/lit/ - Literature

>>11298652
harry potter

>>11298652
The bible

>>11298652
fear and trembling for just mentioning isaac and abraham

>>11298652
>tfw the bible invented postmodernism 2000 years ago
>tfw it went completely over this dweeb's head

>>11298662
the holy quran

>>11298658
Correct

>>11298697
gravity's rainbow

>>11298652
>man should rely on his education
>a book written in a time when no such concept existed
Why are atheists such intellectually dishonest hacks?

>>11298697
naked lunch?

>>11298672
I have no idea what you're talking about. What do you think postmodernism is?

>>11298652
>conscious

Conscious what? Conscious choices, decisions, conscious-ness? SAY WHAT! SAY IT!

Also, he's proving the Word correct in that those of the world can't comprehend what is spiritually appraised. There is profound symbolism, revelation, and even prophecy within the Abrahamic incident he referenced. He cannot comprehend it because he already appraised the book before he read it, and, as the Good Book says, "he who judges a matter before hearing it, it is folly and shame to him (paraphrased from Proverbs)."

>>11298697
50 shades????

You can clearly see his name is Luke.

>>11298700
Not a clue, but I want to know.

>>11298718
Whatever the book was, it couldn't have been a more excruciating read than his review.

>>11298733
lord of the rings

>>11298730
>>11298700
Its crime and punishment desu~

>>11298700
Crime and Punishment

>>11298697
The legacy of totalitarianism in a tundra

>>11298733
Child of God
>waste of a few days
What a brainlet

The boomer strikes again

>>11298774
Mein Kampf: A Companion Piece

>>11298652
>its another episode of "atheists think hell is a scare tactic"

>>11298785
whether it is or isn't, that's what it's used as.

>>11298718
huck finn or tom sawyer

>>11298785
At his most base level, it is.

>>11298697
harry potter

>>11298774
12 Rules

>>11298785
What do you think hell is?

>>11298985
IJ

>>11298946
Do you think prison is a scare tactic?

>>11299034
Yes, it is used to deter criminals. It can also be used to punish them. Is that what you think Hell is also? A punishment? Because it's a pretty shitty punishment considering it doesn't exist.

>>11298946
Other people

>>11299034
you're an idiot.

>>11298662
He hates it!

>>11298697
>>11298762 or Hypersphere for sure

>>11298700
Bugs......easy on the question marks

>>11298652
How do they do it? To read a book, a small book, and not understand a single fucking point, and don't even have a slightest doubt that there's maybe something they failed to understand.

>>11298652
>had of asked me

Is there a greater pleb filter than the Dick?

>>11299110
>women

>>11299056
Deterring someone is a scare tactic? But if you believe a scare tactic is simply that, then how could you criticize hell for doing it? And, yes, hell is a punishment. What did you think the Bible meant in Matthew 25:46? Oh right, you don't read anything critical of your own ideology.

>>11299110
>the reader
I'm becoming more and more suspicious of people who use this expression

This isn't a one star review, but the whole thing is a train wreck.
> furry persona picture
> feminism
> transexuality
> buzzwords
> inability to like anything that doesn't confirm to personal opinion

>>11298652
Materialism is a mental illness

>>11298985
Has to be Infinite Jest

>>11299531
Candide?

Okay, this is epic xD

>>11299540
Nope

>>11298781

>>11299531
Don Quixote?

>>11299141
>implying ppl care about some shitty jewish writings

>>11298662
it looks like dancehall lyrics 'ate her titty' or smth

>>11299513
every fucking time

It always amazes me that people will write reviews for books they don’t finish

>>11298662
the satanic verses

>>11299510
What book

>>11298718
Sound and the fury

>>11299542
Bible

>>11299643
It's the first review for the short story collection
"I have no mouth, and I must scream"

holy f it's jay z

>>11299664
Book of the New Sun

>>11299531
He should be slapped

>>11299531
Don Quixote

>>11299573
>>11299711
Si

>>11298781

>>11299057

>>11299834
cringe

>>11299072
DOPAMINE!
ENDORPHINS!
ADRENALINE!

>>11299512
He makes it sound pretty fun.

>>11298697
Totalitarianism in a Tundra

>>11300010
*xer

>>11299542
either LotR or the bible

>>11298774
beyond good and evil

>>11299644
Yes

g'dammit why are none of the people who are posting the screen caps saying what book they are from, I actually want to know

>>11301003

>>11299144
Too many people seem to think that an author writes a book for the reader and not for himself.

>>11301027
sorry, jews stole the image I meant to attach

>>11299141
I criticize hell for being a scare tactic because it's, like I said, not real. It's a fake scare tactic. It's just used to manipulate people.

>>11299542
His profile picture looks like a basedboy meme

>>11298992
>>11299522
Nope.

>>11299542
Idk why people still think this is clever or funny when they are just mimicking the thousands of other people who have essentially written the same exact joke.

>>11299072
kaiji reference?

>>11298652
>>11298658
Holy shit. That's what he gets out of Fear and Trembling?

>>11301218
when the fuck did they add that filter? Was trying to say he looks like a stereotypical s-o-y-b-o-y

>>11299110
>long winded
>chapters are 2-3 pages long
What a brainlet

>>11298781

>>11299110
At least she finished it, more than most of you plebs can say.

>>11301496
Thucydides?

>>11301509
Yeah

>>11301737

>>11301554
catch-22?

>>11301756
nope

>>11299514
this
i was reading this article this morning and it actually makes me quite angry
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/06/theres-no-such-thing-as-free-will/480750/

>According to Harris, we should acknowledge that even the worst criminals—murderous psychopaths, for example—are in a sense unlucky. “They didn’t pick their genes. They didn’t pick their parents. They didn’t make their brains, yet their brains are the source of their intentions and actions.” In a deep sense, their crimes are not their fault. Recognizing this, we can dispassionately consider how to manage offenders in order to rehabilitate them, protect society, and reduce future offending. Harris thinks that, in time, “it might be possible to cure something like psychopathy,” but only if we accept that the brain, and not some airy-fairy free will, is the source of the deviancy.

how the fuck do people think like this

>>11301799
it's literally correct though, are you retarded?

>>11301799
if there is no free will, how can bad people will themselves to become good?

>>11301799
The Last Psychiatrist talked about this. Society is relabeling behavioral issues as medical issues rather than legal ones. This is dangerous for civil liberties—you have the right to a speedy trial if you’re problem is only legal, but you can be put on a psychiatric hold indefinitely if it’s medical. The postmodern zeitgeist is to reject that man can’t be “evil.” He can only be ill.

>>11302069
*reject that man can be evil

>>11299573
>>11299774
>>11299531
>Don Quixote
>sexism
What?
Did the guy skip the part about Marcela?

>>11301799
but it is obviously true. Im all for killing criminals, i dont care if they had no choice, but it is technically not their fault that they are like that

>>11302235
>it is obviously true
It's obviously stupid, that's all it is. We know pretty much nothing about the mind, how it works and if (and how) it can be "free".
What you call "obviously true" is just a believe, something completely unproven. We even have proven evidence the mind (whatever it is) can influence materialisitc processes -> see for example the prove of the placebo effect which shouldn't be possible from a strictly materialistic point of view (that means: if the mind didn't have any influence on your acts at all).

>>11302299
if you think about free will for like 30 seconds you will understand that it's incoherent. It doesnt matter how the mind works, it doesnt matter even if we have eternal souls, the idea just doesn mean anything

this conversation is literally always pointless though, so let's just agree to disagree

>>11299072
lol

>>11302307
>if you think about free will for like 30 seconds you will understand that it's incoherent
If it wasn't a thread about something completely differenct, I'd ask you to spare those 30s to tell me why the concept of free will (something people thought about for like 2000 years) is incoherent, but well,
>let's just agree to disagree

>>11302366
well thing a is caused by thing b. including your actions. so if you follow the chain of causality backwards...

>>11302366
and as to why we have thought about it so long it's because people dont like the idea obviously. they dont like thinking of themselves as being ultimately a sort of squishy robot, and we all have the feeling of agency when we do stuff

to don my fedora for a second, its the same reason we have spent so long debating the existence of an omnipotent benevolent being, and an afterlife of eternal bliss

>>11298697
Troutfishing in america?

>>11299110
>The conversations, or soliloquies
BTFO

>>11299890
Where do you think you are

>>11302394
Well, if evolution just established a mind to be a passive observer of our robotic acts, we'd spend a lot of engergy for absolutely nothing. Since spending energy for absolutely nothing isn't exactly an evolutionary advantage, why does one of the most succesful organisms out there, obviously have a mind?

Don't get me wrong, I don't think we have a free will in the absolute sense of the word, but completely negating a certain freedom of choice of our acts (being a robot) doesn't make sense as well.

>>11301737
The French part makes me think it's something by Miller

>>11302492
i guess robot is a bad word

i think we are free in the sense that we can evaluate things and then choose the one we think makes the most sense or whatever we want the most, but it is all technically a series of causal events that lead outside our control if you follow them backwards

>>11298781

>>11302498
Nope
That's misleading. There's barely any French (or any languages other than English) in the book at all

>>11298700
Mysteries by Hamsun?

2 stars, but whatever

>>11304069
Siddharta?

>>11298697
sense & sensibility

>>11300973
>>11298940
>>11298781
Its the quran

>>11298733
Silence of the Lambs (lester is typo/autocorrect)

>>11299110
It really is the stupidity litmus test. And I don't mean that people who don't 'get' it are stupid, but people who's reviews go off half-cocked on insane rants whose only reference point is their own effortless personal enjoyment - they are.

>>11301554
Some Hemingway?

>>11304093
Yes.
Kind of an easy one, but I find it pretty funny.

>>11304129
nope

>>11301783
give the answer then dumbass

>>11301554
Life: A User's Manual

>>11304406
>>11301554
war and peace now that I think about it

>>11298662
Moby-Dick

>>11298700
>reading crime and punishment for the thrill

>>11304343
>>11304419
yep, war and peace

>>11304433
It gave me the thrill, though

>>11298658
This

>>11301737
Ulysses?

>>11301496
to be fair she's right, Thucydides is very dull compared to Herodotus

>>11305602
It's basically a tribute to Ulysses written by pic. He's not seen on /lit/ very much so it's probably hard unless you reverse image search

>>11298718
I would commit a shooting just to use all my ammo on this guy

>>11299512
>the cast of 400 characters, one of whom is a lightbulb
Wtf I love Pynchon now

>>11301359
Fucking newfag go

>>11301799
The illusion of free will is the shackles your masters foist upon you

>>11305681
There is nothing in Herodotus that even compares to the Sicilian expedition.

>>11305844
brainlet take

>>11298662
Gatsby

>>11299512
>>11299512

She reads only 8 pages per day. Disgusting.

>>11299531
>Don Quixote
>sexist

wtf? I can't think of a single example of that in the entire thing. There was even that scene where the woman tells off a crowd of men that she has no obligation to reciprocate any man's advances or to love anyone at all, and that they should all basically go fuck themselves. And they respect her wishes. DQ was one of the most fun novels I've ever read so it boggles my mind when people call it boring, too

>>11298662
Who is Iti and why does Omar hate him so much?

>If God had asked me to sacrifice my only son I would have told him to go fuck himself

So the divine heavenly father appears before you and commands you to do his bidding yet you would tell him to "go fuck himself" because you're an atheist despite the fact that god just proved himself to you?

Dead giveaway, but it's so funny to me. I don't even know how he was able to read it, let alone write.

>>11306237
Book of the New Sun?

>>11306309
THAT'S a clunker?

>>11299072
KUYASHI

>>11306330
Prince of Nothing.

>>11306309
>First off, he isn't really invisible

l m a o

This is actually pretty fun

>>11307705
Death in Venice

>>11299513
I hope that sandnigga is okay. He'll get stoned to death if the Muslims figure out he's a Stirner fanboy.

>>11298652
I love how people who believe in absolute and unchanging values like the laws of nature often can't help but shriek about how they don't believe in God. They are the same thing. What a huge contridiction and lack of awareness.

>>11307881
Are you saying "God is the universe?" Because that's dumb and doesn't mean anything. When I say I don't believe in God I mean I don't believe in a personal God, like the Abrahamic religions worship.

>>11308413
Les Miserable, of course.

>>11308413
Les Misérables.

>>11306198
they grasp at straws. I recently read The Pilgrim's Progress and some bitch had annotated all over it pointing out the "sexism"

>>11308736
>terrible story
but was it good? or did it just make her feel terrible?

>>11308739
I'm not sure. But it seems that they are closely related for her.

>>11308758
>not a pleasant feeling
what a pleb
I love waking up and being so out of it I can't tell my dick from the alarm clock.

>>11308672
>are you saying "God is the universe"
No, im saying God represents a set of absolute value(s) which are unchanging. Very similar if not exactly like the "laws" of physics, though the only difference is you don't call them the letters G, O, and D in that sequence. By God of the Abrahamic religions I assumed you mean a creative God who created the universe using his design and rules. If we take the "laws" of the natural world and make the most convenient (and miraculous) assumption that they created themselves (big bang/ basic materialist teleology), then they are functionally the same as even the Abrahamic caricature of God only differing in name. For this reason, believing in "natural law" and turning your nose up to the concept of God is a contridiction.

If we want to overcome this contridiction, we must recognize that, metaphysically, this reality is ever-changing in ways that will and have defied our current "laws" of nature. What is commonly referred to as absolute "laws" and "constants" are simply habits of a reality we experience in tiny fragments of its whole existence. The speed of light is not a constant, along with many other assumed constants, but acknowledging this would turn the scientific orthodoxy on its head, so there are pragmatic reasons we make these (wrong) assumptions, though you still shouldn't ever believe in them as absolute truths defining reality.

>>11308758
Alice in Wonderland

>>11308822
You're right.

>>11308736
I'm really curious what this one is.

>>11308784
This sounds like a lot of sophistry and semantics. Why would you call the laws of physics God? What the fuck is the point? Just call them what they are, don't try and tack on God.

>>11308896
>just call them what they are
When you say the name of something, you aren't calling them what they are, you just assign them that name, it's irrelivent to what they actually are as experienced by us. This is something basic I know you already know, and it isn't the main point. The point is, these two particular concepts, God and the "laws" of nature are functionally the same thing, a representation of a set of absolute values from which these reality is ordered by. For this reason, believing in the "laws" of nature and denouncing God at the same time is contradictory. I'm not "tacking on God", you (an assumed follower of natural law) are the one who is guilty of that.

The only silver lining I can see between the two is ethics, though many nu-atheists seem to be having a fun time developing many oughts from an is in a sort of counter-ethics argument against those of God-based religions. Basically my gripe is with people especially the scientific orthodoxy worshiping (assumed) absolute truths while taking the high ground above religious persons doing the same thing. I outlined a solution to this in the second half my previous post.

>>11301737
>du rigour

>>11308736
death of ivan ilyich
or
as i lay dying

>>11302503
If a man can only choose what he believes to be most advantageous or sensical, why don't you donate your body? When you consider it your own selfishness is the only thing that prevents you, and that is something you could easily get rid of with enough time. There is no way whatever you achieve in this life will be more directly beneficial to more people than you giving up every single one of your useful organs at the cost of nothing more than you speeding up the inevitable. Come on now, it really is just the logical conclusion of your life.

>>11298781
Why am I laughing at this stupid post damn it

>>11307705
>arab
should be right up their alley

>>11298774
art of the deal

An easy one

>>11298774

>>11308413
>that person that writes reviews for books they didn’t finish

>>11310415
Dostoevsky?

>>11309129
based

>>11309913
the ballpoint pen conspiracy is easily one of the most retarded I've ever seen and it is so prevalent
I'm sometimes fascinated by the disorderedness of the stormfags mind

>>11310477
I know, and it isn't even necessary as it is widely know there are at least 3 different versions of the diary all edited and approved by the father except the now impossible to get, unedited version where she talks about hating her mother and having sexual thoughts about boys.

>>11306198
>How is Don Quixote sexist.
It should be person Quixote, obviously.

>>11301799
The problem with this is not that it isn't true, but that it's an escape. A way to skirt responsibility.

>>11310419

>>11310505
i believe that serial murderers are at fault for either not realising the error of their ways, or for actively ignoring or relishing it. they are in control of whether they kill or seek other outlets for their frustrations and desires.

>>11310470
Based

>>11299110
That feel when she gives away the ending in a review...

>>11309014
Ivan Ilyich. You´re correct.

>>11310424
>If you don't eat the whole thing, then how do you know that it tastes bad?
don't be retarded

>>11298652
The Brothers Karamazov?

>>11298697

Something by Nietzsche?

>>11310840
Candide

>>11311047
Finnegan's wake?

>>11311047
da jesus book?

God damn, wish I had seen this post earlier cause I have been wanting to share this horrendous review for a long ass time.

https://www.goodreads . CUM /review/show.html?book_show_action=false&from_review_page=1&id=1814633475&page=2

>>11311471
>bookshelves: slutshaming, slut-shaming
lol

>>11311471
>I should have tried to convince my professor to change this assigment. I should've told him that this kind of topics are potential PTSD triggers for me (which is 100% true, although usually books don't activate triggers for me, certain kind of music and smells are triggering for me) or that they are against my religious beliefs (that'd been a lie, but I wish I had lied)

This is gold

>>11311471
Shelved as: unsafe-read

>>11311471
If Im reading the wiki history page correctly, someone edited this today

This one just... the weeb is too strong.

Book is: Across the Nightingale Floor by Lian Hearn. Its Fiction. Its alright. Nothing special. But lots of the stuff mentioned happens once or twice. Earthquakes happen once or twice in the book. That is it, for example.

>>11311471
>#40 most followed
>#15 best reviewers
Goodreads.

>>11311471
what in the everloving fuck is a demi-feminist?

>>11311538
My English teacher would often just make us read in silence while he marked things and that book was one of the ones I usually went for when someone grabbed the Ben Elton book before I did. I don't understand how anyone can hate that book enough to write that review. Fucking weebs

>>11311471
I wish this was a troll

>>11298985
>lay people think hipster grad students
lol at referring to non hipster civilians as lay people compared to the esteemed profession of being a student

>>11301737
>du rigour
lmao idk what this is but i bet the characters only said something basic like voila or je ne sais quoi a few times and she chimped out

>>11302225
Was about to say the same thing. A friend of mine is writing her dissertation on proto-feminist figures in lit from that era, and Cervantes writes them into almost all of his work.

There's an argument to be made that certain characters, and the society the novel is set in, are sexist, but to call the novel itself sexist is silly.

>>11311749
do feminist girls nowadays actually believe men and women are the same? as in do they truly believe that or is it just a thing they say for political purposes

>>11298764
rude desu

>>11298985
Simulation and Simulacra?

>>11311758
For most of them it's the latter. If you talk to them in real life and say that you think women shouldn't be conscripted in war they will either agree or get confused, angry and then later agree with you.

>>11311758
>>11311784
No, that's a strawman. Many feminists (especially in the "second wave") center their research entirely around the womb, and think that oppression is caused by society trying to impose chastity and/or motherhood on women. Others believe that the concept of womanhood doesn't even make sense, and should be done away with. Still more don't think much about the causes of oppression, and just argue that women and men deserve equal treatment (something which research shows they don't get — given two identical resumés, one with a male name and one with a female name, employers are more likely to call in the man for an interview).

The "men and women are the same" meme is tumblrettes misunderstanding feminism and youtube """skeptics""" debunking this garbled misreading of feminist texts.

>>11311739
It's Will Self's 'Umbrella'. There's hardly anything at all in it that isn't English.

>>11302379
>he believes in causation
You need to read some of this big boi.

>>11298764
the average poster here who actually does read reads at a rate of 20-30 pages an hour. if he has a job and only a few hours to spare each night he'd finish it in 2-3 days. not a big deal

>>11311821
>if he has a job

>>11311788
It's not a strawman when the
>tumblrettes misunderstanding feminism
are who I'm criticizing. For them feminism really is about nothing more than power.

>>11311831
i was talking about the guy who made the review not the average Based NEET who posts here

>>11311835
>For them feminism really is about nothing more than power
How did this man manage to ruin western civilization?

>>11311846
I would read his works but the good people of goodreads have spoken

>>11306309
Its Invisible Man by Ralph Elison

>>11311471
>several Tumblr GIFs in review
oh boy, here we go agai

>>11311706
Barring SJW shit (the extent of which is honestly overestimated), grad students are undoubtedly smarter, or at least more knowledgeable, than the average civilian.
>>11311781
Nope.

>>11299531
People cannot appreciate or enjoy relics from a bygone time because they don't mesh with their 20 year old modern values.
Baffling.

>>11311876
Being and Nothingness?

>>11312743
>Followed the links
Oh I see

>>11298700
>it's not a detective story if you know the murderer from the beginning
>mfw

>>11311788
Based anon

>>11311835
>For them feminism really is about nothing more than power.
I think this is a mischaracterization. It's true that power dynamics are a part of the tumblr crowd's critique of gender, but I wouldn't say that they're just trying to seize power. To me, it looks more like they're using hyperbole. "Ask for more than what you want" is a pretty common tactic in negotiations, so the discussion they're interested is probably something like:
>Alt-right: Hey, I want a white ethnostate.
>Tumblr: Well, we want a BLACK ethnostate, so there.
>Rational™ YouTube™ Skeptics™: Both of these ideas seem bad, and the common idea is an ethnostate, so ethnostates must be bad.
>The conversation continues and the concept of an ethnostate is abandoned.
This usually isn't how things go — the Rational™ Skeptics™ tend to paint the speakers rather than the ideas than negative, which is a lazy intellectual practice —but I somehow doubt that tens of thousands of kids on the internet are unironically advocating for a witch-led matriarchy with a 10% male population.

>>11313246
120 Days of Sodom?

>>11311876
Notes?

>>11311876
The communist manifesto?

>>11298652
I remember when I picked up Old man and the Sea some Anon said it was a book no woman would ever understand. Sat down and read it in like 5 hours, completely entranced by the beauty of the struggle.

this is the second most liked review on goodreads.

>>11313377
>how can I possibly make this book about my vagina
Adam really fucked up he should have just been happy with what God have him to begin with

>>11313377

>>11313513
the whole problem was that he was a picky bitch to begin with.

>>11312743
>>11313328
>>11313343
Foucalt's Madness and Civilization

>>11314336

>>11298946
Result of living apart from god.

>>11311129
>>11311459
Far Tortuga by Peter Matthiessen. Beautiful impressionist novel.

>>11314336
Mein Kampf?

>>11314336

>>11314363
Why would I want to live with God though? He seems like a dick.

>>11314381
What the fuck? Uh, let's see. 12 Rules?

>>11299512
>These things were probably shocking in 1973, but now just seem tedious and crass.

How far things have fallen.

>>11314697
not 12 rules
Leviathan

>>11310415
>we live in a society

>>11299510
Ah, this ones a classic. I Have No Mouth and I must Scream.

>>11308736
Lincoln in the Bardo?

>>11314381
>flash him my tits and then slap him in the face and call him a pervert
Where can I find this girl?

>>11314365
What does copm mean

>>11314940
captain

>>11314912
>2012

nvm im retarded

>>11299110
Is this Emily May? That women is mad.

Why is Aryan beauty s

>>11315774
*so triggering? Ressentiment of uggos and 3rd worlders?

>>11299615
>I'm awfully glad I didn't read it, it was terrible.

>>11314336

>>11299615
Goodreads allows you to write reviews before a book is even released, part of the reason that HRC's book is so highly rated. Well, that and a coordinated deletion of the majority of negative reviews. Goodreads is trash.

>>11307705
loliiiiiita

>>11316161
you go the author right

>>11298652
>MFW

>>11311758
Unfortunately my gf started going to college and is now heading down the tumblr sjw drain. We had an argument recently because she said that men and women are physically identical in every way except for the genitals. This was apparently taught to her in a sociology class.
I cry myself to sleep at night knowing that I’ll probably have to cut this formerly wonderful girl loose fairly soon.

>>11316235
HRC?

>>11316940
If she is that naive you should cut her loose.

>>11298662
The stranger

>>11316940
>We had an argument recently because she said that men and women are physically identical in every way except for the genitals. This was apparently taught to her in a sociology class.
is this actually a thing they are teaching now lmao? it sounds like parody

>>11298718
That review is bait, right? Right?
It would be like complaning about Milton's or Shakespeare's old english. Sure, when Faulkner lived, people spoke with the same form of language that is used today, but he wanted to portray specific times in which specific form of language was spokeno.

>>11310415
Something by Lewis?

>>11317036
Hillary

The Complete Stories of Flannery Oconnor

>>11298652
lol

>>11318167
I noticed she said the book used the N word "too much." Does that mean there is an acceptable amount of niggers that can be used in a book? What is that number?

>>11316235
>a coordinated deletion of the majority of negative reviews
I think I need more info to decide whether I approve of this or not. Were they just normal, reasonable negative reviews? Or was it /pol/tards screeching about da joos and niggers?

>>11319502
It wasn't even on goodreads. It was on Amazon, for one. And it was /pol/tards.

>>11311471
Jesus christ I fucking started to stroke out reading this review.

>>11315774
>I'm not attracted to the authors idea of the perfect lover so the book is bad

Christ.

>>11314381
>If I met ____ in the street I would flash him my tits and then slap him in the face and call him a pervert.

Lmfao

>>11319497
12,000

>>11298662

https://youtu.be/-fboNlM5hL4

>>11298697
My diary desu

>>11320044
what the fuck

>>11298985
12 Rules for Life. The book has some good ideas but is incredibly verbose and could have easily been shortened from 400 pages to 150.

>>11298718
fuckin kek

>>11299110
Is this Emily Wilson the famed translator?

Why are all these reviews written by women?