/lit/ - Literature

This it the most ahrimanic thing ever conceived (so far)

Just let the machine think for you the 90% of the time when that is "good enough" - don't notice the other 10% of the time where your creative soul is supposed to be awake and guiding the automatic parts of the process. "The ship steers itself," no need for a helmsman, no need for transcendental unity of apperception, we're all just bundles of impulses, and an AI algorithm is a bundle of impulses with no helmsman too, wow what a fortuitous coincidence - let's meld ourselves with it! I used it ten or twelve times and got adequate results (as adjudged by a brainlet STEMlet redditor who rarely activates his soul or engages in creativity in the first place), therefore, QED, "it works." Now just plug it directly into my brain so the whole world can become a soup of free-floating "information bits" gliding past one another, like a soup of RNA with no cells or organisms. Let's all become porous with machines while machines are increasingly marketed as porous with us. There is definitely no intent behind this, don't worry, it's all just for the sake of your "convenience" - and by "your" we mean the lowest common denominator mouth-breathing illiterate monster your government prefers to you as its basic unit-citizen, because it's easier to control.

hijacking this thread to ask if Rudolf Steiner is actually any good or if he's just overrated fluff for hippies. if valuable, where should I start?