/lit/ - Literature

>>11141030

You have no idea what you are talking about! Enlightenment? Progress? Higher truth? Why do you expect such things to exist if you claim nobody ever reached them? Why do you assume everyone else made mistakes and did not reach higher truth instead of thinking you are the only one left behind? How much philosophy and science have you read to be able to make such a wide generalization? What has literature to do with truth and learning? What is the "hint" you believe there IS?
Why do you post here if you are not able to articulate you thoughts in words? How could you give so many wrong answers to so many wrongs questions? How many chromosomes in excess do you have?

>>10797728

>current year
>believing matter is anything but a holographic projection of the hypostatic Intellect and that we don't actually live inside an illusory temporal projection of eternity created by the Anima Mundi

>>10725045

>reading for knowledge and not for fun

>>10715232

>taking anything on the internet seriously in 2018

>>10708064

Saying that something is wrong does not make it wrong, maybe add an argument next time. I have this: either my experience of the world or the world itself (assuming that my experience is right) seems to be ordered according to some laws, which therefore exist, either as forms of the intellect or as actual laws of the universe.

What I am arguing is that you can explain order only in the Platonic sense, and that there is no such thing as a self-ordered universe. Order is conceivable only as a rational unchanging structure supervening "matter" (here not taken as literal matter but as the greek "chora" - i.e. the unqualified chaos that comes to have qualities because it is channeled into a rational order).

Do you have a better explanation of order/the perception of order that goes outside platonic terms? Then please, teach me, wise man.

>>10708060

I offered a full argument in my following post, and a new one here, so you are invited, as the other anon, to offer an alternative explanation of why do we seem to experience order in the universe, or to face the fact that you may happen to be a retard yourself, blessed man.

>>10694920

>tries communism related reading group
>does not work in real life

>>10691176

>bible
>medieval

>>10664143

>uses the mathematical abstraction of "oneness" in order to distinguish one object from the other and call it "something"
>would just have the experience of indistinguishable blending of things if his mind was not capable of categorizing oneness and, as repetition of oneness, multiplicity and number
>calls it abstraction as if it was abstracted from things and not used in every moment of his life by his own mind to constitute experience