/lit/ - Literature

>>20228130
>Do you think people aren't capable of thinking
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Choice_architecture
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nudge_theory
They aren't.

>You can't call me abominable if you don't believe that good and bad things exist.
And you can't speak about a patient, suffering from perceiving demonic clowns, if you yourself aren't hallucinating demonic clowns.

>Then I learn from them. Experience helps.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolley_problem
What would you learn from a Trolley Problem? That killing one man is better than five via indirectly pressing a button?

>Now you're just thinking sloppily
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Descartes%27_Error
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misattribution_of_arousal
Your judgement is based on emotions. Emotions are heuristics.
Showing visual sense-perception heuristics is just more vivid and, thus, easier to show.

>>19901680
>then assumse everything is an algorithem because the brain is just like a computer really
>He also clearly doesn't understand biological systems
Do you?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Choice_architecture
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nudge_theory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecological_rationality
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heuristic
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroeconomics

You are a lot less complex than you ingratiate yourself to be, human.

>>19885916
>unconscious mental processes =\= thinking & decisions
Both are heuristics.

>thinking & decisions
Require emotions, btw. And I doubt that you deliberately decide what to feel.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Descartes%27_Error

>>18651736
>Man is the only rational creature,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heuristics_in_judgment_and_decision-making
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Choice_architecture
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nudge_theory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecological_rationality

Except not really.