/lit/ - Literature

>>18830378
This is literally a much better strategy than everything else the Right is doing right now.

>>18603375
>invent a political philosophy saying democracy is fake and gay
>your followers join the cult of the fakest and gayest president ever
>and have a meltdown over him losing an election
Nrx has gone downhill a little bit in the last few years. Luckily Spandrell and Moldy himself weren't this dumb but some of them were nearing Q level idiocy.

Play me a song Curtis Mold, Curtis Mold
I got some bloggin' money, tune up your old prose
People say he was foolish, but them people are a fool
Cause Curtis Mold was the finest grifter
to never name the Jew


>Advertises a 5 part series for American Mind
>Claims to explain why academia, the media, and deep state powers are always seemingly of one accord
>Abandons the series as soon as he realizes that The Clear Pill: Part 6 of 5 must needs be the JQ.
>Moves on to substack to try and get people to pay 100 bucks a year to be spammed with really shitty poetry.

Surprise surprise, this one stays up.
>>17080153
>>/lit/thread/17080153

Give me one good reason why I should listen to someone of such physiognomy.

It's time.

>Modern Americans have enormous difficulty in grasping hierarchical social structures. We grew up steeped in "applied Christianity" pretty much the way the Hitler Youth grew up steeped in Hitler. The suggesting that slavery could ever be or have been, as Aristotle suggests, natural and healthy, is like suggesting to the Hitler Youth that it might be cool to make some Jewish friends… We think of the master-slave relationship as usually sick and twisted, and invariably adversarial. Parent-child relationships can be all three. But they are not normally so. If history (not to mention evolutionary biology) proves anything, it proves that humans fit into dominance-submission structures almost as easily as they fit into the nuclear family.

>It is in fact very difficult to argue that the War of Secession made anyone's life more pleasant, including that of the freed slaves. (Perhaps your best case would be for New York profiteers and Unitarian poets who produced homilies to war.) War destroyed the economy of the South. It brought poverty, disease and death… While material things are not everything, and the psychological impact of freedom was large and usually positive, you will find few slave narratives in which the late 1860s are remembered as days of wine and roses.

>I don't think the conversion of Southern slaves into Southern sharecroppers made anyone much freer, because it created few practical options for the people involved. Before, you were an agricultural laborer who worked on the same farm for your entire life; after, ditto.

>Why does individual administration work?When said individual is a douche, it doesn’t.There is no reliable formula for good management.But there are many reliable formulas for bad management.A better question is: why does management by committeenot work?

>Divided control of any human enterprise tends to fail because of a phenomenon generally known, around the office, aspolitics.Politics always emerges when management breaks down.An individual manager, with undivided control of some enterprise, can only succeed by making the enterprise succeed.Replace one manager with two—the unorthodox administrative design known as “two-in-a-box,” a disaster I personally have experienced—and either has a new way to succeed: making the other fail.The more cooks, the worse the broth.

>In every human endeavor outside government itself, undivided administration is well-known to produce optimal results.If Peet’s could beat Starbucks, Southwest JetBlue, or In-N-Out Mickey D’s, by adopting a “separation of powers” or a “constitution” or some other architecture of leadership by consensus, one of them would certainly have tried it.

Damn, he's got a point you know

>Anon, I've been following your posts on /lit/ and I must say, I am impressed with your intelligence and erudition
>How would you like to help me restore the West to its former glory?

Well? How do you respond?