/lit/ - Literature

>>20260709
Not really what you asked but reading Crowley's book four without reading all previous works + having a thorough understanding of the old testmemant would make for a very difficult and almost pointless read. Anyone who claims to gain any insight from book four alone is an unironic liar and retard.

The best starting points would be John Dee,
Éliphas Lévi and Helena Blavatsky, starting with these will provide the benefit of not having to unlearn modern pseud takes on the topic, as well as setting the foundation of what everyone else has ripped off and built upon over the years.

>>16626073
that's based desu

>>16159604
I tried reading Something Wicked but it was so shitty and boring I had to stop. Maybe his other books are good but I'm not even gonna bother.

>>15934209
All good. Thanks for all your occult posts.

https://youtu.be/7hmM7cV5rUE

>>15790102
>>15790207
>>15790331
based /x/ poster

>>15767782
anyone here ever read Jung's Aion? what did you think about the link between astrology and Christianity? shit's fucking bonkers but there does seem to be a correspondence between the two, the dawn of the age of Aquarius and the fall of Christianity as the fundamental myth of the West that is

>>15689970
this. there are some intellectual leftist types left who engage in debate and discussion, but unless you're a public intellectual you usually won't be engaging with those types. the people you'll be engaging with are religious zealots who worship at the alter of progressivism. "facts" are racist and "debate" is platforming racists and "conservatives" are nazis and "arguments" are justifying racism and "qualified speakers" have white privilege. they have relabled everything so that they have the moral high ground at all times. they don't want to debate you or defend their ideas, they want to beat you into ideological submission.

>>15641766
How do I get into occultism, /lit/?