/lit/ - Literature

>>14213638
>>14213681
>>14213729
>>14213733
It is ontologically false to say a cat is a dog for that is to ignore the distinctions of dissimilarity. It is ontologically false to reify superpositions of different distinctions of qualities of essences to be same just because one is generated from the other as the other returns to the one. It is ontologically false to conflate pure noetic unmanifest potential with the impure manifest kinetic expression. Just because there's intermediaries between all that depends on the One for there to even have a "many" doesn't mean the One as all is in the same ontological state as the One in One. The One in nothing expresses infinitude in the emptying of one into nothing. Nothing therefore is infinite, infinite is nothing, both are the one "pole" on the One that deludes in thinking that there's multitude of One and so that attribute is very much real because the One is absolute, the attributes are not. The infinite sees nothing and nothing sees infinite, but true wisdom sees the One and that wisdom of the One is what liberates the One in attribute return to the One in principle because there's distinctions of ontological states.