/lit/ - Literature

F

>>15996906
Why biocentrism won't survive singularity? After all, the merging between machine and nature could be a posibbility in the standards of technophiles, because it's a "usefull" solution to the envriomental problems.
> We need support for non-anthropocentric philosophy
I didn't understand what you are proposing here.

I think that any ideology who puts humans under something will inevitably lead to post-humanity, since it's not the main value that must be protected (imo anthropocentrism needs a deep ecology focus, since it's in the envrioment where humans can develop at it's natural and ideal way). Therefore, anthropocentrism should not be understanded as "everything within the parameters of human valutation", but what is better for humans and the nature, since both are strictly cojointed

>>15990461
Industrial Society and its Future. Strong redpill aspect in that it will change the way you see a large number of things despite being short enough to read and understand in a sitting or two.

reminder that ted is handsome and smart

>>13384958
he did his part in warning you of the future