/lit/ - Literature

>>11189126
Nigga aint even the next Yung Lean

He is the next tai lopez

>>11189126
the next pewdiepie

>>11189126
Yes

He is the only prominent thinker at the moment who is seriously tackling the issue of being-in-the-world

>>11189126
If those guys lived in modern times, would they be regarded as hacks just like any other modern philosopher?
They would be more exposed through social media and all their speeches available on video, people would be able to scrutinize them more and the genius would tumble down.I wonder.

Niggas the next ayn rand, appeals to disenfranchised incels and basement dwellers with superiority complexes

>>11189208
> posting on anonymous literature image board
> not having some sort of superiority complex
choose one

>>11189206
Why are you comparing men that revolutionized their fields to Peterson?

He's just another ordinary broke nigga with a murder record

>>11189126
Peterson has written maybe one good book which was basically Campbell, Jung and folk psychology.

>>11189126
hes just a fat cat filling up his wallet laughing his way to the wolf on wallstreet

>>11189126
No but he is the next Cosby, Stills, Nash and Young.

>>11189126
i'm takin this bait
kill yourself, nigger

Yes, he is the greatest living philosopher

>young men are struggling
>shooting up schools and joining extremist groups left and right
>Peterson is the only public intellectual worth a damn who bothers to speak to these young men on their own terms and convey a message that makes sense to them
>OY VEY HE'S AN EVIL ALTRIGHT NATZIE!

Genuinely compelled me to ratiocinate.

>>11189361
So is it bait or not? Why would you get angry if it was

>>11189126
HAHAHAHAHA

>>11189206
Yes, they would. In Nietzsche’s day he was hated like shit (bcs he criticized Christianity), his books didn’t sell either and if he would’ve lived in modern days the retards on this autistic boards would say

> HAHA LOOK AT DIS MUSTACHE GUY FKN HACK GUYS XDDD

I'm convinced Juden Peterstein is the dumb persons smart person.
Your average commoner in the early 20th century had a better education than this twit.
If you even have to ask that question OP then its clear you've never read those people, because if you had you would see what a mental infant Peterson is.

>>11189126
>Nietzsche, Freud, or Jung
at this point I'd put him on the same level as someone like Adler or Maslow but below someone like Chomsky

>>11189206
>>11189429
lord almighty.

>>11189126
Sure, why not? We already have 6 comic book movies a year and read Star Wars fan fiction in college classes. Let the whole world burn already.

>>11189396
>His solution to said disturbed young man is to just pretend everything is OK and act like the WASPest motherfucker in the cul de sac, even though these were exactly the people who raised said disturbed young men and fucked their world up left and right

huh this cannuck is going PLACES

>>11189452
nice rebuttal, retard
at least try to prove why they’re not wrong, writing 2 words and posting a pic is easy, now try to engage in a debate

>>11189488
How's this for a rebuttal; you are fundamentally incorrect.

>thinking anyone from the last ~200 years is even fundamentally correct about anything at all

Look how far we've fallen.

KNEEL BEFORE ME

>>11189396
>Peterson is the only public intellectual worth a damn
Juden Peterstein ain't worth shit.

>>11189396
>young men are struggling with their comfortable upper-middle class lifestyle
>shooting up schools(?) and joining extremist groups left and right
>Peterson straddles the fence and tells everyone it'll be ok if they just clean their room and act like a contrarian sophist

Peterson fans are the new Sargon fans
Psuedo-conservative centrist cowards who think they've solved the issue of modernity, when they're just repeating what people like Nietzche and Evola said in dumbed down English.

>>11189494
fucking retard

I'm not entirely convinced he's actually read Nietzsche. Also his mythopoetics are extremely bad.

>>11189511
not an argument

>>11189126
CHARLATAN

>>11189396
>imposing boomer values in young men is going to fix young men reacting to a world ruined by boomer values

really fires up those neurons

>>11189521
Ted was a true genius, Jordan is a antidepressant addict who is as postmodern as it gets, despite his rhetoric.

>>11189515
Of course he hasnt. He probably read Beyind Good & Evil once.
Just listen to his "history" lectures about WW2. To anyone well versed in that peroid of history its instantly apparent he's probably only read The Gulag Archipelago and some book about the Holocaust a decade ago and just regurgitates the same shit he read over and over again as proof of the evils of Fascism and Communism.

He's the meme master, he's even advocating for a moral free market based. A true meme machine.

>>11189546
>free market
>morals
Top kek!

>>11189521
Chad nw0 Ted vs Virgin nw4 with transplant Jeordan

no

he writes self-help books for lost teenagers

>>11189528
t. 23 year old boomer

>>11189505
Please don't die on us Ziz. Hang on through your diabetes, heart problems, prostate issues, face paralysis and kidney cancer, I don't want to live in a world where I can't regularily play videogames while I listen to your latest wise sniffs and so on and so on...

>>11189505
>Zizek was once the clown of all politics
>Now he is the only person who accurately criticizes both the left and the right
Jesus Christ I wish I hadn't lived this long...

>there are people that unironically believe we can go back to a modernist mode of being under late(st) capitalism

holy moly, try thinking dialectically for once in your lives please. everything contains the germ of its own undoing and modernism literally necessitated the creation of postmodernism. there's no going back.

>>11189586
No dude, believe me. Just vote conservative and we will all be back in the 1950's!!

>>11189529
you need only look at the fact that Ted has a full head of hair while Peterson is balding and pale. It reflects their physical and mental health.

Communists sure do hate him.

>>11189586
>dialectically
I'm sorry, I have a heterosexual brain, so I can't do that.
>>11189618
He's a cultural communist. Justifying belief in God not in and of itself but on basis of "Judeo-Christian" beliefs is as communist as you can get.

>>11189550
hairlines aren't nearly as important as your resolve.

>>11189618
I'm a communist and liked his mythological interpretations and some of his pop-psychology stuff.

I don't give a fuck about any of the post-conjecture related to Peterson because his brain begins after reality ends so there's literally nothing to talk about.

>>11189627
>I am an ideology
I know what you were getting at but this is fucking embarrasing.

>>11189637
>implying JP isn't ideology

>>11189637
I meant I vote for democratic socialists, you're right though, I don't identify completely with an ideology, like I am an object in service of the correct doctrine.

>>11189618
People that have actually read/studied history and philosophy hate him.

>>11189649
what

>>11189659
Read Simone Weil on ideologies.

"The broad masses of a nation are not made up of professors and diplomats. Since these masses have only a poor acquaintance with abstract ideas, their reactions lie more in the domain of the feelings, where the roots of their positive as well as their negative attitudes are implanted. They are susceptible only to a manifestation of strength which comes definitely either from the positive or negative side, but they are never susceptible to any half-hearted attitude that wavers between one pole and the other. The emotional grounds of their attitude furnish the reason for their extraordinary stability. It is always more difficult to fight successfully against Faith than against knowledge. Love is less subject to change than respect. Hatred is more lasting than mere aversion. And the driving force which has brought about the most tremendous revolutions on this earth has never been a body of scientific teaching which has gained power over the masses, but always a devotion which has inspired them, and often a kind of hysteria which has urged them to action.
Whoever wishes to win over the masses must know the key that will open the door to their hearts. It is not objectivity, which is a feckless attitude, but a determined will, backed up by force, when necessary."
- an Austrian painter

>>11189656
fucking this

>>11189637
>i dont have an ideology
so you're a coward?

>>11189665
no

>>11189683
I WILL NOT DO IT

words evoked of Jordan Peterson:
>pewdiepie
>youtube algorithms
>top 5 triggered feminists get rekt
>rhetoric
>pseudo-philosophy
>self-help
>neet-help
>marketing and money

>>11189677
hey
hey
this is imageboard

>>11189698
>a materialist trying to understand mythology and theology

>>11189126
A bit of all of them but original at the same time; Jordan Peterson stands alone in his examination of the epistemological diversion between that which is, that which has not yet been, that which has been and the grim outlook esoteric post-modernist philosophy insinuates through Marxist academic institutions. That which interests has no will, but that which has a will will not interest - this is the basic observation that is built upon (but not predicated upon that which is not certain) through rigorous debate.

>>11189405
cuz
>yung

>>11189734
Excellent pasta have your (You)

Stop following this intellectual snake oil salesman and read a real critique of the modern world

>>11189771
>dude magic lmao

There are real modern day great thinkers but peterson is not one of them.

>>11189133
underrated

There will never be a foucault-memerson debate.

>>11189777
Nigga what

>>11189656
People who are thinly concealing their asshurt sure do bring up a lot of vague claims about him.

>>11189783
memerson would get visibly angry and faux cry to show that hes trustworthy.

I find it funny how he rails against post-modernism and yet the two thinkers he (((((draws heavily from))))) are its big daddys

Has he actually read them?

>>11189665
winner winner chicken dinner

>>11189672
Unironically pretty smart, although diabolical

>>11189804
He has, but you will notice that he conveniently never tells his students to read them.

>>11189779
He is tho

do u think in his next book peterson will tell us to eat our vegetables? i do most "adult" things like usually keep my room relatively clean, but i tend to skimp on the veggies

>>11189126
No, he’s not quite on their level in my opinion, although he’s unironically not a bad continuation of their tradition for the modern day. I dislike when people say he hasn’t read them or understood them. He definitely has.

>>11189126
For me it's Peterson: intelligent, nihilistic, and with a wicked sense of humor.

>>11189804
But they aren't actually post modern and he's not obliged to follow them to the letter, so what's the issue?

>>11189825
>I dislike when people say he hasn’t read them or understood them. He definitely has.
LOL, maybe YOU should read some of those people and realize the truth.

I am probably the learned one on Peterson here and would say he is probably the most important person alive at the moment. Most people here take him out of context and scarecrow him but if you actually put in the time to learn more you would know he is legit.

>>11189839
what's it like to live in an echochamber/bubble and be semi-illiterate?

>>11189830
So you honestly think JP is doing an honest interpretation of those 3 intellectuals by picking and choosing and completely misinterpreting half of their works? Maybe you should start reading the texts yourself so that you realize exactly how much artistic freedom JP is taking with these thinkers.

>>11189834
lolololooll xD

>>11189771
This is a good book, but for the love of God do not try to read this book before you have read any Rene Guenon. Read up to "Reign of Quantity and Signs of the Times" at a bare minimum, and this isn't even the best book to start with Evola.

Seriously. You won't understand what in the fuck he is talking about without understanding the basis of Traditionalism.

>>11189816
Might makes right, its not a new concept.
These intellectual LARPers like Peterson will achieve nothing by postulating.

"The great questions of the day will not be settled by means of speeches and majority decisions, but by iron and blood."
-Otto von Bismarck

>>11189849
>lol reading is dum xD. My new father figure does it for me!!

JBP is closer to—historically speaking—Siddhartha Gautama, Mohammed, or Christ himself.

>>11189804
Pseud opinion.

>>11189856
:)))))))

>>11189851
Ageed. Revolt is fucking hard to get into if you dont have an understanding of Traditionalism or Evola's ideas first.
If you can understand him its an incredible book.

This is probably the best entry point to Evola.

>>11189859
Pseud opinion

>>11189649
> democratic
> socialists
10/10 bait

>>11189126
No, he's a vehicle for Jung.

>>11189857
But—popmusically speaking—he is the unexpected Madonna of our generation (but not his generation) (I mean Madonna the Madonna, not Madonna the Madonna, as Madonna the Madonna is always with us even if you are not aware of it).

He's certainly very influential amongst young people and I personally find it refreshing. It's been a while since anyone within the public spotlight spoke to them in anything other than the language of Corporate Progressivism.

He's making classical liberalism popular amongst kids and stealing some thunder from marxist feminist dance theory. No harm in that.

>>11189877
>spreading liberalism
There's yer problem

>>11189884
Maybe yours.

>>11189877
>It's been a while since anyone within the public spotlight spoke to them in anything other than the language of Corporate Progressivism.
Ah yes his position is so fresh and free!
>Go to work. Take Anti-depressants. Get married. Have children.
So radical and new!

>>11189206
>They weren't as exposed to scrutiny maaaaaan
>Thousands of pages of material that has been scrutinized for over a century

Peterson is a charlatan. He has produced no original material of note. He is a clown worshiped by undereducated pseudo-intellectuals on YouTube. To add to that he is a corporate whore who lends his name to Monsanto and carries water for neocons and Zionists. He is a massive joke.

>>11189892
Fresh in the last 60 years. Certainly fresh in terms of its popularity among an increasingly hedonistic McDonalds-Marxist young population. I didn't say he was original.
Also, not accurate on the anti-depressant count.

>>11189902
>Hurrr families are a new idea in the last 60 years
JP openly promotes anti-depressants, in fact he takes them himself. Maybe you should actually look into your new messiah rather than worshipping him for being "different"

>>11189510
Peterson is a classic liberal who tries to reinforce the norms of the post-WWII global order. He is afraid of identity politics because it could rip apart liberal systems, not because it could usher in literal communism. He actually makes this quite clear.

Nietzsche shits on Peterson. Peterson worships Abrahamic myth and tries to argue for its real world application in psychology and politics. Dude is a low level mystic and snake oil salesman. Nietzsche had his faults, but actually attempted to confront the ideological crises of his time. Peterson is a cowardly fraud.

>>11189891
Its everyone's problem. Most just dont realise it yet.
Peterson is just another spiritual semite advocating modenist values and pretending its achieving anything.
Modernity is the issue, not "post-modernism" or "neo-marxists" or "radical ideology".
Apathy, tolerance, false sense of atonement, guilt, materialism, spiritual judaism and an excess of comfort. None of those he even touches on. Those subjects aren't "safe" and dont make him a paycheck.
The greatest thinkers were almost always unpopular in their time. Peterson is extremely popular, and he's turned his meaningless rhetoric into a multi-million dollar business.

>>11189922
double dubs of truth

>>11189929
Bang on.

Peterson can't even properly define Marxism. I'm confident that he doesn't even understand historical materialism. He accuses Marx of being "postmodern" on Twitter. Dude is a first rate clown.

>>11189922
>>11189929
+1

>>11189917
I didn't say his ideas were what I find fresh, but his popularity, and consequently the popularity of classical liberal values amongst young people, you illiterate imbecile.

As far as anti-depressants go, he has spoken against the fact that they are definitely over-prescribed, but annotated this by saying that there are instances in which they do actually work both in terms of symptom management/coping and as an actual remedy.

>>11189922
>Peterson is a classic liberal who tries to reinforce the norms of the post-WWII global order

Post-WWII wasn't liberal it was peak activist Keynesianism... read Engels "The Condition of the Working Class in England" for what "classical liberal" norms looked like in practice

>>11189929
I disagree. I also disagree with the epithets you used to describe classical liberalism with. You're just preaching to your choir.

Again, he's your problem, not mine. And you better address it with a strategy different from the one you just adopted here.

>>11189937
I'm a political fascist and it even annoys me how many people misuse the words "Marxism" and "socialism". Almost as abused as the word "fascist".
Conservatives think welfare and pink haired feminism is Marxism. Lmao

>>11189830
He doesn't follow them at all, that's the issue

>>11189126
the next dj khaled

>>11189929
>dude let's pretend nukes don't exist and the Earth isn't home to 7 billion humans DUDE read Neetchee and then and then and then and then and then and then and then and then and then and then and then and then and then and then and then and then and then and then and then and then and then

Can /lit/ tell me why he's so wrong exactly?

>>11189944
So the popularity of families is something that only arrived within the last 60 years? LOL HURRRR

>As far as anti-depressants go, he has spoken against the fact that they are definitely over-prescribed
Yet he continues to take them and promotes them blindly without actually applying specific criticism? HE'S A GENIUS LOL

>>11189979
Just read his works, it should be obvious. You DO read don't you?

>>11189979
Its not that he's wrong. Its the fact that what he says is just basic knowledge to anyone with an above average education.
Its cringeworthy reading or listening to Peterson after reading people like Nietzsche.

>>11189984
If I have time to read I wouldnt come to /lit/

>>11189979
No they can't.

>>11189956
Did I say the post-WWII order was classically liberal? Apologies if that was the perception. Peterson is a wonky liberal, that is my point. He also reinforces the status quo rather than challenges it.

>>11189962
Cons and Libs in North America are illiterate in this regard. For them "communism", "fascism", "Nazism" etc. are useful to lob at their opponents. Then the average moron turns around whines that "nothing changes" as the same cycle of political whoring churns on in his precious liberal democracy.

>>11189976
>and then you fight the dragon and clean your room and thats, just, how, it, is. Bucko.

>>11189979
he thinks that political correctness = stalinism
Not that I entirely disagree. actually my disdain for leftists had reached levels so high that I'm inclined to agree with him, and I say this as a leftist.

>>11189980
>So the popularity of families is something that only arrived within the last 60 years? LOL HURRRR

The popularity of the dedicated monogamous couple as the ideal unit in which to perform child rearing has been decreasing amongst young people in the last 60 years. This is well documented both as an attitude and observed by a decrease in marriage.
Same with other classical liberal values that people now think of as conservative.

So yes, it is refreshing to see these ideas becoming popular amongst young people and breaking the statistical trend that has been constant over the past six decades.

>Yet he continues to take them and promotes them blindly without actually applying specific criticism? HE'S A GENIUS LOL
I've already said that he 'applies criticism' by condemning over-prescription. The fact that he thinks they work in some circumstances, one of which being his own personal case, does not make him an industry plant.

I didn't say he was a genius either.

Are you clinically retarded mate?

>>11189979
This is actually a pretty good breakdown of how bankrupt Peterson is from an intellectual and ideological standpoint.

https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/03/the-intellectual-we-deserve

He criticizes "Marxism" but he doesn't understand what it is. His "original" work is warmed over Jung. He's a corporate whore and a neocon posing as anti-establishment.

He claims he's "helping" people while bringing in six figures on Patreon in addition to his tenured salary and the profits from his book sales.

cLeAn YoUr RoOmS, mAn!

>>11189929

>>11190012
>The popularity of the dedicated monogamous couple as the ideal unit in which to perform child rearing has been decreasing amongst young people in the last 60 years
But there is no evidence that "these ideas becoming popular amongst young people and breaking the statistical trend that has been constant over the past six decades" That is just something you tell yourself so you can sleep at night.

>I've already said that he 'applies criticism' by condemning over-prescription.
Sure, just like "it's bad to kill people" is a criticism of school shooters that also has absolutely no teeth.

>>11189830
He doesn't follow them at all

>>11189126
if you mean a hack who's ideas and concepts were discredited within only a decade after his death, then sure

>>11190038
The evidence is an acceleration of the breakdown of marriage in the past five years, more young women being opposed to the idea of having children, less people holding monogamy as a value. These trends have been stifled by what is colloquially referred to as the Z generation and by Peterson's traction with disenfranchised millennials. It became acceptable to be against "SJW's" because of the rise of people like Peterson promoting classical liberal values.

>Sure, just like "it's bad to kill people" is a criticism of school shooters that also has absolutely no teeth.
That's like your opinion mate. The fact that you think all anti-depressants are bad in any circumstance is not fact, nor does it make him an industry plant. Again, he has criticised over-prescription numerous times.

Why does he always sound like he's about to cry

>>11190002
>dude life can't possibly be banal I was DESTINED TO BE GREAT PLEASE TELL ME THERE IS AN ESCHATON AT THE END OF THIS I DON'T WANT TO BE LIKE EVERY other person please please please the ubermensch the love that moves the sun and the other stars please please something anything anything societal collapse and lovercraftian entities of genetic degradation please I beg of you please

>>11190067
Weird vocal register and because he often is on the verge of crying. But mainly weird vocal register.

>>11190062
>These trends have been stifled by what is colloquially referred to as the Z generation and by Peterson's traction with disenfranchised millennials.
lol this is truly the apex of narcissism, the weepy frogman's youtube diatribes are stifling global trends
and we're definitely winning bucko! gen z!

>>11190062
>more young women being opposed to the idea of having children, less people holding monogamy as a value. These trends have been stifled by what is colloquially referred to as the Z generation and by Peterson's traction with disenfranchised millennials
"colloquially" yes, but in ACTUALITY? No. Every single First World Country suffers the exact same problem, but it's easier to blame "postmodern cultural marxists" than the reality of the situation.

>he has criticised over-prescription numerous times
Yes because he is a person who prescribes them. I am not saying he is an "industry plant", but he sure as shit is not an unbiased individual.

>>11190070
>please please something anything anything societal collapse and lovercraftian entities of genetic degradation please I beg of you please

Sounds pretty great.

>>11189126
*blocks your ideology*

>>11190086
>>11190087
A deceleration in the spread of those SJW attitudes has been recorded in the last decade. I'm not saying Peterson is responsible for it. I'm saying Peterson along with other youtube personalities or whatever you'd like to call them fill a space that was previously unoccupied by contemporary 'pop thinkers'. So yes, his popularity is a new thing.

>than the reality of the situation.
I don't care what your opinion on this is. My sole statement was that his popularity is refreshing because he represents values that were recently unpopular with young people.
>but he sure as shit is not an unbiased individual.
So you disagree with all use of anti-depressants and the fact that he does not condemn that to the same degree as you adds to your criticism of him. That's cool mate. Start a blog.

>>11190115
Recently unpopular?

>>11190115
>A deceleration in the spread of those SJW attitudes has been recorded in the last decade.
by what recording instruments exactly lol

>>11190130
Probably Peterson's bank account lol

>>11189834
LOLOLOLOL I have, dumbass. XD

>>11190130
https://www.marketingweek.com/2016/09/14/behaviour-versus-demographics-why-the-term-millennial-is-useless/#.V9kYPw2SASg.twitter

https://contemporaryfamilies.org/2-pepin-cotter-traditionalism/

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dap.30174/full

https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUH-FFR1-2016/NSDUH-FFR1-2016.htm#illicit2

>>11190126
Yes. Or at least not occupied in the space of pop thinkers. The only pop thinkers that appealed to younger generations were 'progressive' SJWs and Chomsky types at best.

>>11190115
>All of these "unbiased studies" on a google doc ready to repost
LOL I wonder who is behind this post

>>11190166
>YOU SEE, THESE COMPLETELY UNRELATED STUDIES PROVE MY POINT
Ah yes, "gen Z" polls starting in 2014 are so accurate and clearly representative of the times.

>>11190028
>I can't understand this this thing that has pretty apparent meaning.
>he's too verbose
thank you for making me read all of this.

>>11189830
Nigger he actually tells people Nietzsche was LAMENTING ON THE DEATH OF GOD and try to somehow use Nietzsche to create pragmatic christian morals, which are 3 of the least nietzschean words ever. You should stop trying to defend this man and go actually read the authors he mentions (save maybe Jung, that's shit)

>>11190174
do what you will with them. I posted them for consultation, as per your request. Unlike the actual /leftypol/ subversion raids, there are no milquetoast classical liberal militias shilling their ideology on here. But think what you will of it. Being civil to you people is tiring.

Tell me about Peterson! Why dies he wear the mask?

>>11190181
How are they unrelated? We were discussing young people's socio-political attitudes weren't we?

>>11190191
>Hey man I'm doing YOU a favor by constantly shilling this board with my new ideologue father figure.
Kill yourself

>>11190197
Unrelated in the sense that they are a hodge-podge of whatever studies you could find that sort of agree with whatever point you thought you made.

>>11190183
If you think Maps of Meaning is a legitimate work then I have nothing more for you. You are beneath me and deserve death.

>>11190199
I have never in my life started a Peterson thread. Or any pop thinker thread for that matter. His triggering of /leftypol/ and the branch of /lit/ that habitually engages in pop politics amuses me, I have to admit.

>>11190199
If you can't tell this OP and nearly every OP before it is irony laced and anti Peterson then i don't even know what to tell you.

>>11190205
Rght. Conjure up a "hodge-podge" of studies that state otherwise.

>go read ____, no matter how much you think you know about humanity, it WILL disturb you
Why does he keep saying this? Not all people are fragile lambs

>>11190214
>>11190217
>>11190218
>3 "unrelated" JP posters "can't understand" why they are the worst shitposters on this board
HMMMMM, I WONDER WHY

>>11190228
>the /pol/fag defense.

>>11190226
I read Mein Kampf and it opened my eyes to National Socialism
Thanks Jordo!

>>11190228
Why are you so angry? Why is Peterson make you so angry?

Peterson is the dad I never had.

>>11190237
Peterson doesn't make me angry, underage posters do

>>11190248
Oh, You mean to say anyone who disagrees with you on Peterson is underage. But I'm not underage. What now?

>>11190256
>You mean to say anyone who disagrees with you on Peterson is underage
I never said that, can you read?

>>11189681
Is this bait?
My ideology can just as easily be nothing but my gut.

>>11190267
Yes. You must assume posters you engaged with are underage since you're angry. The only posters you engaged with disagreed with you on Peterson.

>>11190277
So yes you're a coward

>>11190285
>The only posters you engaged with disagreed with you on Peterson.
Now you are projecting, but let me just point out to you that this IS a JP thread, so everyone who is responding to anyone is "only posters you engaged with disagreed with you on Peterson"

>>11190293
precisely. So you must assume they are underage since you're angry and only underage people make you angry.

does anyone think peterson is genuine and not just a neoliberal shill?

>>11190298
Nice projecting, you really got me

>>11190299
Yes, me.

>>11190299
He was at one point, now he is raking in the money like he's working for the Clinton Foundation.