[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.13839339 [View]
File: 14 KB, 293x468, 1545714280080.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13839339

Why the fuck did men decide to give women the right to vote?

>> No.12282976 [View]
File: 14 KB, 293x468, 1513873805646.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12282976

>>12282951
I just pretty much read Being & Time. I have no clue what's going on but I think I'm enjoying myself.

>> No.11234107 [View]
File: 14 KB, 293x468, 1495304324621.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11234107

>> No.11234091 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 14 KB, 293x468, heidegger.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11234091

>> No.10430942 [View]
File: 14 KB, 293x468, 1495304324621.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10430942

>>10430598
Plato wanted Parmenides and Heraclitus to live under the same roof, but their claims are contradictory, therefore he came up with a dualist metaphysics. Parmenides describes the eternal (God, number, forms, psyche which is since Socrates means both mind and soul) and Heraclitus the ever-changing nature (matter).

Thus Plato split the fucking world. Aristotle telling you to look for the forms in matter did not mend the schism, same with Kant and (the classical understanding of) the division between phenomenal and noumenal, hence the need for a phenomenology to provide an account for how our mind can understand and interact with this world of matter.

On top of that you have Being itself, which is the answer to the question: "What does it mean to be?", treated for two and a half millennia as just another being among its fellow beings, this guy called "the One" or "God", hence Heidegger pointing out the ontological difference and that Western philosophy shat all over itself with ontotheology.

>> No.10314114 [View]
File: 14 KB, 293x468, 1495304324621.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10314114

lmao stay mad Cartesian

>> No.9769133 [View]
File: 14 KB, 293x468, 1495304324621.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9769133

>>9769083
By introducing the ontological difference.

>Heidegger: What does the word "to be" mean?
>Western metaphysics: Bruuuuuh... it's like this huge entity, a being totally like you and I and this chair and baby seals, only bigger and more universal man, you can call it, uuuuuhhh... idea, energeia, substance, monad or will to power and so, yeah.
>Heidegger: 'no'

Read the rest of the article I just linked.

>> No.9534566 [View]
File: 14 KB, 293x468, 1495304324621.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9534566

Heidegger

>> No.9530642 [View]
File: 38 KB, 293x468, heidegger.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9530642

>> No.9523166 [View]
File: 38 KB, 293x468, heidegger.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9523166

Fresh OC, inspired by:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_causes#The_four_causes_in_technology_by_Heidegger
>Heidegger raises the questions of why just these four causes, how was it determined that they exclusively go together, what exactly unifies them and what makes causa finalis and causa efficiens different. These are important questions to analyze and attempt to answer or else the definition of technology will remain obscure.
Destruktion has the outstanding capacity of making you feel stupid.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]