/lit/ - Literature

> [...] It is in this assessment of history that Austrians and Marxists agree and why a notable intellectual affinity between Austrian and Marxist historical investigations exists. Both oppose
a historiography that recognises only action or interaction, economically and
morally on a par; and both oppose a historiography that instead of adopting such
a value-neutral stand thinks that one's own arbitrarily introduced subjective value
judgements have to provide the foil for one's historical narratives. Rather, history
must be told in terms of freedom and exploitation, parasitism and economic
impoverishment, private property and its destruction-otherwise it is told falsely.
While productive enterprises come or go because of voluntary support or its
absence, a ruling class never comes to power because there is a demand for it,
nor does it abdicate when abdication is demonstrably demanded.

Libertarians have more in common with Marxists than with American conservatives

>>15581090
>>15581092

I got a book about that, should you be interested

essential literature for the advancement of mao zedong thought the 21st century?