/lit/ - Literature

Reduce evolutionism to its simplest terms, and they always cry "you just dunn get it" or "that's a strawman". They mock theists for saying "Goddidit" but evolutionists do the exact same thing claiming "Evolutiondidit" and they don't even realize how their beliefs are religious in nature.

They literally claim our ancestor was a rock that came to life and that everything came from nothing. It's not even remotely logical or sensible.

>>22900887
>How do I refute materialism?
It's scientifically self-refuting. Go look up the Christian arguments against their religion and their creation myth of evolution if you want the many, many, many specific ways it's impossible and absurd.

>>22901036
That's because you cannot see.

>>22901870
Materialism cannot account for science.

>>22901914
It's the state religion, the materialists even have their own creation superstition they falsely call science and indoctrinate into kids in government schools.

>>22905739
>God, I really wish I could understand why people want to reject materialism.
lol, did you even read what you wrote?

Do you really wish to understand? It would seem you'd rather wish to preserve your beliefs at any expense. Rather than seeking to understand the arguments, you call on God for some reason then you claim you want to understand the people but you clearly don't as you have no intention to understand the arguments (or even hear them, for most of you brainwashed into the materialist state religion).

>>22910714
lmao, you're just indoctrinated into the state religion, one which makes good slaves who "trust the experts" and "trust the science", one where man is the supreme authority rather than God Almighty. All you did was recite mantras and baseless assertions.

You wouldn't even have modern science without Christians seeking to understand God's creation. There's no reason a materialist should think they could rationally study something that was irrationally made. But Christians understand the world is rationally made by a rational mind and can be rationally understood because God has given us a rational mind.

>>22911345
>Makes you wonder why absolutely no one who works on this stuff calls is "materialism" anymore. Materialism is a term used by the laity who don't understand the discussion or by people who are trying to slander materialism. Why did "materialism" get abandoned by materialists in favor of "physicalism?" Why did earlier "mechanism" get abandoned in favor of "materialism" before that?
Because the idiotic worldview is false and they need to keep moving goalposts and playing semantic games to keep deceiving people. They'll adapt one bit here or there (e.g. "inflation theory"), change the terminology, then act like anyone who doesn't use the latest cope terminology "just doesn't get it" (for not drinking the same koolaid).