/lit/ - Literature

>>20756637
>None. Natural human languages are basically equal in this regard.
That's bullshit nigger. We did the math.

He would be correct in his assumption.

>>19178709
>shitty non-language pidgin is the most powerful language ever
Based English

>>19051842
The anima mundi resides in the English language and has for some time now. ESLs essentially operate on a lower level of consciousness than EFLs and are unable to truly appreciate the divine fruits that the language bears.

>it's another ESL cope thread
Today, I will remind them.

>>18517471
>devolve
>English
ESL cope

>>18468037
It's good that you know your place.

>it's another ESL cope thread

>>17698749

>another ESL cope thread

Feels good to be EFL, ngl.

>>17117883
>and is it a good thing?
You tell me

>>17038045
Based

Japanese is a low density information language.

It's like having an operating system in Flash, Java or HTML. Nothing all that great is going to come out of it and it is a very obtuse way of organizing things and takes about 5x the effort than say C#.

The language limitations of Japanese are why no great literature or philosophy have ever emerged from the continent. It is slow, inefficient and a poor means of conveying high IQ abstractions. The reason weebs are drawn to it is because they don't think about much other than hentia and anime. See what Bobby Fischer had to say about Japan.

The only commendable thing about the language is that it executed binaries very well. Immigration = bad for instance.

Damn it feels good being an Anglo sometimes.

>>16600904
Literature, philosophy and diplomacy simultaneously; also science, business and art.

A friendly reminder

>>16522302
English. Pic rel.

>>16243341
You're probably just not very good at speaking it

>>16206339
>I'm sure that you could find statistically significant differences if one were able to find useful metric.
We have some. Check pic-related.

I’ve seen this graph around and while English is the most efficient, I have doubts that it was always this way. When reading older texts (2+ centuries ago) the density seems to be drawn out and wordier with more fluff.

This might be my dismal education speaking though, but it seems that older texts have more variance in sentence construction, substituting subject for pronouns is so commonplace that subject almost gets lost, while modern English tends toward stricter SVO.

>>15206436
>>15206452
>>15206539
Blessed and based thread

>>14143857