/lit/ - Literature

>>11731821
I know this is a bait thread but just in case read the Bell curve.

>>11731834
That's not what OP asked for.

>>11731821
Bell Curve

>>11731821
try asking on >>>/polddit/

>>11731837
it's what he needed.

OP read Guns Germs and Steel, try to find something that repudiates it's claims at the same time.

use these as mere "starters" in order to look up more information found in the citations as you see fit

>>11731821
Richard Lynn and Charles Murray's oeuvre

>>11731821
Bell Curve and 10000 year Explosion

>>11732001
>Everybody has to think like me. They shouldn't read the books they want to.

>>11732023
>not realizing that, due to the medium of the message, that comment, regardless of the authority of its language, can't be anything more than a suggestion by anon and OP is free to do whatever he wants but should consider that, when asking a question online, he is vulnerable to have the validity of his question questioned and maybe with good reason

>>11732091
So, every time someone asks for a book on a given subject we should just give them our particular sides political propaganda?

>>11732114
>implying that any individual's opinion isn't just micro-propaganda

>>11732156
>Being this much of a slave to ideology

>>11732195
>not realizing what I said concurs with Zizek's views on ideology

we should autoban anyone who uses the words "any good books on/about"

>>11732288
It concurs with his diagnosis of ideology as universal and the farcical nature of Liberal pseudo-apolitia but your original post was an expression of Liberal pseudo-apolitia in itself so fuck it.

>>11732001
>Read Duns, Germs and Steel goy!

Just look at the fucking studies you retard

even if there is a difference, imbeciles come in all colours and you will always remain as one of them

>>11733011
>Taking statistical averages into account makes you a dumb racist that supports drumpf

QED

>>11733038
↓
>>11733030

>>11733038
Your point was nothing but an adhom.

Understanding Human History: An Analysis Including the Effects of Geography and Differential Evolution

>>11732353
>>11732344
>>11732023
>>11732019
>>11732009
>>11731840
>>11731837
>>11731826
You're not welcome here, /pol/
Time to go back

>>>/pol/

>>11733399
Suck a dick /leftypol/. You've ruined this board with petty politics.

>"OP here give me books on topic X"
>anons respond
>leftypol arives kvetching like it's time for another shoa "y-you're not welcome here, bad goys!"
>thread derailes
Day of the rope can't come soon enough if only for the fact alone that you people ruin everything you touch.

>>11733407
politics are a noble and literary pursuit. Racism and antisemitism is not!

>>11733450
>day of le rope
gb2 leddit sweatie, it will only ever happen in your small-minded racist dreams

>>11733458
>Politics is only my side
>The other side is just Waysism
You're a fucking baby.

>>11733467
not an argument.

>>11733471
The argument is pointing out your hypocrisy and the black & white naiveté with which you view the world. You think that your ends justify shitting up /lit/ with your ill-formed propaganda but can't stand that you opponents do the same because 'they're the meany heads'.
Meanwhile, calling people Racists is an actual non-argument.

>tfw not even /lit/ is mature enough to discuss serious topics
>tfw no feelings anymore

>>11733490
ad hominem and STILL not an argument.

how can /pol-smokers be THIS bad at debate?!?!

>>11733504
Please, point out my ad hominem since I already pointed out yours.
You won't be able to find one in my last post so I'll help you out by saying something really insulting. I bet you're a SocDem.

>>11731821
The History and Geography of Human Genes, RIP Luigi Cafalli-Sforza, related authors are Cochran, Harpending, Lynn, Vanhanen, Rushton, and of course Jensen. All of the newer books (Wade's, Reich's) that get NYT reviews are loaded with crimestopping goodthink to prevent the author from simply getting lynched. Or just peruse through Sailer's HBD bibliography site and La Griffe if you want technicals.

>>11733513
>Please, point out my ad hominem since I already pointed out yours.
>You won't be able to find one in my last post so I'll help you out by saying something really insulting. I bet you're a SocDem.
You just don't know when to quit. You're embarrassing yourself.

Any book on IQ differences among sexual deviants?

>>11733521
Oh look. You posted a meme to cover up the fact that you don't have anything to say other than "racist".
Still, waiting for you to show me that ad hominem that I apparently used btw.

>>11733536
>moving the goalposts
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>11733539
>If I shout out enough logical fallacies dat I don't know de meaning of, den he'll think I'm de wonner of dis aregumint.

>>11733550
I would never deign to argue with (You) because you're nothing but an roach to someone as intelligent as me.

>>11733555

>>11733558

>>11731821
Um... so I don't know if a Trumpkin like you would know this, but IQ is a social construct. It literally means nothing. Go back to /pol/ for your uneducated racist rants, this board is for enlightened discussion only.

https://www.nyu.edu/gsas/dept/philo/faculty/block/papers/Heritability.html
http://www.unz.com/article/closing-the-black-white-iq-gap-debate-part-i/#p_1_22

murray BTFO

>>11733804
>IQ is a social construct

>>11734037
it is
the internet is your friend. now fuckoff back to /pol/

>>11734057

>>11733558

>>11734037
IQ is a tool created by people to try and measure intelligence, how the hell is it not a social construct

>>11734037
>Thinking that Social Construction means that it is not real or of any social value

>>11734114
Everything is a social construct, including your interpretation of reality and existanc. Good lor is there anything more pathetic than relativists?

>>11731826
is it legit or a meme

>>11734156
babies first red pills

>>11734156
meme

>>11734132
That's not an argument. Anon is correct; you're butthurt about reality.

>>11734163
Explain yourself. One can get the data quicker online but it's a good starter for those actually knew to the concept.

>>11734179
It's an explanation for why the description "social construct" is absolutey useless.

I'll just leave this here so I can see how BLACKED subscribers try to refute reality.

Daily reminder that Arthur Jensen is dead.

>>11733804
not even the good kind of b8, but I appreciate the effort

>>11733558

>>11731821
Why are wh*Toids so proud of just being above niggers in terms of iq

>>11734313
Now post the one with Ashkenazi Jews vs others. You're barely above niggers wh*Toid

>>11731821

>How IQ works
Ian J. Deary - Intelligence: A Short Introduction (good short primer to intelligence research).

Robert Plomin - Behavioral Genetics (standard textbook)

Arthur Jensen - The g Factor (excellent overview of how IQ works),

>The controversial stuff about how niggers are retarded

Richard Lynn - IQ and the Wealth of Nations (WARNING: Contains some systematic errors pointed out by Wickerts but is largely accurate).

Herrnstein and Murray - The Bell Curve (not because it's the most up-to-date, but because it's by far the most important).

Arthur Jensen - Bias in Mental Testing

James Flynn - What is Intelligence? Beyond The Flynn Effect (egalitarian POV)

Richard Nisbett - Intelligence and How To Get It (egalitarian POV)

Michael Levin - Why Race Matters

>>11732001
Guns Germs and Steel gives next to no information on IQ differences between ethnic groups.

>>11733450
Don't worry just ignore them and suggest literature. In one ear, out the other, posting whatever you want.

>>11736320
ain't no negro ever built a thing like this.

>>11733458
>politics are a noble and literary pursuit. Racism and antisemitism is not!

Literally the complete opposite way around

>>11731821
>books that make feel less stupid and if possible superior to other people?
pathetic.

>>11736320
two standard deviations or three if you're including central and south Africans.
>inb4 Doesn't that disprove the whole theory.
No. Most American Blacks are West Africans and have similar average iq to Nigerians, Angolans, etc. American Black are the creame of the sub-Saharan crop.

>>11736325
Average Jew IQ is 95 and Askenazi, if they wouldn't only pcik their best from the smallest most group with most european admixture would be something aound 100, not 115. Meanwhile euroepans get counted together with niggers and turks which live their and have their citizenship, while it's atcually more like 107 in northern europe.

Nothing but ewish tricks and using the verbal IQ as the general IQ: Jews can nothing but lie great lies.

Bell curve and it's outdated and includes data gathered by a clearly bias white supremacist to get it's racial IQ stats for Africans.

>>11736943
>bell curve
>white supremacist
>co-written by jews, makin them be the smartest
It's nearly as if you haven't read it.

>>11736955
I didn't say the book was white supremacist nimrod.

>>11736958
>gathered by a clearly bias white supremacist
Jews aren't white and Murray is far from a white supremacist suporting the idea that kikes are the smartest. Now go neck yourself you pseud.

As a black man i believe in the fact that IQ varies between ethnic groups.

Whew, this thread is bad. /pol/ invasion into lit is real. It's weird, boomers go everywhere they presume to be intelligent and make it dumb. I wonder if there are any good books on IQ differences among political groups, age groups?

>>11733458
Lol politics, racism, and antisemitism are some of the least noble persuits

>>11737904
>relativists talking about noble anything

Why must /pol/ ruin everything

>>11732001
Guns, Germs ans Steel completely fails to take into account the pre-younger dryas civilizations which existed, and relocated across the globe; transferring their astrological and architectural and agricultural knowledge to hunter gatherer groups after the onset of the holocene extinction.

His map of human development is a fabrication which predicts nothing.

>>11733558

kek