/lit/ - Literature

NO!!!!!! This book is a /lit/ classic! Something must be done!!!

>>12752798
they're not carrying it in their store, not outright destroying any copy of it

>>12752824
At what point in the digital era does one lend to the other?

>>12752798
of course amazon is notorious for banning books it doesn't like
>>12752824
in the current age this is equivalent implying you wouldn't sperg out if amazon stopped selling some lgbt book

>>12752798
Good, maybe now Macdonald will stop paying neetcels to shill his shit.

>>12752798

Theres still no damn English edition of Solzhenitsyn's book on the Jews. No, not cool, Bucko.

>>12753044
Also, >mfw

Next they'll be banning Jordan Peterson's books! They don't want us to know the truth!

>>12752832
voltaire didnt say that psued

shit can i still cop it somewhere??

>>12753115
Amazon isn't the only online bookseller

>>12753115
Links in the OP.

>>12752798
>>12753092
>first they came for the incels and I said nothing

I have to buy this now desu

>>12753184
Next thing you know they'll be coming for 4chan, and then Reddit will be the only true bastion of free speech left.

>>12753092
You jest, but not even Peterson will touch that Solzhenitsyn book.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSmN_vTpsk8

>>12753209
I can't wait tbqh. pls end this website and dox the incels. I hope when the democrats win in 2020 the nation of america celebrates by hunting down incels in their basements, dragging them to town squares, stripping them naked and beating them to death while the women laugh at their small genitals.

>>12752836
At no point.

>implying you can't find the pdf from a single web search
These fuckers have no idea about the Streisand effect. Just keep telling people it's forbidden literature. They'll seek it out.

How often does amazon book bans cause other sites to do so as well? Might cop a few copies and sell them high to some incels in the future.

Why the fuck does Moon's lolcow forum have a pdf of culture of critique

>>12753222
I have large genitals, although only when aroused (what is known as a "shower", as opposed to a "grower"; for more information on this distinction consult the entry in the Encyclopedia Britannica). Needless to say, if I were stripped naked and beaten in the public square in front of an audience of laughing women, I would be very VERY aroused.

>>12753301
I think I'm gonna need to see some pics of your girthy trouser snake my dude, no homo

In all seriousness, has anyone here that isn't a /pol/tard or an antisemite read it? Is it an interesting read?

>>12752798
i was already planning on reading it but this has sped up the process

>>12753316
I'm not a /pol/tard, I've been banned from that board. But I don't read books either so I can't help you.

>>12753103
Read the filename

>>12753437
still, rather remove that image

>>12752798
Why; what's it about?

>>12753316
Define "antisemite".

>>12753454
People who hate Jews just for being Jews.

>>12752798
Glad I bought a copy before it started getting banned

>>12752798
good thing ive already got one

>>12753456
>3456
In that case, I should be an acceptable judge for you. I have read up to page 96 (and then I got distracted by some other works). Most notable to me so far is his analysis of how Boas cultivated a crew to stifle discussion of anthropological views that were counter to Boasian works. There is no bombastic diatribe. You can question whether or not MacDonald's criticism is valid - but it is substantially well researched criticism.

>>12753507
K, guess I'll consider giving it a read some time. If anything, just for the meme value of the book.

>>12753456
>just for being Jews.

anon...

>>12753517
What? There are plenty of people on this site who basically consider some kind of corrupted ontological status, akin to original sin. It's basically insane, and stupid. I don't want book reccomendations from retards who don't know how to use their brain.

>>12753286
It's his favorite book besides a recipe collection.

>>12753525
>some kind of corrupted ontological status
As much as Jews present themselves as a relatively homogenous group, they are extremely genetically varied. Finding inherent fault with their being, rather than with their actions, would be an indictment against all of the population groups that fed their current population - unless one made the argument that Judaism naturally attracts the worst of a population group. Anyways, I see none of that in the book - just articulation of recorded behaviors, just as the title of the book suggests.

>>12752798
Good thing i bought this a few months ago
People who are scared of books deserve the rope

>>12753525
on /lit/ it's mostly just one or 3 guys. one of them is named claude and he's a schizophrenic

>>12752798
I feel good about book burning. Only the intellectual vanguard has a need for exchange of ideas, and for the good of society only they should have control of ideas.

>>12753092

>>12753316
Read this book. It blew my mind, I really thought it was just a /pol/ meme but NO ! It's so well researched.. I think McDonald is a detail maniac because nothing he wrote wasn't sourced.

>>12753044
there is https://meguca.org/assets/images/src/750198a7453d8df27bd62e74eec52de9011d490f.pdf

>>12752901
no I wouldn't sperg out

they own the store, they can choose what they sell in it. people don't get pissy at religious stores for not carrying lgbt books after all

This is not a ban, this is a private retailer deciding to not carry a book.

Personally I think part of the reason amazon does this it to help keep themselves from becoming a monopoly. The lose of business for not selling this is not enough to even make a blip in their sales but it is enough to make a difference to small retailers.

>>12754185
brainlet tier lolberg shit lol enjoy having your bank account shut down because you browse 4chan

>>12752798
Fuck Amazon desu

>>12752798
I don’t sincerely care.

>>12754185
Good point. Amazon is, after all, of the ZOG religious persuasion.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLiagEc_u8w

>>12752798
we're banning scientific books now? even nazis didn't go this far.

Is the value of the book likely to increase lads?

>>12753316
it's a science book from a biology PhD
and the most amazing part is that Jews haven't been able to debunk any of it, so all they can do is call him anti-semitic.

>>12754186
>durr private retailer
When that retailer has an effective monopoly on the internet book market, it’s akin to a ban. Do you think there’d be Coke in the vending machine if Pepsi owned the town hall?

>>12754186
Yes, I'm sure. They're removing white wrong-thinkers because they don't want to become a "monopoly". These are the high IQ opinions found on /lit/

let's start an alt-right bookstore

>>12753044
Slozo doesn't even bash them that much, thus book is just one big meme.

>>12754562
They did though.

>>12754601
post it

>>12753917
How do you know?

>>12754606
Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy
A Critical Analysis of Kevin MacDonald’s Theory

5s on google you lazy bum

>>12754615
Shut up idiot

>>12754615
sure, I'm not a biologist so I can't argue for or against that theory, but you can't deny all the actions of jewish people that's documented in that book is wrong.

>>12753316
>Jews have no homeland
>Jews are always a minority
>therefore, they stand to gain a lot by influencing a society to be more friendly towards minorities
>therefore, powerful Jews might start banding together in order to influence their host-society
That's pretty much the entire book summed up. The good part is, you have no need for a grand narrative of a great, malafide conspiracy. Just a bunch of Jews acting in their own self-interest which leads to them working together organically without central leadership in the form of the Illuminati or whatever.

>>12754637
Right, I'm french and my people have done some pretty fucked up things across the globe. Your point?

My problem with you people is that you focus so much on your satan that you never look around. You believe that you're looking at tye hidden truth but you just have your head into your ass.

>>12754665
If you think that forced /leftypol/ meme has anything to do with the arguments about the nature of Jewish power, you've never actually read CoC or honestly listened to one of your opponents arguments.

>>12754665
the difference is that jews are still doing that shit.

>>12754615
Hardly something you could call a refutation.

CoC is so legit, its translation is legal in Germany.

>>12754679
>if you don't believe me it's becaue you're dishonest
No. I've seen far more dishonesty coming from antisemites. Hell they start to sounds like bots after a while, it's not the first time someone tell me what you said.
I'm not even from /leftypol/ either can't you function without a boogeyman?

>>12754721
Ah yes we totally stopped fucking up other countries for moneys, that's right, honhonhon. Btw the ceos showed here are pretty recent. What about the germans? The current USA president is one. I'm pretty sure they're ovverepresented among the richest people of the world too. Pretty strange hu?

>>12754649
I've never understood why had anyone has had a problem with the book, it's whole premise is at least common-sensical. I feel like if it was framed as something the Jew's should work on, rather than some deep insight into the 'Jewish problem', no one would have any issues with it.

>>12754763
None of this says anything about the quality of Macdonald's book. If anything, it seems like you haven't even read or looked at the table of contents.

>>12754566
they are not an effective monopoly.
>>12754567
they remove the stuff that will not harm their primary market, primarily middle class big city folk, so mostly left. Which is easy to show just looking at the effect of the various boycotts the left has done to amazon, like the one after it was found that amazon "supports hate groups."

They're just so blatant. The apparent academic critical reception that makes the book not worth reading in Wikipedia's eyes in a mindless blurb from a Jewish person who admits he himself did not read the book.

How does MacDonald define a Jew?

Guys...is it worth buying this book to scalp later?

>>12754783
>>>/biz/

>>12754769
What the fuck are you talking about? This?
>>12754615
The author argue that the sources are cherrypicked and badly interpreted, and quite convincingly. The book read like it was written by a /pol/ack with a bigger than average IQ but the actual problem of the argumentations are still there.

>>12754773
let me ask you this, if the retailer that controls 80% of book market bans a handful of books from one political leaning, what's going to happen? 80% of the people are going to see more books from one ideology, but none from the other, this will absolutely have a cumulative effect over time.

>>12754790
>The book read like it was written by a /pol/ack with a bigger than average IQ but the actual problem of the argumentations are still there.
This is a blatant lie and your anger is revealing your dishonest intentions here btw.

>>12754799
How so?

>In numerous places in The Culture of Critique, references are given to support a claim
but no support can be found in the original source, or the original source is
misrepresented. Because the present paper is focused on the argument of the book, it
only reports some of these misrepresentations where they significantly affect the
argument. Also, for considerations of length, it only reports cases of mishandling of
sources where the problems can be clearly exposed in a reasonable amount of space.
Despite the fact that only some instances of mishandling of sources are reported here,
these cases alone raise serious questions about MacDonald’s research practices.

>A common pattern throughout The Culture of Critique is that the same behavior is
given a different interpretation depending on whether it is performed by Jews or
gentiles. For example, when gentiles assume leadership positions in radical movements
(e.g., John Dewey, Carl Jung), it is because “gentiles have . . . been actively recruited to
the movements . . . and given highly visible roles . . . in order to lessen the appearance
that the movements are indeed Jewish-dominated or aimed only at narrow Jewish
sectarian interests” (1988a:4). MacDonald calls this phenomenon “a major theme” of
his book. Another explanation he gives for gentile involvement in radical politics is that
“once Jews have attained intellectual predominance, it is not surprising that gentiles
would be attracted to Jewish intellectuals as members of a socially dominant and
prestigious group and as dispensers of valued resources” (1988a:3).

Just two exemples. Of course if you have no problem with that in the low-IQ propaganda you'll have no problem with that in the intellectual one but it's still the same bullshit at hearth, only with better cherrypicked sources.

>>12754790
>The author argue that the sources are cherrypicked and badly interpreted, and quite convincingly. The book read like it was written by a /pol/ack with a bigger than average IQ but the actual problem of the argumentations are still there.
Yep, seems like you have neither took a closer look at the book, nor at the failed attempt of a refutation. Just the usual, generic accusations of cherrypicking, conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, low iq poltard, etc..

>>12754797
it is easy to demonstrate that the main users of Amazon are left leaning, so they stop selling those right leaning books and their users become even more left leaning. All the while the right leaning people look elsewhere for their books which means other retailers get the business and Amazon becomes and more ineffective monopoly. it is pretty simple anon, unless you lack the ability to search for the book on the search engine of your choice and select it from any of the dozens of retailers that will pop up, or you could just order it through a local book store.

>>12754799
O yeah by the book I mean CoC not it's debunking. I also read parts of the Protocoles and those were even more dreadful, basically a vilain monologuing for way too long. I can't believe anyone would believe those are actual reports from real-life planning.

>>12754820
And based on these assumptions, it's safe to ban the book.

>>12754820
Please points part of the refutations that are bad please.
>>12754615
The title if you forgot.

>>12754823
Why are you trying to associate CoC with the Protocols now? They have nothing in common.
>>12754832
Kek, playing this game again, aren't we.
Why don't you look at what the man himself has to say about it, even though you'll probably make up a reason to discredit that, too.
>http://www.unz.com/article/reply-to-nathan-cofnas/
5s on google you lazy bum

>>12753332
based and lit-userpilled

>>12754851
>can’t even muster the intellectual nous to refute points himself
LMAO
>support for Israel is not synonymous with how Jews see their ethnic interests at any particular time, and there has likely never been a time when it was unanimous. Jewish support for a Jewish ethnostate was a minority view among Jews prior to the end of World War II, and today Jewish support for Israel in the Diaspora is declining—particularly noticeable among liberal/left Jews. There may be many reasons for this, ranging from lofty idealism to concern that Israeli policies will be disastrous for Israel and Jewish interests in the long run
>jews are bad because they’re Zionists and because they all have collective influence on Western nations except when they disagree with each other but that doesn’t matter and uuuuuuhhhh JUST BELIEVE ME PLEASE THE JEWS ARE BAD THE JEWS ARE BAD I DONT KNOW WHY BUT THEY AAAARRRREEEE

>>12754851
The protocols are a good exemple of the mentality of the antisemite: ready to believe anything as long as it cast jews into a bad light. See the jews were slavemaster meme that was started by black israelites (or nation of islam I don't remember).

Anyway, i don't have time to fully read the answer you linked for now, I'llcome back to it later. But I've read the beggining and I' not impressed.
>muh white genocide
Yeah I'm sure importing ten of thousands of muslim is in the interest of jews, good job mac

>>12752798
Wtf, fuck Jeff Bezos

>>12754901
>>12754911
>strawmanning this hard
Why am I even wasting time with you clowns.

>>12754925
Lol
>durr you’re strawmanning!
literally just responded to an actual quote from the article

>>12754780
something that really hit home for me was Moldbug's thought experiment of Germany having won WWII. What would Nazi-Wikipedia look like? Would it be very different from ours? What would the article on the law of gravity look like? Would it be supported by scientific evidence? What about the Nazi-Wikipedia entry on "race"? Jews? Would these articles appear credible to readers in Nazi-Germany?

What does that mean for us, and our Wikipedia?

>>12754925
He litteraly say that white replacement is what motivate his writing.

>>12754938
Wikipedia is fucking awful. It's so bad, these two articles shattered not only my trust in Wikipedia, but in my trust that the education I've received is valid.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_supremacy
> (Redirected from White power)
>White supremacy or white supremacism is the racist belief that white people are superior to people of other races and therefore should be dominant over them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Power
>Black Power is a political slogan and a name for various associated ideologies aimed at achieving self-determination for people of African descent.

When I first realized how big this double-standard was I was forced to question everything I thought I knew.

>>12753456
literally no one does this, what a fucking joke

>>12754945
You can take a look at the internet archive and see how in recent years they completely changed the tone of their entry on Julius Evola. That was a big wake-up moment for me as well. There are comparative screenshots floating around on the internet but I can't be bothered right now.

>>12754790
so transparent and boring

>>12754945
>Wikipedia is fucking awful
indeed
pic related, my work

>>12754782
He analyses movements consisting of strongly self defined Jews

>>12754956
Incredible, this is from 2014

>>12754956
And this is today
>He was an EXTREME RACIST FASCIST who liked RAPE

>>12754991
lmfao and they even changed the picture to be less flattering and cast in shadows

man I can't wait for the day we get to kill these libshits

>>12754991
Also funny how today’s article has to mention “hehe he’s a dumb-dumb because he believed in ghosts and alchemy lmao”

>>12754991
>he has been described by some guy as a literal nazi
jesus chrisst

>>12754991
>Evola also justified rape
lol who wrote this

>>12752798
Jews a middleman minority, otherwise known as economically dominant minority or a merchant caste. They procreated endogameously (only with each other, if they married out they ceased to be part of the community) and carried out a function within the larger non-jewish agricultural society (namely banking, but also trade).
In the last two hundred years Jews have secularised and been accepted into wider parts of society, allowing them, with their higher average IQ, to achieve some incredible cultural and scientific feats. Look back through history. How many famous 17th century Jewish composers? Painters? Philosophers? Mathematicians? Very few. Not because they weren't smart but because they were all doing Jewy things in the shtetl.
This blossoming of talent is their undoing however. As Jews secularised, the forces that encouraged them to marry other jews weakened. Now secular Jews marry out at astonishing rates, upwards of 50%. They will cease to a distinguishable minority. Only the hyper religious Jews will be left, and they will no longer be performing their role as bankers to Christian kings, but just another weird religious community like the Amish.
Jews are not unique. Armenians in Turkey and Chinese in SE Asia have performed similar roles. The opposite is observed in the various gypsy groups of Europe; endogamous groups unrelated genetically, such as the Irish travellers and Roma, that have taken on similar roles as travelling tinkers, those who assimilated into the wider population lost their identity leaving behind an ever more distinct and dysfunctional group who have now lost their purpose in modern society.

If anyone wants a good summary of the book

https://youtu.be/7pep6LjYmuI

>>12755001
Jews have always been the same.
In the New Testament they are the usurous money lenders. In 1170 they funded an illegal war to have the English invade Ireland.

In more recent history when we can see the inner workings of movements easier we see:
Jews monopolized banking and capital in the 1700s
Are behind every corrosive social movement for the last 100 years
For some reason have a complete monopoly on media for the last 100 years
Are behind most world terrorism including 9/11

Anyways there is definitely something weird about Jews

>>12755012
Why do people say that CoC has no citations when you can clearly see citations in this video?

>>12754991
Wiki is nothing more than a smear Portal for dissidents at this point

>>12755019
>b-but they had no choice because they were barred from all other work..

>>12755040
Banned from everything except critical roles in media and banking. What a hard bargain.

So what is the "culture of critique"? Does the book really say anything on it, or does it just talk about Jews the whole time? Judging by the threads for it I'd say the title is misplaced.

>>12755055
jews have a culture of critique

>>12755066
As in they are worthy of critique, or they have a tendency to critique? If the latter, why and how is that a bad thing?

>>12755092
They critique the wider culture to their benefit. Emphasise white privilege, but not Jewish privilege, despite by all metrics that the former is measured the latter is larger.

You can thank german autism for creating the ultimate silver bullet against this. Fucking krauts

>>12755108
Critique is a very important step in the process of evolution though, so I'm still having a hard time seeing how this is such a bad thing. They are underhanded, sure, but the insights their underhandedness provides seem foundational.

>>12755139
what's the silver bullet

>>12755148
their critiques always target white people and their identity. atheism is one such thing, have you noticed that jewish intellectuals always target christians?

>>12755161
>their critiques always target white people and their identity.
And as a white I find that helpful in quite a few ways. I guess I didn't complete my sentence: critique is a very important step in the process of evolution — for that which is being critiqued.

>>12755161
because christianity is one of the biggest religions.....

>>12755155
"muh hall o' cost"

>>12755169
I think what he's trying to say is that they use critique as a weapon *selectively* maximizing it in areas they wish to manipulate whilst intentionally ignoring it in others even if it is more prevalent and concerning elsewhere - or would reveal them to be hypocritical.

Just ordered a copy elsewhere. Don't know if I would have if not for the ban. Do they really expect it to have any effect on potential readers other than make us more interested?

>>12755055
It refers to critical theory which came from the Frankfurt school, but how this same method was used in different self-consciously Jewish social, political, and academic movements in the 20th century.
For example, psychoanalysis was a self consciously Jewish movement (almost all the members were strongly identified Jews) that made a movement to critique and change gentile culture. These movements were characterized by Jews feeling themselves as outsiders, changing gentile culture to make it more agreeable for them and their own.
So Jews were insturmental in changing western culture to be called multi-cultural and changed immigration law to make it so. Before that they were monogomous societies were small pockets of outsiders like Jews.
The Frankfurt school was created to criticize every aspect of Western culture, from medicine, to family, to religion, to race, history, marriage, every cornerstone of what made the society what it was. They did this with the intention to weaken gentile culture so that what happened in Germany would not happen again, where a majority movement could occur to rise up against (((a))) powerful or oppressive minority.

>>12755204
Most people are hypocritical though, Jewish or not. And most people want to control things, Jewish or not. They are perhaps better at both those things than most people and that's why people grow to hate them. But in that hatred, people are overlooking their intellectual value.

The real problem will always be the herd.

>>12754994
What do you mean less flattering? The old picture is disgusting to look at. The new one looks mysterious and alluring.

>>12755234
>most people want to control things
Thats actually not true. Most people want to live in a harmonious society with their family. Most people dont want to have to try to control all of society. It is much better to be able to trust that different aspects of society will function in harmony.
Needing to control society is a Jewish thing, because they take themselves to be outsiders and have a paranoid schizophrenic normal society making them need to control it.

>The real problem will always be the herd
Wtf?
The real problem will always be society at large? So a small group of power needs to control and change it? Are you sure youre not a yid? That would be quite intersting if you were and you thought this. No one can know but you but if youre a Jew you should ask yourself why yuo think this

>>12755234
>intellectual value
That's the point anon, the whole book is saying that Jews only use their 'intellectual value' to benefit themselves. They've an average IQ of 103 as well, with much higher verbal IQs but in exchange for that their focus on inbreeding/selective breeding have led to a far higher than average tendency to genetic diseases.

The book is making the point that Jews, due to their culture and genetic traits for in group preference, act as a herd within a herd.

>>12755251
>paranoid schizophrenic view of normal society**

>>12755234
that's why white nationalism is so desirable. jews have their own state (however immoral its existence may be) that they can go to.
when you have multiple ethnic groups battling it out for their share of the pie, it's not really a nation anymore. when you have nothing with your fellow countrymen, you stop caring about it and start becoming apathetic, this is apparent in USA.

>>12755170
You can criticise multiple religions at one time anon.

>>12754012
>tfw you will never burn the books of Shaw, Brecht, Fanon, Baldwin, Foucault, etc. out of existence.

>>12755169
But what is the purpose of a critique?
Is it to strengthen or weaken society? It can be used for either. Jews of course use it to weaken society

>>12755251
>Most people dont want to have to try to control all of society.
That's not the same as wanting to control things. Most people do want to control things — something at least. I'd also say most Jews don't want to control "all of society" either. Some people who aren't Jews also want to control all of society.

>The real problem will always be society at large?
Society =/= the herd. The herd is a mass movement rendered far less intelligent due to its groupthink. Herds are useful in war and politics for strong-arming things, but they're dangerous if given any kind of serious power over the direction of society.

>Are you sure youre not a yid?
No. Have you not read Nietzsche at all?

>>12755254
My point is that there is something for us to learn about ourselves in their critiques. That is their intellectual value as a people.

>>12755259
>that's why white nationalism is so desirable. jews have their own state (however immoral its existence may be) that they can go to.
100% agree.

>>12755285
>But what is the purpose of a critique?
What you make of it. Jews may be striving to weaken society, but if you're smart, you can use that to your advantage and actually strengthen it.

>>12755019
>In 1170 they funded an illegal war to have the English invade Ireland

>one jew help fund some normans raid on the irish
>all the jews are at fault
>muh banks
>jews were behind the nazis

>>12754573
the alt-write

>>12754573
hey guys check out my new site altamazon.com with the alt-write bookstore oh sorry guys we're banned from mastercard

>>12755259
Why would you use Israel as an example though? It is literally the most evil and criminal state to have ever existed. But the general point is true

>>12755308
>>one jew help fund some normans raid on the irish
>>all the jews are at fault
>>muh banks
>>jews were behind the nazis
that's the problem with most people who want a reason to hate jews. they blame the collective for the actions of an individual

>>12755298
The best way to be strengthened from Jews critiquing (for the purpose of) destroying your society would be to get rid of them. It is too sinister how they can pretend to be a part of your people and critique it as if they are the same viewpoint as you and the same endgoal

>>12755320
>an individual
CNN
President - David Levy - Jew
Chief Strategy officer- Doug Shapiro - Jew
Cheif marketing officer- Lauren Hurvitz - Jew
General counsel CLO- Louise Sams - Jew
Chief research officer- Howard Shimmel - Jew
Executive VP - Allison Gollust - Jew
Executive VP of News- Richard David - Jew
Executive VP of talent and content development - Amy Entalis - Jew
VP - Ken Jauntz - Jew
President - Jeff Zucker - Jew
Executive VP of editorial - Andrew Morse - Jew
washington bureau chief - sam Feist - Jew
Managing Editor - Adam Levine - Jew
director of washington programming - Eric Sherling - Jew
Chief political correspondent - Dana Bash - Jew
Chief Political Director - David Chalain - Jew
Chief Political Analyst - Gloria Borger - Jew
Senior Legal Analyst - Jeffery Toobin - Jew
Lead Political anchor - Wolf Blitzer - Jew
Chief washington correspondent - Jake Tapper - Jew
Host - John Berman - Jew
Host - Brian Stelter - Jew
Host - Kate Bouldan -Jew
Host - Jonathan Mann - Jew
Host - Drew Pinsky - Jew
Host - John King - Jew
Host - Richard Quest - Jew
Host - Carl Azuz - Jew
Political commentator - sally kohn - Jew
Political commentator - Hilary rosen - Jew
Political commentator - David Axelrod - Jew
Digital Correspondent - Dan Lieberman - Jew
Political correspondent - Alan Dershowitz - Jew
National correspond. - gary tuchman - Jew
National correspond. Jeanne Moos - Jew
National correspond. randi Kaye - Jew
Sr VP - Lisa Greene - Jew
SR Vp - Alex Wellen - Jew
Sr. Vp - Robin garfield - Jew
VP - Matt Dornic - Jew
Sr UN correspondent - Richard Roth - Jew
Sr Int'l correspondent - Ben Wedeman - Jew
Global Affairs correspondent - Elise Labott - Jew
Senior Health correspondent - Elizabeth Cohen - Jew
Special correspondent - Jamie Gangel - Jew
General Correspondent - Alison Kosik - Jew
Sr. tech correspondent - Lauri Segall - Jew
Bus and Tech Correspond. - Samuel burke - Jew
General Correspondent - Oren Lieberman - Jew
Global affairs analyst - Aron Miller - Jew
National Security analyst - Peter Bergen - Jew
Sr. Supervising producer - Antoine Sanfuentes _Jew
White house producer - Noah Grey - Jew
Sr Investigative producer - Scott Bronstein -Jew
digital producer - Joshua Berlinger - Jew
Politics producer - Marshall Cohen - Jew
Politics producer - Jeff Simon - Jew
Political analyst - David Gregory - Jew
Political Analyst - Maggie Haberman - Jew
Political analyst - Carl Bernstein - Jew
Political contributor - Alexis Grick - Jew
Political contributor - Johnathan Tasini - Jew
Political contributor - David Frum- Jew
Political contributor - Jason Kander - Jew
Political contributor - David Fahrenthold - Jew
Political contributor - Lanny davis -Jew
Political contributor - timothy Naftali - Jew
Political contributor - ari Fleischer - Jew
Political contributor - Steve Israel -Jew
Political contributor - Bill Kristol - Jew
Political contributor - Scottie Hughes - Jew
Political contributor - Peter Beinart - Jew
Political contributor - Jeff Weaver - Jew
(maxed out)

>>12755336
>only naming the Jews working there
>doesn't know CNN has 3000 employees
try harder

>>12755319
I'm sure if the bigbrained Jewish intellectuals directed their bigbrained critiques toward Israel, they could fix it. I mean, if I'm to understand correctly, they love open borders and separation of church and state, I'm sure they'll push for it in Israel with the same vigor as they have done here.

>>12755327
>get rid of them.
And also patch up the leaks they found to exploit. I doubt that NatSoc would have really formed as an ideology were it not for their meddling, for example. And this isn't the first instance in history where they contributed to the formulation of ideologies, both directly and indirectly.

>>12755339
I could put more but the characters were maxed out. Its the same for every news company. If I even have to explain this..........................

>>12755343
No you missed the point. Jews in Western cultures critiques the culture for the purpose of weakening it to ensure that gentiles would not band together to revolt against Jewish power. They wouldnt do that to themselves in Israel

>>12755339
I mean those are the prominent and important ones, who the fuck cares about the coffee bitch or whatever

>>12755339
That's another problem. Hiding all the non-jews make the jews seems everywhere

>>12755376
your infographics are retarded they only name the Jewish employees and you seem to be forgetting that the average IQ of Jews is 108-115. they have a higher average verbal and mathematical intelligence (hence why they excel in journalism). Also small groups in society like Jews help eachother out. they look out for eachother. they're called middleman minorities
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middleman_minority

>>12755389
but all those political contributers work for other newspaper's or websites too.

>>12755339
Look at their positions in that company.

>>12755339
Let's try another one
NYT
Executives-
Arthur O Sulzberger Jr. – Chairman & Publisher - Jew
Michael Golden – Vice Chairman - Jew
Arthur Greg Sulzberger – Deputy Publisher-Jew
Mark Thompson – President & CEO - Jew
Joseph Kahn – Managing Editor - Jew
Meredith Kopit Levin - Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer- jew
James Bennet – Lead Editor, Editorial Page - Jew
David Perpich – President & General Manager, The Wirecutter - Jew
Rebecca Blumenstein – Deputy Managing Editor - Jew
Paul Walborsky – Senior Vice President, NYT Global - Jew
Nick Rockwell - Executive Vice President & Chief Technology Officer - Jew
Bureau Cheifs-
Elisabeth Bumiller – Washington D.C. Bureau Chief - Jew
Adam Nagourney – Los Angeles Bureau Chief - Jew
Steven Erlanger – London Bureau Chief - Jew
Alissa Rubin – Paris Bureau Chief - Jew
Jason Horowitz – Rome Bureau Chief - Jew
Alison Smale – Berlin Bureau Chief - Jew
Rick Lyman - Central and Eastern European Bureau Chief - Jew
Damien Cave – Australia Bureau Chief. - Jew
Jeffrey Gettleman – South Asia Bureau Chief - jew
Chief Correspondents
Mark Leibovich – Chief National Correspondent- Jew
Shane Goldmacher – Chief Political Correspondent - Jew
Peter Baker – Chief White House Correspondent - jew
Cheryl Stolberg – Chief Domestic Affairs - jew
Michael Gordon – Chief Military Correspondent - jew
Andrew Ross Sorkin – Chief M&A Correspondent - jew
Liz Alderman – Chief European Business Correspondent- jew

Its a majority. There definitely should be some gentiles working there giving that gentiles are what Jews would call 98.5% of the population.

Also speaking technically, almost 100% of media in america is owned by Jews, Of the 5 media conglomerates that own 95% of all media in the United States, Viacom, CBS, Disney, Time Warner, Comcast, all of these are CEO'd by Jewish people.

Disney - Bob Iger, Jew
Viacom - Sumner Redstone - Jew
CBS - Les Moonves - jew
Comcast - Brian Roberts - Jew
Time Warner - John Stankey - Jew
CNN - David Levy - jew
The Guardian - David Pemsel - jew
Vox - Ezra Klein - jew
BBC - Danny Cohen - jew
the Economist - Eli Goldstein - jew
NPR - howard wollner - Jew

>>12755291
Jews don't critique themselves, they critique others. They purely use it as a tool to take apart people's ideas and ignore their own criticism.

>>12755404
That's not true the average IQ in Israel is 97 or so. If it was up to IQ, asians have the highest. Also given that they are 6% of the population instead of 2%, asians should control the media.

OBVIOUSLY it is nepotism, or something weird. People were complaining about Jewish people controlling the media in the 1920s

>>12755417
This was already stated and I already gave a response: >>12755169

>>12754649
wow I could just read Genesis for 10 minutes

>>12755428
Why are you assuming that biased critique that is intended only to tear apart what it is aimed at is going to be beneficial? They are not doing it for beneficent reasons, the criticism is malicious in intent.

>>12754938
I'll be the leader :)

>>12755424
>That's not true the average IQ in Israel is 97 or so
Israel is only 70% Jewish. and even then I'm talking about Ashkenazi Jews
>Also given that they are 6% of the population instead of 2%, asians should control the media.
Asians are in fact a very successful group they have higher average income than whites. but as for Asians in the media. how many of them are actually fluent in English?
>>12755416
holy shit, pic related

>>12755424
That's because only the smart Jews emigrate

>>12755416
yeah they should be handing out CEO positions to NEET 4channelers like me but thanks to Hitler that will never happen :(

>>12755444
I'm not assuming anything. German national socialism actually did form in response to changes in Germany at the time which caused a demand for a new and more wholesome identity for the Germans. I'm just trying to promote intellectual cleanliness here.

>>12755404
this is a leftist argument, but it applies here. if a ethic group of people dominate discourse, of course it's going to have aspects of personal bias and won't reflect the interests of the the other groups. the difference is that leftists usually say that white people are the people that dominate the discourse instead, but that's obviously not true.

>>12755404
They have an IQ of 103 after much interbreeding with the white population in America, they are not 113 IQ. China has the highest average IQ at like, 108?

>>12755464
NS wasn't wholesome though :)

>>12755464
Why are you talking about German National Socialism when I'm saying that the book is alleging the criticism the Jews are alleging is not being done in good faith and is being done to actually weaken whatever topic they are focusing on and, if attacked for this, will retreat into semantics.

>>12755449
>posts a bunch of companies that are owned by media conglomerates that are owned by Jews
>also a lot of those people are Jewish and that infographic is just wrong.
Nice try. none of the information I posted was refuted

>>12755466
>They have an IQ of 103 after much interbreeding with the white population in America, they are not 113 IQ. China has the highest average IQ at like, 108?
even partial Jews have high degrees of success. look the top billionaires in the USA so many are half jewish.

>>12755465
>this is a leftist argument, but it applies here. if a ethic group of people dominate discourse, of course it's going to have aspects of personal bias and won't reflect the interests of the the other groups. the difference is that leftists usually say that white people are the people that dominate the discourse instead, but that's obviously not true
I'm not blaming white people for oppressing any group. no one should pay for the crimes of their father. it's not even a leftist argument either Thomas Sowell even uses it.

>>12755480
yes only jews do this :)

>>12755482
I'm not trying to refute your information. you're just being a retard and cherry picking only Jewish employees and secondly did you not see my explanation as to why Jews excel in journalism?

Daily reminder that even if jews had an IQ of 130, it wouldn't explain mathematecally their over rappresentation

>>12755416
5his is complet bullshit. I don't know your source but its outdated.


Why would someone lie so brazenly about jews? What kind of motive could they have?

>>12755494
I'm not "cherry picking", Im showing that most of the top positions are Jewish. As I said, 95% of media companies are ultimately owned by Jews, because the conglomeration of media, almost all media is owned by 5 companies that are owned by Jews.

I don't think its just that they "excel at journalism". Most of those people, executives, correspondents, bureau chiefs, CEOs, are not "journalists" and probably never were. They are owners of large conglomerates that have massive influence on how people understand society and history.

And the fact that people were raising these same concerns in the 1920s and have consistently for 100 years tells me its not just individuals excelling, there is obviously a minority with an specific interest in controlling the majority

>>12755490
The book is saying they have a culture of doing this, not that they are the only people to do it.

>>12755487
Yes and this is why people are dubious because the average Jewish IQ in America is 103 but they are over represented in successful fields compared to those of similar IQ brackets.

>>12755506
your cherrypicked top positions, yes.

>>12755500
does the middleman minority explain it along with IQ?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middleman_minority

>>12755487
Many are germans too. Look at trump and bezzo.there's something very strange with germans people.

>>12755494
Anon, Ted Turner doesn't even own CNN anymore. This infographic is incorrect.

>>12755509
>we all do this
>but THE JEWS do it too!!!!

lmao cope. NS is all well and good until you're needed as a scapegoat :P

>>12755487
Thomas Sowell is an economist and a good one, but what I'm talking about is a psychological phenomenon.

>>12755480
>Why are you talking about German National Socialism
Because you asked me here >>12755444 why I was "assuming" that their critique will be beneficial. It has ALREADY BEEN beneficial. Whether it is beneficial or not depends entirely on you. You have to make it beneficial. Don't squander it. Their intent behind it makes no difference, just your intent does.

>>12755516
it says as of 2016 at the top

>>12755509
>Yes and this is why people are dubious because the average Jewish IQ in America is 103 but they are over represented in successful fields compared to those of similar IQ brackets
that's completely false unless you can disprove dozens of studies. google the studies and some are also linked here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jewish_intelligence
>inb4 (((((wikipedia)))
it's sourced

>>12755518
Thomas Sowell has dozens of works on Race, intelligence, overrepresentation etc too

>>12755506
And peoples have forged doculents to prove their delusions for 100 years lile the Prrotocoles or CoC. What's your point?

>>12755517
>they have a culture, a collective whole that fosters this attitude
>as opposed to individuals that do this
why are you posting such an obvious strawman? they have to be subtle to work anon

>>12755538
>individuals don't make up a culture

okay lol

>>12755511
yes, and it goes hand in hand with what Kevin MacDonald says. the minority is going to stick together to protect themselves from the majority, so they'll naturally become very ethnocentrist and have strong ingroup preference. which means that they'll become very nepotistic in how they hire people. that explains why jews stick together so much, but asians-americans don't.

>>12755500
Culture and locations are a good explanation. See the 60% literacy rates among jews during tsarist russia while the average russian had 17%

Finally there's connections and nepotism but antisemits getting assblasted about someone putting their race first would be hypocritcal.

>>12755514
Yeah they largely created the society, very strange indeed

>>12754945
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_supremacy

Black supremacy and black power aren’t the same thing. The label “white power” is mainly used by white supremacist groups so the two terms have become synonymous.

>>12755545
Ah yes and then this explain why they promote the immigrations of other minorities who hate them much more than the host population it makes so much sense!

>that explains why jews stick together so much, but asians-americans don't.
Ah yes everyone know asians aren't a minority in america or that chinatowns doesn't exist.

>>12755546
it would make perfect sense actually. it would demonstrate that ethnonationalist are completely correct in their arguments. if jews are naturally nepotistic that means that individualism and meritocracy are a big pile of bullshit in a multiracial society.

>>12755535
But there were Jews in top positions of media that whole time. Thats not a delusion. And its not because theyre good at muh journalism, they put gentiles as journalists, they are the owners, operators, executives, and narrative controllers.

>>12755531
>dozens of studies
3, which are based off of a 1957 study by Boris Levinson entitled "The Intelligence of Applicants for Admission to Jewish Day Schools" published in Jewish Social Studies,Vol. 19, No. 3/4 (Jul. - Oct., 1957), pp. 129-140.

It had a key fundamental issue however; This study is limited to applicants for Day Schools adhering to the principles of the National Commission for Yeshiva Education. This sampling does not claim to represent the entire Jewish school population or even those children attending yeshiva Day Schools with a different educational emphasis.

Not only this, given the average reported Israeli IQ of 95, and the average reported Jordanian IQ of 84, the claim of an average 115 IQ for Ashkenazi Jews would necessarily require all other Jews to have an average IQ of 84.2. This means that even if Ashkenazi Jews did have a mean IQ of 115, then the average global Jewish IQ would be 107.0. However, on the basis of the original studies pointing out that the reported IQ scores are not indicative of mean or average Ashkenazi IQ, it can be deduced that 107 IQ is higher than the real Jewish average.

>>12755546
Why it is hypocritical?
If I advise a family member against a guy I know, whose a known scammer, am I hypocritical only because if I were in tge guy's shoes I'd do the same?
Why all non-jews of the world (99% of the population) should care about jewish interests?

>>12752798
I bought CofC from amazon little over a year ago.

>>12755551
>destroy rome
>create a religious schism
>marxism
>stinerism
>start WWI over some backwater conflict
>start WWII with the stated goal to exterminate eastern europe
>start the european refugee crisis

Even Nietzsche was ashamed of them. And then they stole his philosophy and bastardized it for their autism.

>>12755531
>dozens of articles
>uses one source
Anon why are you pretending this claim is more sourced than it is?

>>12755554
that's not true. people that use white power have been misconstrued and defamed by the media to look like evil human beings and made the phrase taboo. this was done by jewish media btw.
jewish media has made the simple concept of defending white people's interests a taboo thing.

>>12755564
Please prove it.

>>12755569
>copied and pasted from VoxDay
>>12755578
*sigh*
>However, the average IQ score of Ashkenazi Jews has been calculated to be within the range of 108 to 115 under some studies, which is significantly higher than that of any other ethnic group in the world

http://web.mit.edu/fustflum/documents/papers/AshkenaziIQ.jbiosocsci.pdf
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016028960600033X
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1eed/b19bcf7c059a4b10a9ed8c58027d9ed22bae.pdf
https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4098351,00.html
https://ieet.org/index.php/IEET2/more/pellissier20110719
http://www.ncas.rutgers.edu/sites/fasn/files/How%20Jews%20Became%20Smart%20(2008).pdf
http://pinker.wjh.harvard.edu/articles/media/2006_06_17_thenewrepublic.html
https://web.mit.edu/fustflum/documents/papers/AshkenaziIQ.jbiosocsci.pdf

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601752_Polygenic_Scores_Mediate_the_Jewish_Phenotypic_Advantage_in_Educational_Attainment_and_Cognitive_Ability_Compared_With_Catholics_and_Lutherans

>>12755576
>Germans bad
It doesnt make it weird that they have executives when they are the majority ancestors of the society.

Why you hate germans so much dog?

>>12755584
There's a lot of reasons to see white supremacy as a negative thing but it is telling that any white identity centric movement is demonised as a white supremacist organisation

>>12755584
Please give me an example of a white power group that isn’t a supremacist group.

>>12755589
>copied and pasted from VoxDay
How does that make what was said incorrect?

>>12753316
If you're a blank slate leftist, closed off to the idea of evolution affecting the human mind, you won't get anything out of it. Otherwise you will.

>>12755545
of course minorities stick together. in my town Indians are a minority but they own every single subway (fast-food chain) and single employee is Indian

>>12755600
the sources were also meant for you

>>12755586
I'll let my man here prove it
http://antimatrix.org/Convert/Books/Henry.Ford/The.International.Jew/ij17.html

>>12755592
>see this exemple of a jew doing something bad?
>this is proof they are evil
>but when you point out what german did?
>well golly gee aren't you racist?

I like how you post a random picture from your libshit folder too seems like I ruffled your programming.

>>12755557
You're mistaking the concept of nepotism with ghettos. What I'm trying to say is that Asians don't have the hiring patterns of Jews.

>>12754790
I hasn't worked so far leftypol, but post it 500k more times and maybe it will.

>>12754773
I think that’s the demographic of nearly all growing companies these days. No one else has the concentrated economic power to really make a difference via conventional methods of boycotting.

>>12755619
>cites the protocols
yikes

>>12755619
>Henry "The Protocol are real" Ford

No.

>>12755603
thankfully your Indian food chain owners cannot manipulate your country's democratic system.

>>12755603
Literally everywhere in the world, cabs are run by Indians and Pakistanis. Its not because of their cab driving IQ, its because they have an interest and monopoly in this industry.

The industries that Jews choose to monopolize speak 1,000,000 words about their intentions

>>12755637
1. I don't like democracy
2. what part of Jews having a higher average verbal IQ do you not understand. Jews have great success in law and politics because that's pretty much all verbal

>>12755623
That is supposed to make you laugh, greyface.

>>12755636
>London Times publishes the Protocols in full 1919
>London Times bought by Jewish Astor family 1921
>London Times starts publishing articles about why theyre fake 1922
>This is why theyre known as a forgery.
Jews: when you prove your stereotype in everything you do, even when trying to disprove it
(Thumbs up, sunglasses, jew ball)

>>12755639
You can thank your old Papa Hitler for turning Jews secular and left wing.

>>12755625
>Asians don't have the hiring patterns of jews

Ah yes, Indians for exemple would never do such a thing especially in tech.

>>12755626
Hey its not my fault if you believe in da joos like it was a religion.

>>12755576
WWII was started by Britain.

>>12755651
lol

>>12755646
Right do this jewish manipulation also involve going back in time to write the book it was based on? If so that's pretty impressive.

>>12755576
>Even Nietzsche was ashamed of them.
He was really just ashamed of the herd, as I pointed out earlier in the thread. All herds are the same in that they spoil the whole. German herds, Jewish herds, Anglo-Saxon herds, etc. — all repugnant.

>>12755651
>Germany invades Poland and everyone gets mad
>Britian started it guys

>>12755404
there are more genius iq whites than there are jews as a whole, this argument is useless

>>12755597
Jared Taylor has never said anything mean in his life, but he's constantly painted as a white supremacists and a neo-nazi. I have no reason to believe that the same isn't true for white power.
And while you can point to some crimes committed by white people who have previously uttered the phrase white power, you can easily do the same with black power, yet curiously this rule only applies to white people.

>>12755651
Now businessmen again hesitated to expand their factories, for fear of being burdened with surplus capacity. This was absurd. Goering assured his audience:

No end of the rearmament is in sight. The struggle which we are approaching demands a colossal measure of productive ability . . . The only deciding point in this case is victory or destruction. If we win, then business will be sufficiently compensated . . . It is entirely immaterial whether in every case new investment can be amortized. We are now playing for the highest stakes . . . All selfish interests must be put aside. Our whole nation is at stake. We live in a time when the final battles are in sight. We are already on the threshold of mobilization and are at war, only the guns are not yet firing.

Goering, december 1936.

>>12755668
A no would have been enought anon.

>>12755642
I don't give a shit what you believe in. I want to model my country in such way that its future is determined by its people and not the jewish elite.

>>12755664
40% of 145+ IQ population is Jewish
Jews make up 40% of the 1% according to most of /pol/
hmmmmmmm

>>12755684
*big think*

>>12755684
care to cite either of those?

>>12755661
Britain let communists have Poland at the end of the war, so it's obvious they didn't actually care about the sovereignty of Poland.

>>12755668
I can point to “white power” being the go-to chant for the Klan when they demonstrate in my town. Amazing that you think the media is why nobody else wants the white power label and not common sense by people not wanting to be associated with supremacists who’ve already claimed it.

>>12755661
>Britain divides map after wwii so huge chunks of german population are stranded in poland
>this is fine guys
>the map redrawing is still causing wars today since they deleted kurdistan and put the population in 4 different countries.

>>12755708
I remember seeing an infographic on /pol/ saying that 40% of the 1% is Jewish and from my own research 37/100 US billionaires are Jewish or Half-Jewish
also pic related

>>12752798
Habbedin

>>12755728
lmao is this bait?

>>12755728
>infographic on /pol/

>>12755722
to me it seems like the polish signed the Warsaw pact
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warsaw_Pact

>>12755725
"Black power" was the chant of Black Panther. You only place so much importance on white power chant because media has told you so.

>>12755722
This argument is weirdly naive.

>>12755727
>start a war
>lose
>get your territory taken away
>woooow
>retake it by force
>enslave the local ethnies because most of your men are at war
>plan to kill them once the war is over
>hum excuse me why do you consider me the aggresor?

>>12755754
britain was the aggressor, obviously. They created the problem. Germany asked them for peace in every way possible, but they destroyed them because they were the neocon world police of the time

>>12755765
Rather, they were the proxy army for the ((neocon world police)) of the time

>>12755765
but they still invaded poland even though they supposedly wanted peace

>>12755727
>let's completely forget the part where the Germans slaughtered 1.8 million ethnic poles

>>12755765
>we lost the war but we want you guys to bend over backwards to give us everything now because we find the terms of our surrender that we signed to years ago unacceptable now :)

Lets not pretend that appeasement didn't happen, kiddo.

>>12755765
What do you think of

>>12755673

>>12755776
>appeasement
lol the remilitarization of the rhineland was not appeasement. imagine being told you can roll a tank down your own street.

>>12755786
He saw that the international Jewish financers were moving world powers to start another war?

>>12755775
Ever hear of Lebensraum?

>>12755796
yes

>>12755787
it was part of it yes :)

>>12755798
They were taking back what was theirs.

>>12755802
this has to be bait.

>>12755802
Except it wasn't

>>12755748
The Black Panther Party was a relatively tiny fringe group which killed a couple of cops and those sympathetic to their causes have mostly moved on and refined their stance. The Klan used to be an enormous terror arm of the majority group which killed and threatened substantial numbers of black people with the aim of keeping them in subjugation. Those sympathetic with the aims of the Klan want to go back to that. Surely you can see the difference.

>>12755808
>>12755809
yes it was.

>>12755812
it was bait or it was their land?

>>12755809
>German population lived there
People will never agree on what happened in WWII and what was right or wrong
Let's talk more about the Jewish influence on society, its what this thread should truly be about

>>12755820
>Let's talk more about the Jewish influence on society
>>>/pol/

>>12755820
That doesn't make it Germany's

>>12755811
blacks still kill tons of cops

>>12755820
>Let's talk more about the Jewish influence on society
Okay, let's start with how it indirectly leads to mild insanity in Germans a la Lebensraum.

>>12755820
It's great to have the books balanced!

>>12755808
Danzig is Prussian which is the fucking genesis of what we know as modern Germany. The current Prussian lands are all occupied by Slavs and Germany is just a castrated, headless puppet state for NATO.

>>12755826
NO MORE DEAD COPS!!!!

>>12755836
now it's rightful Slavic territory

>>12755826
Yes I’m sure every crack dealer on the corner knows the black panther platform by heart and is acting in solidarity with it.

>>12755836
Well shit they shouldn't have lost it then lol

oy what is this thread

>>12755852
off topic

>>12755404
Even when accounting for higher Jewish average IQ, there are not enough American Jews to explain their disproportionate representation in the USA by merit alone.

>>12755848
Groups like the BPP and NOI have had a major influence on black culture and their ideologies have been fully incorporated into the African American consciousness.

>>12755848
you're begging the question.

>>12755535
Protocols of Zion is bullshit, sure, but name one forged document used as evidence within Culture of Critique.

>>12755836
Danzig wasn't owned by Poland

>>12755866
Wrong

>>12755865
What part of street crime is uniquely influenced by the black panthers and black power?

>>12755862
Hispanics are dumber than niggers? Is this possible?

>>12755879
the culture of critique could be all factually correct. but the problem is that it could be trying to prove its hypothesis by leaving out certain details or facts

>>12755882
The city of Danzig was an independent state following WW1, but the Danzig Corridor was owned by Poland.

>>12755884
Nothing except a greater willingness and pleasure in causing harm towards the children of Yakub.

>>12755865
But....
WHO STARTED AND OWNS THE NAACP
Black culture, at least the criminal one, is a creation of Jews via music

>>12755886
>t. brainlet
Read the chart again.

>>12755889
>dont use facts to prove a hypothesis thats anti semetic

>>12755889
So in other words your accusation that CoC featured forged documents was complete bullshit. Got it.

>>12755886
No that chart says niggers are by far the dumbest

>>12755899
>>12755900
>I don't know what cherry picking is

>>12755909
>changing the goalposts

>>12755909
>Talking about the relationship between specific things is cherry picking

>>12755918
correlation is not causation

>>12755914

i never moved them. i literally said it was cherry picking in different words
>the problem is that it could be trying to prove its hypothesis by leaving out certain details or facts
>by leaving out certain details or facts
>leaving out facts

>>12755926
>i never moved them. i literally said it was cherry picking in different words
seriously?
>And peoples have forged doculents to prove their delusions for 100 years lile the Prrotocoles or CoC. What's your point?
do you think I don't have the patience to click a chain of replies? fuck off cunt. I have no time for your bullshit.

>>12755932
> I have no time for your bullshit.
good, the thread has hit 300 replies and I'm going to read now, bye

>>12755893
Black americans culture actually comes from the irish Thomas Sowell has a pretty good book aboit that.

>>12755932
That was me actually not whoever you're responding too

>>12755948
>choosing to defend somebody else's argument that is substantially different from your own views
don't be a brainlet, anon. if you have a distinction to make, state it outright instead of choosing dumb arguments as your hill to die on.

>>12755925
That does not apply here.
Jewish movements are correlated
Cause is identified as a similar interest uniting the movements

>>12755956
I don't base my opinion of Christianity off of Opus Dei

>>12755950
What ? I'm shopping for chicken right now chill out and wait a bit bro

>>12755968
are you too addicted to 4chan to avoid embarrassing yourself in public with it? cringe

>>12755968
>not owning a legitimate chicken coop
Wow this is the year of 2019

>>12755973
imagine being this much of an onionsman

>>12755963
Lol.
But if a Christian minority was in a country and dozens of groups sharing the agenda of Opus Dei emerged on all fronts of power in society you would.

Almost as weak as saying correlation causation

>>12755981
no I wouldn't, that would be stupid.

>>12755984
Well you should. If in Bangladesh or a Muslim minority country, christians took over the intellectual positions of power and started trying to change the population to weaken them in various ways, you should question those groups.

>>12756001
Majority*

>>12756001
why would I let the minority of a group determine how I think of the whole? Should I indulge in white guilt also?

>>12756001
Then imagine the hubris of them saying, “but it’s because of Christian iq!”

>>12756001
And that is exactly why I'm anti-Zionist, in its present form at least. But this blanket pol hate is just unproductive, irrational and selfish scapegoating

>>12755973
Right so here I am

MacDonald notes that of the top 21 American intellectuals according to peer ratings in the 1970s (Kadushin 1974), 15 were Jewish (and most were New York Intellectuals). Eleven of these 15, he says, were “‘significantly influenced by Freudian theory at some point in their careers,’” and 10 of those 11 held “liberal or radical political beliefs at some period of their career” (MacDonald 1998a:141, quoting/citing Torrey 1992:185). The implication is that these influential Jewish intellectuals promoted Freudianism to undermine gentile culture and advance their ethnic interests. But MacDonald leaves out some crucial information.

The 15 Jews among the top 21 intellectuals were (1) Daniel Bell, (2) Chomsky, (3) Irving Howe, (4) Norman Mailer, (5) Robert Silvers, (6) Susan Sontag, (7) Lionel Trilling, (8) Hannah Arendt, (9) Saul Bellow, (10) Paul Goodman, (11) Richard Hofstadter (Jewish father), (12) Irving Kristol, (13) Herbert Marcuse, (14) Norman Podhoretz, and (15) David Riesman. A closer look shows that only two or three of these cases support MacDonald’s thesis, and several are clear counterexamples. First off, five of these intellectuals are, by MacDonald’s criteria, unambiguously anti-Israel and therefore opposed to Jewish interests. Chomsky was (and still is) arguably the world’s leading critic of Israel. Mailer tended to sympathize with the Palestinians (Theodoracopulos 2015). When Sontag accepted the Jerusalem Prize in 2001, she used the occasion to condemn Israel (Cockburn 2001). Marcuse (who will be discussed in more detail below) advocated the return of Arab refugees to Israel, ending Jewish control of the country (Marcuse 2005:181). Arendt was the student, promoter, and lover (in a romantic sense) of the Nazi philosopher Martin Heidegger. She was best known for her book Eichmann in Jerusalem (Arendt 1963), in which she argued that Israeli laws were comparable to the Nazi Nuremberg laws and that holocaust-orchestrator Eichmann had been given a “show trial” and was not a particularly bad person (just that he was prompted to do bad things by circumstances beyond his control—though she faults him for not being brave enough to protest). In 1948, Arendt (along with Einstein, Sidney Hook, and 24 other prominent Jews) signed a letter to the New York Times which described the political party of Menachem Begin as “closely akin in its organization, methods, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties” (Shatz 2004:65).

Another intellectual on the list, Saul Bellow, was a conservative who opposed feminism, multiculturalism, and political correctness. Bellow urged Allan Bloom, another Jewish academic at the University of Chicago, to write The Closing of the American Mind (Bloom 1987), one of the most influential pro-traditionalist academic books in the past few decades (Ahmed and Grossman 2007).

>>12756015
You can accurately assess the influence of these groups and their consequences without having to judge anybody

>>12756045
It is ironic that MacDonald casts Robert Silvers as a part of a nefarious Jewish Freudian movement. In the paragraph immediately following the one in which he introduces this list of 15 Jewish intellectuals, MacDonald writes:
The link between psychoanalysis and the political left, as well as the critical role of Jewish-controlled media in the propagation of psychoanalysis, can be seen in the recent uproar [over] Frederick Crews’s critiques of the culture of psychoanalysis. The original articles were published in the New York Review of Books . . . (1988a:141).

Silvers is the longtime editor of the New York Review of Books, and one of the 11 whom MacDonald identifies as being influenced by Freud.1
Bell, Hofstadter, and Riesman were liberals, though not particularly extreme, not known for promoting Freud, and not seriously involved in Jewish causes. (Bell 1962:16 described his perspective as “anti-ideological, but not conservative,” and he criticized utopian schemes such as Marxism as well as aspects of the prevailing social order.) Trilling may have been a nominal Marxist in the 1930s (D. Sidorsky, personal communication), though he evinced little interest in Jewish causes and his ethnic awareness seemed to be triggered mainly when he faced anti-Semitism. Goodman had no apparent interest in his fellow Jews, though he identified as an anarchist, so by MacDonald’s criteria might be considered an enemy of gentile culture. Howe was a liberal who supported as well as criticized Israel. That leaves the neoconservatives Kristol and Podhoretz. Kristol and Podhoretz became decidedly anti-liberal, though later in their careers they openly and aggressively supported Israel, Jewish interests, and, in Podhoretz’s case, unfettered immigration to the US.

The naive reader of The Culture of Critique would think that 11 of 15 top Jewish intellectuals were using Freudianism to attack the traditions of gentile culture while promoting separatism for Jews in the US and in Israel. MacDonald makes this conclusion fairly explicit:
Of these [15 Jewish intellectuals], only Noam Chomsky could possibly be regarded as someone whose writings were not highly influenced by his Jewish identity and specifically Jewish interests. The findings taken together indicate that the American intellectual scene has been significantly dominated by specifically Jewish interests and that psychoanalysis has been an important tool in advancing these interests (1988a:154, n. 15—partially quoted earlier).

But the evidence reviewed above suggests that this is a serious distortion of the facts.

>>12756046
>You can judge groups of people without actually judging anybody in that group!

The power of polshit

>>12756058
>>12756045
>>12755950
Right so he's talking out of his ass, ok?

>>12756058
nazis btfo lmao

>>12754768
Indeed -- Jews often make the same claims themselves, in friendly conversation.

>>12756045
>Jews dindu nuffin, one of them liked Heidegger and a few didn’t like the openly criminal state of Israel

Command center, we need to step up our presence on lit, they seem to know

>>12756102
Shit wrong field. Janitor 45 can you delete these, you know who you are

>>12756103
>>>/v/

>>12756045
Haven’t read the book, but I think the crux of it is that Jews take actions which benefit their group in the west at the detriment to it. Not that they’re all Zionist’s or even all in cahoots or agree. If you brought in the Israel question though, surely you would only strengthen Mac Donald’s thesis

>>12755597
Ethnonationalists and so on. The problem is that practically, if one wanted a place without any certain group of people, then one will have to physically remove them.