[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.13639025 [View]
File: 255 KB, 650x625, 1519842812116.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13639025

>>13638946
>Ask queer people or women

"No"

>> No.13434905 [View]
File: 255 KB, 650x625, arnie thot destroyer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13434905

are books about arnie interesting? he seems like an interesting guy

>> No.12978207 [View]
File: 255 KB, 650x625, 1555808012468.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12978207

Depends on your definition of god. The leibnizian god that controls all the monads would btfo us all pretty fast( implying we could damage it).
The kantian god is impossible to understand and beyond experience, so I don't know.
Allah is the maintainer of all existence, like the aristotelian god and could just decide that you don't exist anymore. The biblical god is a bit weaker as he needed to rest after creating the universe, so a late stage kurzweilan civilasation could probaly put up a challenge. The berklian god would just stop thinking about you, and you would die. The god from the ontological argument is maximaly great and therefor unbeatable so this god wins. The god from the kalam cosmolgical argument could just destroy you by causing a new big bang. The god from the design argument depends is probaly beatable. The neoplatonic god, the aquinian god and the augustinian god would curbstomp any attempt. So any attempt by post-singulatarian societies would fail against most versions of god. Pantheistic gods would also be hard becuase you would need to destroy all of existence, which seem very hard, even if we colonoze the outerverse. I'll do a quick ranking:
1: God from the ontological argument (by definition), Neoplatonic god (beyond logic), Design argument god (wanked)
2: Allah, god in occasionalism, leibnizian god, berklyian god, augustinian god, thomist god, aristotelian god, Jehova, Biblical god, Brahman.
3: Kalam argument god, cosmological god. (could vary in strength, but if we say that they are acausal beings, then they are unbeatable).
4: Endgame wanked humanity (transhuman, singularitanism, the multiverse has been turned into a computer)
5: Paganism, Design argument god (lowballed, if god designed the laws of logic itself, then this god curbstomp the others, except for the neoplatonian), biblical god (lowballed)
?: Kantian god, Kierkegardian god
Shit tier: Nietszchean god (is dead)
The first row is beyond logic, and the second are omnipotent in the sense that they can do everything that is logicaly possible. 3 and down are just very powerful but could be defeated by, say Goku or something.

>> No.12973941 [View]
File: 255 KB, 650x625, 1519842812116.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12973941

>let's skip today's Metaphysics lecture

You just said the magic password to never have the honor of receiving my powerful lordly cum

Get out of my life, if I see you again I will attack you

>> No.12755043 [View]
File: 255 KB, 650x625, 1519842812116.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12755043

>>12755034
You would not survive the attempt

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]