/lit/ - Literature

>>14506277
>you aren’t allowed x

>>13812777
>your sources are biased gooooy! hehehe!
>here use wicked paedia instead! We moderate it thorooooughly hehehe!
Dont wait in line fuvking jump in the oven.

>how is this shit even legal?

>>10145303
Getting really sick of the "we"tards too.

>>9904416
>mfw a vitalist near me tries to pass as a badass when he can't even master """""life""""" and so has to waste his conscious time in misery because the "strong" should rule
Dance, monkey, dance.

>>9720004
>It's a biological imperative.

Evola simply couldn't get over (get it?) the fact that he was on the losing side. He had to spook himself into believing duty was everything and should be mantained at all costs even in order to not accept whatever values were (ironically) dominant at time--when he didn't even have to. He thought women were metaphysically supposed to be dominated but died familyless. He thought race was everything but didn't have an heir. He thought spirituality was only true in praxis but never succesfully set an Order or a praxis for others to follow. He had to come up with a fairytail in order to justify his racism, and he built it backwards, in a way in which it would (conveniently) unfalsicable because, of course, all we knew was already (necessarily) contaminated by this "filthy age". He's one big cop out.

Meanwhile, Stirner never said anyone should follow his philosophy. He wasn't desparate to be taken seriously like almost every other thinker. He didn't usurp some great ancestor's name, but took a pen name in order to avoid the law (which he did successfully). He correctly predicted the way milk should be distributed. He made Marx and Nietzsche shat their pants. It really doesn't matter whatever insults you throw at him (or others for that matter) because he destroyed any ground in which those insults could be taken seriously. Stirner came along, slapped philosophy in the face, and then tranquily kept strolling.

>to intelectually to exit voluntary celibacy

>>8622166
Of course.

>>8605528
lmao the spook

>>8496901
>serious non-fiction readers have a higher rate of success in jobs and life than fiction readers

>1845-1+72
>Putting humanness above yourself.
>Freeing yourself from the mind only to enslave yourself to the body.

I don't know but it's sure sounds spooky.

>>8176363
>nature has a plan
>servants of genes
K
Y
S

>>8156512
>Maybe if I throw more spooks at him he'll forget I throwed spooks at him!
It really is fine for you to be this way Anon. There's no shame in being compelled by common opinion, or your body, or your ideology, any kind of shame is only brought by the compelling of other ideas or concepts. I'm not being sarcastic or haughty, it's you folks that are striving to achieve something.

>>7994398
>for

>>7989276

>>7950682
>need

>mfw I see "left accelerationist" posts on my facebook

Stirner ended philosophy teebeehee ieemeehoooee

>>7890775
Stirner, Cioran, Schopenhauer

>>7883634
Underrated.

mein gott the spooks itt....
read stirner on love and be done with it