/lit/ - Literature

>>11039821
You gotta' deconstruct that shit by merging binary opposites, yo! Thus, you nullify the act of interpretation by taking the perspective of both the opposing parties, turning that dualistic yin and yang into an empty and void enso circle, bro.

>>11039836
>merging binary opposites
>not reversing the metaphysics of presence

>>11039845
That's why you use the dialectic. Even if you unify something, the opposite of that unity will always be duality. Thus, you use the trinity to create a fourth concept, which is one with all three terms. Still, this really is only used in extreme examples (i.e., those where unity and duality perspectives as a whole conflict).

>>11039861
>use the dialectic

>>11039821
>>11039836
>>11039845
>>11039861
>>11039868
why do you fucking retards waste so much time on talking about things that you know nothing about?

>>11039821
Tell that to /sci/, not us.

>>11039870
Why do you waste so much time assuming phoney didactic poses?

>MFW I put my ankles behind my head a wack it onto my own face

>>11039861
Duality is the unification of a contradictory pair, thus why it's a "pair" and hence why it's even demarcated as one word, "duality." The trinity consists of the two opposites and the pair of opposites together as one. From a arithmetic perspective: 1 + -1 = 0 (neutral set) and 1 + -1 + 0 (neutral set) = 0 (another larger neutral set).

>>11040158
Thats not trinity.

Whats inbetween dharma and karma :)???

>>11040179
Karma is simply the currency of Dharma, so to speak. As time goes by karma is shifted between each of us based on how we treat one another or we can receive karma from Dharma directly, e.i. a relationship with cosmos. Good Karma + Bad Karma = Dharma thus GK + BK + Dharma = Infinite Cosmos (aka God). The trinity is one as God.

>>11040448
interesting

>>11040448
Nope, wrong. There is no 'bad', there is no 'good'. There is flow (dharma), and action (karma).

My question is what is between

>>11040455
There's no 'good' or 'bad' in the sense that we can definite them exactly because that would require us to be the cosmos as a whole. I was taking Dharma as the first basic principle allowing the action (karma) to flow to begin with. Dharma (flow) IS Karma (action) because flowing is an action, whether that action be manifested through us or the environment.

>>11040466
Yes, but 'GK'+'BK' doesn't exist, since it's order is non-sequential.
Dharma is constant, Karma is the instant.
The only thing betweem them is 'nothing' quite literally, in all the sense of the word.

>>11040474
>Karma is the instant
>instant karma
are you memeing?

What is in between Dharma and Karma is the laws of nature that Dharma instill in the cosmos (aka Dharma again). Future and past karma is still karma even though it's not instantly there. How are you perceiving what is and isn't constant except through karma which dharma brought into existence which remains so is therefore karma as well. Karma is like the son of Dharma, but their still family.

Read Plato.

>>11039821
too bad

>>11039870
o_O

>>11040509
dude, Plato has nothing to do with RTA.
End your self.

You know nothing about eastern philosophy