/lit/ - Literature

>>21337028
Thanks anon! I’ll definitely give this a read.

>>20376421
I'll never have a daughter. It literally is the ULTIMATE AND FINAL cuck. Also, in respect for my fellow fathers out there, I will NOT date their daughters.

Something that I did in order to figure out which branch of Christianity is correct was to learn each branch's theological and historical claims and then get in arguments with people online and see how well I could defend it. My results are as follows:

1. Confessional Protestantism (e.g. Reformed, Lutheran) -- this performs well against anti-intellectual branches of Protestantism, such as fundamentalists. It fails against heterodox groups like Anabaptists, as these groups will wantonly reject your definitions and terminology and arguing with them necessitates justifying everything with no prior traditional assumptions, which is beyond the scope of anyone who is not an expert. It fails to Orthodoxy on historical grounds and to Catholicism on the issue of authority.

2. Orthodoxy -- this destructs any form of Protestantism on a historical basis. However the reliance on this becomes a handicap when dealing with Catholicism, as you can no longer rely on generalizations and must wade into the mire of historical minutiae to justify the Great Schism. The arguments here become increasingly abstruse and reliant on mastery of the historical material. The issue of authority can also be brought to bear against Orthodoxy here.

3. Catholicism -- in argument with Protestants they will try to disprove Catholicism via scripture, and the intellectual branches (not the fundamentalists) can press you on some issues, but the problems of history and authority kneecap any Protestant argument from any position. I am not saying they will admit defeat to this, but it renders their systems unjustifiable. With Orthodoxy you have the arcane historical problem I already mentioned, but Catholicism can bring authority and unity to bear against this in a unique way that Orthodoxy can't. Catholicism effectively allows you to bypass the muck of most of these debates and strike at the heart of your opponent's system. It's the only one that can actually be defended well in any circumstance by a normal person, and is the ultimate victor of this exercise.

I use my own pronunciation of Latin that I made up.

Think of all those who ever were, back to the start of time. And me, transient as they, flickering out as well into their grey world. Like everything around me this solid world itself which they reared and lived in is dwindling and dissolving...

Think of all those who ever were, back to the start of time. And me, transient as they, flickering out as well into their grey world. Like everything around me this solid world itself which they reared and lived in is dwindling and dissolving...

>>19408035
>Schultz

Think of all those who ever were, back to the start of time. And me, transient as they, flickering out as well into their grey world. Like everything around me this solid world itself which they reared and lived in is dwindling and dissolving…