/lit/ - Literature

>>15703927
It doesn't matter how many leaps in logic you do, nothing justifies having to submit at least one third of your life to the will of an all powerful rich asshole that you don't even know and doesn't give a fuck about you. Most of the time he doesn't even know what's really going down in the company, he's just a leech that receives most of the benefit. There's literal no reason for these parasites existing and if you defend their existence it's probably just because "but muh private property rights", "but... he had the initial idea!", "but, but he takes the risk!". So before you sperg out, let me get this straight, I'm not against creators getting an adequate compensation. I think creation in itself is labor too. What I don't like, and I think should be abolished, is your entitlement to profit off your creation indefinitely and, in the context of a company, the full authoritarian control you have over it. Investors should also get back the capital they put into a firm and then some for the risk they took, but they're not entitled to then own the firm if they do not work there. In short, I think that Bezos' levels of wealth are absolutely disgusting. You should keep working on your company if you want to keep getting the fruits of its value creation, and YOU should submit to the decisions of the people that actually make your idea work (see: the workers), not the other way around.

>>15404516
>being a centrist
cringe as fuck

>yes, I'm into the post-woke doomer-radical intellectuals, how did you know?

>>9525912
Nice

>>9401087

>>12008
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SioPbKVEoiY

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Union_at_the_Olympics