/lit/ - Literature

>>18509431
>Only bacteria cultured in the petri dish can be dangerous
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

>>18314245
>You can't seek to destroy what is always naturally occurring
>Viruses are natural so you shouldn't even try to get rid of them.

>>13274359
>presupposing Christian morality
>conflating aesthetics and ethics
>no stated syllogisms; only an argument from morality

>>12970486
>However, if I know you are sucking dicks on daily basis, talk about sucking dicks frequently and read the works of the greatest dick-suckers in history, then I will be pretty right to call you a neo-dicksucker.
So you can label anybody if you can project with no evidence? I rest my case

>>12970491
In the real world trots and fabians are as influential as leftypol or bunkerchan. Fabians already lost control of the UK Labour Party.

>>12961603

>>12735984
>I don't think they were fond of that. And I don't think the the children that shared the same destiny were more emancipated that the one who didn't work.
Women didn't even fought to abolish work them but to fucking unionize.

>>12685726
Okay post-modernist

>>12685728
>All politics is identity politics
Only if you let it.

>>12679454
>the public/private dichotomy no longer exists.
Nuh uh?

>>12130702
>This is a formulation by association. I don't need a formal connection.
Which as I already said, it is not an argument that you can use. I even offered a counter point, that using your logic, environmentalism and strands of liberalism would be called marxism to point out how absurd your lining of reasoning is.

>>12030838
>they can even be moderators of socialist forums. These are the same people who call old-school socialists "brocialists" and who were mad when Mark Fisher exposed their imposture
Man this is yet another string of projections and assumptions that you have made up just so you can browbeat leftists ITT that you have yet to prove or back up this whole thread.

>What did you mean by this?
It is stupid to do so and stupid to assume other people are stupid so you can feel smug about it

>>11859771
>insofar as the establishment of non-rivalry will inherently prioritize women (because women are sexual gatekeepers).

>>11757807
>literally 99.99% of the world would agree that american liberals and european social democrats are leftists
Not even liberals associate themselves with leftists anymore. Look how is shitting on Corbyn 24/7

>>11690787
Lol just because you think his article's title are stupid doesn't make his opinion on Peterson wrong. Insulting him and me is not an arguement

>>11660348
So you are using your opinion as the basis for everyone's else opinion. Hell someone disagreed with you and you just brushed him aside.

>>11652361
all that moral posturing and no examples to show for it

>>10728418
I feel you anon, her poems have always bothered me and I think its because they're more about a visual art than they are verbal or actually poetic.

They feel rough, course, and unfinished to say with the syllables, sound notes, and etc.

They're always accompanied by a picture too, usually something vaguely minimalist that sort of captures the overall simplistic notes of the poem.

For example in the poem above, the second line the word "often" phonetically is so abrupt with the -ten- portion, just throws the entire liquid phonetics use of the poem off.

Its like shes whispering the entire time then she just slaps you in the face then goes back to whispering. And for what dramatic effect; the underlying of the fact she occurrence she speaks of happens a lot?

Like why not just use "much" instead. The -ch- blends way better with the previous -th- from "earth" and then you have this concurrent whisper mote following throughout.

Like I get it, aesthetics wise its beautiful, but surely we can do better than just visually appealing.