/lit/ - Literature

>>14465620
>guenonfag retroactively refutes himself

based! your quote misunderstands the meaning of "representation" in the kantian sense. for example, deleuze in difference and repetition concieves of the conception of difference in itself as existing and delineates its properties in great detail, on the condition that it isnt subject to the possibility of representation, which is something kant already does in the start of the transcendental analytic, in the first critique, and develops further in the second critique, with regards to moral agents. read Kant and stop being a dumbfuck