[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 84 KB, 800x800, 154345432.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10998982 No.10998982[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>Yeah, I know 4 languages
>English, Spanish, Italian, and Portuguese

>> No.10998991

>>10998982
Tbqh it's impressive if a person can differentiate between Italian, Spanish, and Portuguese easily.

>> No.10998994

>yeah I know 4 languages
>English, Basque, Corsican, Romansch

>> No.10998997
File: 99 KB, 657x519, 1509139562183.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10998997

>>10998982
AAAAAAAAAAARGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGAAAAAAA
BRAAAAAAAAIIIIIINNNNNNNNNSSSSSS

>> No.10999001

>Yeah, I know 4 languages
>Python, Ruby, Lua, and PHP

>> No.10999015

>>10998982
Same + french instead of my english which is weak af

>tfw I'll never learn nothing besides romance languages
>tfw no Georg Trakl gf

>> No.10999019

>>10998982
I know english, latin, spanish, japanese, arabic, russian, french, german, swedish

>> No.10999022

>>10999015
>never learn nothing
We don't do this in English. I understand your confusion since it's done in Spanish, but in English it's called a "double negative" and is wrong. The proper way to say this is "never learn anything" or "learn nothing".

>> No.10999029

Tfw monolinglet

>> No.10999033

>>10999022
We don't do this on 4chan. I understand your confusion since it's done on Reddit0, but on 4chan it's called a "grammar nazi" and is wrong. The proper way to say this is "ain't never leanin' nothing" or "learn nuttin'".

>> No.10999036

>>10999022
thanks

>> No.10999038

>>10999033
When I was learning Spanish, I would have liked someone to point out my errors. I wouldn't have bothered correcting his grammar if he didn't say his English sucked, which I assume means he would like to improve it.

>> No.10999043

>>10999033
We dont do this on /lit/. I understand your confusion since it's done on /b/, but on /lit/ it's called "being a pseud" and is wrong. The proper way to say this is "I know that I know nothing" or "lern nut".

>> No.10999055

>>10999022
>and is wrong.
No it ain't. It's informal, but not wrong

>> No.10999064

>>10999038
>I would have liked someone to point out my errors.

it's not an error. you're confusing style with correctness.

>> No.10999069

>>10999055
We don't do this in the civilized English-speaking areas. I understand your confusion since it's done in your backwoods, inbred town, but in intelligent areas, you would be laughed at and scorned.

>> No.10999071

> Yea I know 4 languages
> 4
> Languages

Americans BTFO’D

> Hur dur the whole world speaks English

That’s ‘cause of Britain, faggots

>> No.10999075

>>10999055
"Enlightened" English speakers' explanations of grammar tend to be the least useful thing ever because they'll always tell you that English has no grammar to begin with so there is no such thing as being incorrect about grammar, even though they all speak the language in a way that essentially follows it unfalteringly.

>> No.10999077

>>10999069
But still not wrong.

>> No.10999082
File: 217 KB, 1066x600, C9288F4D-027B-4725-9191-0AEC62A19A65.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10999082

>>10998991

>> No.10999083

>>10999077
Go pick up an English textbook you fucking inbred. It's incorrect.

>> No.10999084

>>10999075
If a double negative is good enough for Chaucer then it's good enough for me.

>> No.10999089

>>10999083
Next you'll be spouting the old bullshit about how we shouldn't split infinitives or end a sentence with a preposition

>> No.10999092

>>10998991
Absolute state of /lit/

>> No.10999094

>>10999084
Chaucer's variety of English is deprecated.

>> No.10999096

>>10999089
You shouldn't, Cleetus. I bet you also don't use whom.

>> No.10999102

>>10999083
>the history of the masterworks of the english language is full of double negatives but i'm going to ignore it and trust a degenerate modern textbook instead

>> No.10999103
File: 159 KB, 999x1300, 2803677128.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10999103

>>10999083
PRESCRIPTIVISTS OUT OUT OUT

>> No.10999104

>>10999089
As an ESL I find these rules fantastically easy to follow, because I hold no particular attachment to a certain way of constructing my sentences. It's the ill-educated natives who are stubborn and inflexible.

>> No.10999106

>>10999096
But distinguishing between who and whom is grammatically correct, and isn't the result of 18th century writers thinking that English should have to follow the same rules as Latin for some nonsensical reason.

>> No.10999111

>>10999106
They aimed to create a unified, high register of the English language for the educated elite. They succeeded.

>> No.10999138

>>10999022
I speak fluent english and use double negatives all the time so people know my socioeconomic level.

>> No.10999140

>>10999071
>That’s ‘cause of Britain, faggots
Based Bri'ish ladm8s.

>> No.10999148

>>10998991
Bait

>> No.10999153
File: 57 KB, 468x571, 1504059839728.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10999153

>I know German

>> No.10999160

>>10998982
I speaks both Malay and English, but I do most of my writing in Malay. I always feel inferior with my English. I still don't know how to master the language enough so that I am able to express my thought correctly in narrative fiction, because I love good, good prose, and so far I had no problem exploiting sentence and prose, to bend them front and backward in my native language.

Tarkovsky's films gave the impression to me that Russian is a beautiful language but so far as my language 101 goes French felt entirely easier to learn compare to Russian.

>> No.10999170
File: 1.40 MB, 4602x3852, 1517538090449.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10999170

>Yeah, I only read four authors
>Joyce, DFW, Pynchon, and Peterson

>> No.10999171

>>10998982
>Yeah, i know 2 languages
>English (Britain), English (American)

>> No.10999178

>>10999171
>English and Scots

>> No.10999180

>>10999171
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VEs7y3sRG4

>> No.10999187

>>10998982
>Only knowing English and Afrikaans
End me /lit/

>> No.10999200

>>10999160
Russian here.
I tend to ignore all positive opinions on the Russian language from people who do not speak it because the amount of Westerners (Malays are even more distant in this case) with such claims, yet also any knowledge of the most basic Russian, remains close to zero. I'm not even talking about formal grammar (which is indispensable, by the way): they can't even put together simple words for a simple, two- or three-word sentence that would embody the natural Russian way of expression. Such people really know nothing, and their attempts to speak Russian are exceptionally ugly and awkward; what they therefore find beautiful, must have very little to do with the actual Russian language, it may even be what Russians consider ugly. Be careful!

>> No.10999217

Unironically what do other romance languages sound like if one of them is your first language?

>> No.10999235

>>10999187
Is Charlize Theron nice in real life?

>> No.10999243

>>10999180
i don´t get it

>> No.10999255

>>10999243
she's Australian, but I doubt it that Aussie speak any different than the Brits or their American counterpart.

>> No.10999262

>>10999235
How should I know?

>> No.10999273

>>10998982
Exactly me with the addition of Arabic. Keeps them guessing

>> No.10999292

>>10999217
I don't understand the question

>> No.10999313
File: 26 KB, 306x306, 1493869699143.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10999313

>Someone says they know another language
>they really just know the alphabet and how to write hello

>> No.10999315

>>10998991
It's pretty evident for non-brainlets.

>> No.10999318

>>10999217
Italian here.
Spanish: sounds like a retarded version of italian
Portoguese: sounds like drunken version of italian
French: sounds very nasal and effete
Romanian: sounds like a slav language

>> No.10999326

>>10999318
Spanish here.
Portuguese: sounds like a retarded version of Spanish.
Italian: sounds like a musical version of Spanish.
French: sounds like Spanish spoken by people with a sore throat.

>> No.10999332

Anyone else always find that spoken Hebrew sounds a lot like French?

>> No.10999337

>>10999217
Portuguese
Spanish: sounds like an easy version of portuguese;
Italian:sounds like an easy version of portuguese;
French:Sounds gay;
Romanian:Sounds okay. I like the dr sound

>> No.10999343

>>10999217
Portuguese is like Spanish spoken by a 5 year old Russian deaf kid (with aids).

>> No.10999345

>>10999337
French indeed sounds very gay.

>> No.10999347

>tfw speak English, German, Russian, and Japanese
>The single most useless spread of languages to have in the Southeastern US

>> No.10999352

>>10999345
From manliest to gayest:
1. Spanish
2. Portuguese
3. Italian
4. French

>> No.10999359

>>10999217
Probably starkly different. But also sounding like a weird version of your language.

>> No.10999361

>>10999345
>>10999352
All romance languages sound extremely effeminate.

>> No.10999376
File: 699 KB, 556x772, 1516381021441.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10999376

>Yeah, I know 4 languages
>English, vötgil, kay(f)bop(t), and toki pona

>> No.10999382

>>10999361
Some more than others.

Spanish is pretty straightforward, spoken like it's written, no flowery, no floriture. Raw, to the point. Manly.

Portuguese has many gay-looking words with ã or õ. As well as many French (aka gay) sounding tones. But still remains masculine.

Italian despite being spoken like it's written, it's too musical to be manly, it practically sounds like you're singing, also there are many funny words that sound very child-like.

French. It's as difficult to understand as a woman. Not spoken like it's written. Most things sound pretentious and flowery. Basically every rule has an exception and some rules are make the language "pretty", with no practical value. Very effeminate-sounding.

>> No.10999383

>>10999352
If we look at the distribution of homosexuals and faggotry in the countries in which those languages are spoken we would find that Portoguese and French are the most gay languages (with Portoguese being the most gay), with Spanish and Italian being having the same amout of gayness, more or less.

>> No.10999387
File: 232 KB, 1536x1080, 1494419360764.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10999387

>>10999153
>implying there is anything wrong with knowing german

>> No.10999388

>yeah I know 4 languages
>Serbian, Croatian, Bosnian, Montenegrin

>> No.10999394

>>10999383
I think French and Portuguese cultures lend themselves to homosexuality more than Spanish and Italian ones, which are more macho and masculine, but don't know why.

>> No.10999396

>>10999394
>more macho and masculine
HAAAAAAAHAAAAAAA

>> No.10999399

>>10999396
What?

>> No.10999403

at what level do you people actually know another language? I'm learning another and I can speak day to day conversations and read basic texts, but I wouldn't say I "know" it. I kind of doubt many people are actually fluent in some of the languages they list here.

>> No.10999405

>>10999396
The Italians hate fags, and macho the term itself comes from Spanish, that tella you everything. French adore fags, don't know about the Portuguese speakers, I though they were manly, but Brazil seems pretty exotic and flamboyant.

>> No.10999408

>>10999096
>using "you" instead of "thou"
Thou failest this tyme, Cleetus.

>> No.10999413

>>10999405
Brazil is the shemale capital of the world.

>> No.10999427

>>10999388
>and just enough English to say this

>> No.10999429

>>10999405
Italians standards for heterosexual behaviour and appearance are so fucking loose that there’s no such thing as a fag in Italy. You can be considered straight whilst kissing men and dressing like an absolute fag.

>> No.10999456

>>10998991
Italian and Spanish I understand, but Portuguese and Spanish is only a problem if you learn Portuguese first.

>> No.10999541

>>10999033
I like when people correct my English here desu

>> No.10999553

>>10999082
>>10999092
>>10999148
>>10999315
Understanding and learning them isn't the problem. But speaking all three of those languages without mixing up words is. Not sure why you all got so triggered. It makes perfect sense that you'd mix up a lot of words if you spoke all three since they're so similar.

>> No.10999567

>>10999553
>It makes perfect sense that you'd mix up a lot of words if you spoke all three since they're so similar.
no it fucking doesn't, the fact that they're similiar doesn't suddenly remove your ability to discern which is which

>> No.10999583
File: 196 KB, 602x469, main-qimg-47f06737111ffc2240844159bfcb8c45.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10999583

>>10999567
>ability to discern which is which
You can discern which is which. But when words are similar and with little difference, it's easy to mix them up.

>> No.10999610

>>10999001
kek

>> No.10999624

>>10999583
no you faggot, they look similiar on a superficial level but they don't "feel" similiar if you speak them, at least not enough for you to mix them up

>> No.10999625

>>10998982
> learning Portuguese

Ha!

>> No.10999627

>>10999153
>some of the most important philosophers were native speakers of German
>almost all of the best composers spoke German
>Einstein was a native German speaker

i mean you're probably a weeb though so who gives a shit. good luck learning japanese on that mountain dew and cheetos diet

>> No.10999648

>Yeah, I know 3 languages
>American English, British English, and Australian English

>> No.10999662

>>10999347
How old are you and how fluent are you in those languages

>> No.10999679

>>10999624
I know they sound different you brainlet. My point is that you can replace a word here and there if you're not careful. Mixing up stuff from those languages isn't rare. Nostro and nuestro is such a subtle difference that the speaker might not even notice they made a mistake. Same goes for nome and nombre. Speaking all three without making these small mistakes, in my opinion, is quite impressive.

>> No.10999682

>>10998982
Is that a wojack in the form of Tapir penis?

>> No.10999684

>>10999648
Bloody ripper m8

>> No.10999690

>>10999679
>Mixing up stuff from those languages isn't rare. Nostro and nuestro is such a subtle difference that the speaker might not even notice they made a mistake. Same goes for nome and nombre.
niggerfaggot, I speak both italian (native) and spanish and I'm telling that difference is only superficial. I said "feel" not "sound".
>>10999684
oi cunt

>> No.10999694

if you'd know english sheng and swahili what would that add up to?

>> No.10999705

>>10999408
>"thou" in "þu" stede
Ado ærest ut þone beam of þinum agenum eagan, and behawa þonne þæt þu ut-ado þæt mot of þines Cleetus' eagan.

>> No.10999707

>>10998991
TOP FUCKING KEK

Who would have guessed that /lit/ was the most retarded of all the boards