/lit/ - Literature

>>15265723
Bad manners.
Firstly, the question you originally set out to answer was "What is the true area of this square?". You now see that this question cannot be answered and you resort to alternatives, which is a good start.

Now, you are setting out to prove to me that the concept of truth is something we can interact with. The way you do this, is by taking an untruth, and saying that the statement "untruth is untruth" somehow represents your ability to interact with truth. You neglect to say that there are infinite untruths for a given situation, and only one truth. Therefore, approach by exclusion is pointless, and your argument is void.

Regarding your last question, again you're asking me why I'm asserting my opinion like it's the truth, while I argue that the concept of truth is useless. Yes, po-mo has a contradiction of using reason to debunk truth and by extension reason. But the universe is full of contradictions.