[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.9930318 [View]
File: 89 KB, 440x598, 1340165491035.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9930318

Looking with any kind of scrutiny at the same threads and titles, it's pretty obvious that what some consider the intellectual body of 4chan i subject to an influence campaign.

The question "Should we stop reading White Male authors?" Immediately begs a "No." from your mind. Any/all pretense to a leftist opinion is only farcical in nature, imitated, and taken to the lengths of buffoonery in an effort to delegitimize the position. Your knee jerk psychological reaction to criticize a false opinion puts you in the exact frame of mind they want you to be. Think of it as a narrative mechanic, to get us to like or dislike any one character. Some say liberals create strawmen in arguments. Sure. But here, you will find only straw liberals.

I won't pretend to know who the primary agents of this campaign may be, probably a splinter of /pol/, but they're obviously effective if you've already begun to consider their notion of "in-line" thinking. I'll give them this, they're persistent sons of bitches.

>> No.6203615 [View]
File: 89 KB, 440x598, 1340165491035.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6203615

>>6203480

>thinking epigenetics makes people build different bridges, or have creativity.

If this were true, all the books you've read have less correlation to your creative capacity then the meals you've eaten over the past year. Behavior and the cancer you get can be molded by epigenetics, biut to put human ingenuity under its yoke is scientifically unfounded.

Please, if you're going to talk about biology, or attempt to correct or imply to someone on the subject, make sure you understand it.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]