/lit/ - Literature

>i hover above you
>life pulled out your mouth
>i become you
>opening of the mouth
>unlawful possession
>jellyfish in cold sweat deep end
>hollow shell twitch disconnection
>pupils swell
>my entrance
>hijacked no questions asked
>stretch you on like latex mask
>my sigils your epitaph

On reading, "anti-philosophy":

All texts ARE Demiurgic in the sense that the sanctioned reading of all texts (!) mirrors the Phenomenal world, text itself being embedded in the abomination of "natural theology". Far from "connecting the dots" or "coinciding opposites", the Gnostic reading should be, first, a rejection of intertextual reading, for example, that something happened "from Kant to Hegel", that this constitutes an iterative process of revealing anything at all, and, second, a realization that it is this very reading which does everything that it accuses the pejoratively Protestant reading of: that texts have no meaning in intertextual reading, that, in not actually existing, the alleged process of revelation can accommodate any and every interpretation and is the perfect throne for one's solipsism, that the actuality sanctioning the text is its literal actuality, not the fantastic process. Texts not as shards involved in the breaking of the vessels but texts as vessels of breaking: each text contains its own opposite to such a degree that it constitutes something fatal to the illusion of "natural theology", more to the point that Protestantism is the only Western Metaphysics. This is, of course, most applicable to the Canonical Gospels, Jesus is simultaneously speaking about Yaldabaoth and the Monadic father.

>i hover above you
>life pulled out your mouth
>i become you
>opening of the mouth
>unlawful possession
>jellyfish in cold sweat deep end
>hollow shell twitch disconnection
>pupils swell
>my entrance
>hijacked no questions asked
>stretch you on like latex mask
>my sigils your epitaph

On reading, "anti-philosophy":

All texts ARE Demiurgic in the sense that the sanctioned reading of all texts (!) mirrors the Phenomenal world, text itself being embedded in the abomination of "natural theology". Far from "connecting the dots" or "coinciding opposites", the Gnostic reading should be, first, a rejection of intertextual reading, for example, that something happened "from Kant to Hegel", that this constitutes and iterative process of revealing anything at all, and, second, a realization that it is this very reading which does everything that it accuses the pejoratively Protestant reading of: that texts have no meaning in intertextual reading, that, in not actually existing, the alleged process of revelation can accommodate any and every interpretation and is the perfect throne for one's solipsism, that the actuality sanctioning the text is its literal actuality, not the fantastic process. Texts not as shards involved in the breaking of the vessels but texts as vessels of breaking: each text contains its own opposite to such a degree that it constitutes something fatal to the illusion of "natural theology", more to the point that Protestantism is the only Western Metaphysics. This is, of course, most applicable to the Canonical Gospels, Jesus is simultaneously speaking about Yaldabaoth and the Monadic father.