[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.23422445 [View]
File: 37 KB, 750x621, wife-by-income.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23422445

>>23422194
https://akarlin.com/making-it/

>> No.22846331 [View]
File: 37 KB, 750x621, wife-by-income.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22846331

https://www.unz.com/akarlin/making-it/

>To radically transform the world – to start influencing major areas of research, funding insurrectionist and irredentist movements, etc. – you really need to be in the $10B+ range.

>Bloomberg gives Soros wealth at $8B, but other sources peg it at closer to $25B. Musk of course is at ~$200B. He also has singularly big ambitions, such as Mars colonization, which will really require trillions.

>Sean McMeekin estimates that the Germans gave the Bolsheviks 50 million gold marks (=$1B today) which would confirm the point.

>Yes, you can strike lucky with more targeted spending (NRx/rationalist-sphere people make a big deal of “leverage”). But as with making money itself, you need both brains and luck to find that moonshot. German attempts to foment instability in Britain by way of Ireland failed.

>The LDNR exists in significant part thanks to the semi-private efforts of Konstantin Malofeev. Another example of money “well leveraged” (= producing real world results).

>But for every such effort, you have ten that involve throwing money into a hole. Bill Gates’ efforts to find the next African Einstein? Press X for doubt.

>Scattershot policy in which you fund many different groups and people in the expectation that some of them strike gold. This describes Jacob Schiff and Soros. But you do need a lot of money for that.

>You could have probably bumped up research in radical life extension forwards by at least a couple of years if you had invested hundreds of millions in it a decade ago. (Now the commercial private sector is taking it up, making it increasingly moot). But most billionaires didn’t get to be billionaires by throwing their money around on moonshots. They are spiritual normies. Musk and Soros, in their own ways, are not. But they’re the exception, not the rule.

>Anyhow, what I’m really getting at here is that there’s a big filter between the mere millionaires and the billionaires.

>> No.21796417 [View]
File: 37 KB, 750x621, wife-by-income.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21796417

>>21795930
>>21796104
https://www.unz.com/akarlin/making-it/

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]