/lit/ - Literature

>nowhere to go
save for out of your mom's basement

>>11474920
did you go Heidegger-Gadamer route

>>11474920

All of those people root their ideas in that something has fundamentally gone wrong in the modern world. This is actually the flowering of the seed that is western culture. You need to go back in time to before the Kali Yuga began, before western culture separated from the rest, the age of the Hyperboreans where magic and heroism were as normal as obesity and television are today, the teachings passed down from this era and later doctrines that develop the ideas from this era contain the key to rejuvenating the present. Read the Vedas, Vedanta, I Ching, Egyptian and Babylonian texts and read books on the Indo-Europeans.

>>11474935
I went through the Heidegger-Dugin route.

>>11474920
*deep breath, filling my lungs*

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEENAAAAAAAAAAAY!

FUUUUUUUUUUUUCKIIIIIIIIIING!

GIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIRAAAAAAAAAAAARD!

*another deep breath*

GOOOOOO TOOOOOOO!

FUUUUUUUUCKIIIIING!

CHUUUUUUUUUUUUURCH!

>>11474920
Go out and live in the forest you fucking muppet

>>11474939
>Land
>gone wrong in the modern world

>>11474928
Rekt
>>11474935
>>11474940
Heidegger-Derrida route is best
>>11474939
Have you tried Benveniste's Dictionary?

>>11474940
Dugin related as much Heidegger as Zizek related to Hegel.

>>11474955
>missing out on the Sea-based vs Land-based civilizational struggle = dasein in modernity optional content

Spengler

>>11474967
Irrelevant since Evola.

>>11474920
Go back to the start
And by the start I mean kindergarden!
>>>/toy/

>>11474961
You can get that through Nick Land.
>>11474959
Hey! I like Zizek...

>>11474928
>>11474920

>>11475060
Nick Land is afraid of the Outside now. He would never go back.

>>11474928
Projecting much?

WE LIVE
IN
A
SOCIETY

Revisit the classics. Read any Roman/Greek work you might've not read yet.

>>11474920
Well maybe instead of complaining about life you could try and find some solutions

>>11474947
I can't think of anything more painful than the existence of a person in England
I hate but also pity you anglos

>>11474920
These 3 authors have nothing to do with each other. You're just an impressionable pseud who gets his opinions from a Burmese toy soldier collecting forum

>>11474920
>land, evola, kaczynski

retard. read Burnham, Francis, Pareto, Schmitt, Mosca, Robert Michels, and Lippmann if you want an actual reactionary understanding of the world and society

>>11474920
Bernard Stiegler, Yuk Hui, Sloterdijk, Simondon, Karatani, Laruelle, Galloway, Byung Chul-Han, Berardi, Stengers, Morton, Harman, Garcia, Meillassoux, Adrian Johnston, Manuel DeLanda, Levi Bryant, Agamben

>>11475060
>>11475087
He's going back

>>11474920
But it does though?

>>11474920
Welp, back to pynchon

>>11476674
this is the correct answer, although u can definitely skip levi bryant and I would add zupancic, moten, and lingis

also you mention evola with land but not bataille? bataille is way more interesting than either desu, read erotism, accursed share, and theory of religion

>>11476747
hate the fucking desu autocorrect, kill me now

>>11476759
encyclopedia acephelica is badass af too

I also think michael martin and adrian pabst have some interesting things on the christian side of philosophy.

>>11476771
literally everything atlas press puts out is a must-read

haven't heard of martin/pabst what should I check out?

>>11476775
Martin is kinda on the mystical side. Radical orthodoxy with more esotericism. Check out Submerged Reality if you want. It's about kinda neoplatonic hermetic sophianic traditions within catholicism and attempts to show how they can fit in with and enrich the orthodox positions.

Pabst did some book called Metaphysics: The Creation of Hierarchy which is pretty interesting critique of horizontal ontology in favor of the existence of at least some vertical relations.

Land is a fag, have you read him?

>>11476804

>>11476833

>>11476837

>>11476842

>martin lings
>mircea eliade
>rene guenon
>mosca, pareto and robert michels
>francis parker yockey
>ersnt junger
>carl schmitt
>otto weininger
>spengler
>rosenberg
>thomas carlyle
>houellebecq
>girard
>guillaume faye

>>11474920
Into the Woods?

>>11476848
im sorry, but is this supposed to be impressive?

>>11474920
Yes there is dummy. It's time to induce your own psychosis and write your own manifesto. Start tripping on DPH and huffing glue daily.

>>11474920

>>11474920
un-ironic wokeness and Intersectional Feminism what else?

>>11474920
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerk_(physics)

Read Ratzinger, and realize that the only true escape from the modern world is to transcend it.

>>11474920
You can go back to pine tree emoji twitter anytime you want

>>11477174
i guess im just a liberal in denial and find the prospect of normality terrifying. I feel like the contrarian posturing options are running out. I just want to live in disneyland, is that too much to ask?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJSsbXDBWXs

>>11474935
Gadamer is based, nice to see /lit/ talk about him. Hermeneutics are gonna blow up in the next 8 years, heard it here first bois

>>11477131
Fuck off Sean.

Hegel

watch lord of the rings
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sh36Ys0hxoE

>>11474920
The Decline of the West - Oswald Spengler

>>11474939
land doesnt say anything has gone "wrong". he just says humanity was always doomed from the start

>>11477542
Land's a doped up space case

>>11474920
has this coward ever addressed the jq?

>>11477554
no u

>>11477554
but youve never even read land you insecure brainlet

>>11477578
Indeed I have, but that's not really the point

>>11476790
This seems interesting, what is it about?

>>11477966
It's got a cool name but sounds pretty gay.
>The iconoclastic Brazilian anthropologist and theoretician Eduardo Viveiros de Castro, well known in his discipline for helping initiate its “ontological turn,” offers a vision of anthropology as “the practice of the permanent decolonization of thought.” After showing that Amazonian and other Amerindian groups inhabit a radically different conceptual universe than ours—in which nature and culture, human and nonhuman, subject and object are conceived in terms that reverse our own—he presents the case for anthropology as the study of such “other” metaphysical schemes, and as the corresponding critique of the concepts imposed on them by the human sciences. Along the way, he spells out the consequences of this anthropology for thinking in general via a major reassessment of the work of Claude Lévi-Strauss, arguments for the continued relevance of Deleuze and Guattari, dialogues with the work of Philippe Descola, Bruno Latour, and Marilyn Strathern, and inventive treatments of problems of ontology, translation, and transformation. Bold, unexpected, and profound, Cannibal Metaphysics is one of the chief works marking anthropology’s current return to the theoretical center stage.

>>11474944
yeesh

>>11476674
good list

>>11474920
Return to the Greeks

>>11477556
intelligence > everything

Hi my name is Ian. I would also like to know the answers. Where do I go now?
>>11476674 How should I approach this big list?

>>11478354
Same goes for this list >>11476881

>>11477220
What makes you say that?

bump

>>11478063
>implying I read the Greeks
Aristotle is literally a Roman fabrication.

>>11478354
>How should I approach this big list?
Chul-han you can probably just pick up depending on the title, they're usually pretty short and straightforward.
Skip Harman, Morton, Meillassoux, Bryant, read Whitehead, Brassier, Shaviro's Universe of Things and Wolfendale's Noumena's New Clothes instead. Then read Laurelle.
Read Heidegger for Yuk Hui. Read Spengler if you haven't though, Hui hasn't so misses a lot out, Evola won't have given you a clear picture.