/lit/ - Literature

>>18622654
Oh no no no

>I could care less
So care less. It's "COULDN'T" you illiterate American dunces. C. O. U. L. D. N. '. T. It's not fucking hard.

>>16354760
Imagine having no arguments at all

>>16150136
No you aren't. You're going to keep reading European books in terrible Anglo translations that suck ass no matter how "accurate" they are so you can larp on 4chan as an epic nationalist despite living in the United States and eating shit food and drinking toxic water every single day

>>15623377

>>15438950

His observations and criticisms are done from a purely American background. When I started reading him I like his caustic style of taking down liberal institutions, but lets face it, the guy has no fucking idea how interrelated governance is with the economic institutions. As a non-burger I was surprised by how much in his American world view he takes for granted, like for example the banking-finance aspect of the US the economy that props it up and gives it a supreme edge over all other economies. The real answer to him is to read how Breton-Woods came about and the resulting shift to the petrodollar. An analysis of institutions alone from an ethical or idealistic point of view without an analysis of finance capital is useless. Yet he tries to battle these institutions and props up the ideological idea of the Cathedral as a philosophical struggle. Ultimately his position is no different from the ancap perspective which shifts a struggle about the structure of economic institutions to a war of ideas on the level of rights. This is a supremely Anglo-Saxon worldview which for a non-Anglosphere person is useless. Maybe I am missing something , but in Europe we form our ideas historically and not from the level of ideal situations, but then again we never had a revolution like the American one.