/lit/ - Literature

>>10753686

If you read anything other than meme tier novels you'll realize writing in aphorisms can be very interesting. Did you even read Wittgenstein?

>>10519270

There are many materialists who properly criticize capitalism, for it warrants criticism, plenty of it, even from its supposed defenders, yet people use communism as a scapegoat instead. And this can be done without necessarily advocating for communism. Perhaps you are conflating criticism of Capital with manifesting a will to establish communism. The two go hand in hand with Marx but not at all with most other authors, including the new wave of economists such as Piketty.

With that said, communism is easy to defend isn't it? You can ad-hoc implant literally any solution to any problem because Marx is a bastard child of Hegelian synthesis and we all know (if you don't read some Popper) how pseudo-scientific models of history have turned out up to this point.

>>10500248

You answered your own question mate. Life is still miserable if you sit just below enough to the top to be seen by the dominating caste.