/lit/ - Literature

>>16313463
Stop projecting your own need for attention or inability to comprehend different ideologies. Contributing X while sharing something relevant to the thread doesn't equal approval seeking, but is used to confirm that a certain point of view is shared even by those negatively affected by it, thus making it more likely to be a universal truth.

>anon: retards shouldn't reproduce
>tardnon: As someone with a fucked up gen pool I myself wound't want to have kids, letting them suffer my own curse
>you: omg stop crying for attention from a bunch of [slure of the week]

>>15501308
Willst den Kommentar nicht auch lieber löschen, Sören?
Imagine having so little going on in your life that you shitpost up a thread about a century old childrens fairy book on a taiwanese pizza spelunking forum because someone used a bad word.

>>13996334
Pointing out flaws and biases is an integral part of making a educated judgment about a work. Works never stand on their own. Ignoring contemptorary politics is impossible and dismissing or even shaming the messangers of their biases is shamefull. Without political context or biases nearly no non-fictional book makes sense, as the author and we ourselves are consciously or subconsciously constantly molded by it. We can smell the tide coming long before we realise what it means.

So either engage the JQ anon with proper arguments or just ignore him instead of this sleezy and dishonest meme of "we all hate you, go away or I'll call those which do it for free!".

>>9858328
>chomsky
>western imperialism
>denial
You don't even try to hide your bias calling others charlatans, anon. Please try again.

>>8706831
I'm to drunk for his shit.
kys thb senpai desu