is pretty much the only reason I'm going to buy the book lmao

>>12920687
I have to be prepared for mammon to take over eliminating the struggled race bringing up cyberfeminism demons the women will begin to allude us with delusions of delusions we will face xenomorphic extremism the xenomorphic cyberfeminism is expected and expected to be taken as a serious threat. With FN in my right hand and my bionic eyes I will super-cede and missionary for the NRx nor will I forget my past the CCRU writings will be encased in leather and chained to my waist for there is no forgetting their is no forgiving. The future of deterritorialization and reterritorialization is inevitable nor should we react to harshly nor to lightly the engine will run till the engine is no longer needed, realization is far too late only can we push.

>>12921222
that movie was so good

>>12920923
I have no words. This is perhaps the most autistic thing that I have ever seen. Like the Bronie cum jar is less autistic then this.

the pictures I've seen so far intrigue me, but I don't want to read a 666 page book about dark enlightenment. how neoreactionary is this particular book?

>understand Land
Now that's a spicy joke.

>>12919581
This.
There have been constant threads on this shit for ages despite every anon reiterating in every one that the book is completely autistic and pseud-tier

>>12922100
Not at all. Also, it's a collection of writings on different things, but they have a lot in common. So I probably wouldn't read it cover to cover.

>>12920923
Finally, someone who knows what a monad is!

>>12922234
We also have constant threads about Stirner despite his obscurity. You think thats because some immortal milk-merchant is selling his own book?
Nick Land is highly memeable so he is very popular here.

>>12919738
What? It was always going to go like this. CCP wields capitalism to the extent that it can empower the state. Pretty fundamentally ideologically opposed to Bitcoin, which is the ability for capital to transcend and escape the state.

>>12922100
>tfw the CCRU tome is also 666 pages

>>12922783
Stinrer doesn't have threads every day trying to shill his books, it's a meme at best.
And Land isn't highly memeable because accelerationists don't have a single good meme. They're literally worse than Dawkins at memeing.

>>12919950
you forgot "is trans"

bumping the most important thread on the board