/lit/ - Literature

>>21771202
The method of critique is genealogy. Difference and Repetition is ---on its surface--- a critique of Representation. But at the same time, it is a Critique of Thought. The outcome of the critique of thought is its genealogy: from non-conceptual difference to the genesis of thought.

The concept proper to Difference ---difference in itself--- needs to imply the three characteristics of non-conceptual difference (which is aesthetical difference = intensity): difference; disparity/distance; intensity. But once the concept of difference in itself is found, it is folded back to the Idea ---something that is a product of non-conceptual difference. Deleuze sure does a better dialectic that Hegel, but nonetheless its entire book goes like:

>lets do what kantians couldn't ever do because of the conceptual filter of intuition
>damn, we got difference prior to the concept of difference
>lets make as the concept of difference is the same as non-conceptual difference, and infuse Eidos with it so as to get individuation from within the Idea and not for conceptual derivation/partition.
>Yeah, philosophy is totally relevant now

Dude went all the way back to solve Kant just to go back to Hegel. What a waste.

tl;dr: Take everything DR says about Repetition and The Eternal Return and throw it to the trash.

AAAHH!!! NO!!! I'M GOING MAD

>>17931513
>18
>Colombia
>La bruja from German Castro Caycedo

Is that... a squid?
DOES IT HAVE TENTACLES?
OH MY GODDDDD

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH I'M GOING FUCKING INSANEEEEEE! AIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEE!

NIGGERMAN HELP ME! AHHHHHHHHH! THE MADNESS IS OVERTAKING ME! AHHHHHHHHH, MY MIND IS FALLING APART!

AIHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH