/lit/ - Literature

>>12087387
wtf why is this stickied????

>>12087387
Based Nick

>>12087387
based

Simply epic thread, based and amphetamined.

>>12087387
*ahem* FUCK JANNIES

I can’t believe Jannies actually stickied this

>>12087387
cringe

this shit only fits /tv/

incredible courage to say what we’ve all been thinking

>>12087525
Clean it up, janny.

>>12087387
baste

based and niggerpilled

>>12087387
how the FUCK did this get stickied!?

>>12087387
Ahem, FUCK NIGGERS AND FUCK JANNIES

>>12087387
reeeee delet
t. janitor

LOL

Reminder that accelerationism is the frankenstein twin of reformism and won't work.

>>12089840
what a manchild lmao

>>12089840
how so?

great thread, total evidence of the /lit/ demographic replacement by cross boarders

>>12089840

Anarchism doesn't really fit with Accelerationism, neither does the NRx that Land proposed does for that matter, but that's another story. The closest thing to an Accelerationist politics,is the idea of unconditional accelerationism that some people have put out. Some elements of anarchism could have accelerationist characteristics, but anarchism by itself is a moralisitic world view of the world and ultimately doesn't fit.

>>12090579
>anarchism by itself is a moralisitic world view
how so?

>>12090548
Because as Marx said, you can't reform your way out of capitalism. Trying to "accelerate" capitalism into socialism is like trying to reform it into socialism, it can't be done.

>>12090579
That image was just a joke really, I wasn't trying to say accelerationism is like anarchism.

>>12090594

Anarchism since it begun, is politically deontological, it assumes an ideal state of man which is that he can be stateless. Marxism as a theory in its OG form doesn't have moral side to it, but merely predicates outcomes on a materialist basis. This is the original schism that drove out Bakunin. Most people ignore this, but Land comes out of the Marxist tradition, which is hard determinism and takes capital as the drive of history, not social groups that force ideal situations unto the world like anarchists. Land begins from a Marxist stand point with capital as that which augments the worker and dispenses with human agency. One could say Land is philosophically still a Marxist theoretically , and accelerationism is Marxist even though it doesn't view communism as an endgoal. NRx doesn't really fit accelerationism either unless it includes chaos and destruction as its program and the collapse of liberalism. In other words Accelerationism is ideologically agnostic but still theoretically tied to the Marxist view of Capital as an autonomous agent, that upgrades or erodes whatever previous political structures existed. There is no political endgame here other than acceleration itself, that is the point of Land, and we serve it despite our knowledge of it or agency, because we are participants in something that trumps morality.

>>12087387
Bataille and meatsackpilled