/lit/ - Literature

>>14192648
>exactly 25
>rarely make threads but have made ones i already know answers to just to see discussion
>religious in terms of theological commitments, but very heterodox and not church-going
>proper way to learn a subject should include primary sources but not exclude secondary sources, both are important
>only say 'based' never say 'cringe'
I think I avoided the worst squares at least.
>if you don't get a bingo you have to explain why you're still here
Sometimes decent conversations happen between non-pseuds or people actually interested in learning. There's also no better alternative to this site.