/lit/ - Literature

two more weeks? or serious threat? what do you guys think? will ai replace authors, novelists, etc.? have any of you used ai for your writing?

>thread theme (created with ai btw):
https://youtu.be/vzAmxHAXVRQ?si=tOK2oNsyRjNLZX5-&t=31

Can't unsee now how storytelling is just DnD after starting to read the DnD dungeon master book.

>>21212263
I presumed you wanted to read the book, and I gave you a way. If you're unhappy with the manner in which you have to read it, no one is forcing you.

The book, is available, for free, on the internet though. And I plan to read it, it looks good. You can stew in your own ignorance.

>>17124092
What's your point, some surgical procedures are invasive even if they save the patient's life, and medical malpractice happens from time-to-time too. Are you suggesting they're torturing people for no reason, or that they should have been left alone? Who would be caring for these people if the religious didn't feel compelled to help them? Who would have freed the American slaves if New England Puritans weren't raising hell in Congress over something they thought was wrong thousands of miles away in unrelated states?

You probably have a handful of examples of bad things done by religious institutions or under the supervision of the religious, and choose to ignore the way it's organized civilization in an unmatched way, dragging what would otherwise have been 100,000,000 clans of chaotic retarded monkeys kicking and screaming into literacy, philosophy, scholarship, architecture, beauty and art.
Even in the Mother Teresa example, some people missing out on palliative care is worth the other thousands who died in dignity being cared for in a convent rather than in some hyperinferior slum.

IDK bro, just look at the scoreboard. It should be obvious. That's all I've got left to say.

>>14452766
hmmm it seems like the only downside in that statement was the part of getting stuck in a marriage

I guess instead of outlawing marriage we should just because bitter loveless assholes who "focus on science"

>>14368373
If you consider it fiction, then your goal has already been achieved.

Don't worry about what other people consider it. You are welcome for receiving my great wisdom.

>>12904309
It's easy to fuck with people who do this. You just ignore them. My mother and my wife both did it, they'd come in the room and yell at me about something or smash things and I'd just sit in my chair and watch and eventually they'd say their "final" line and storm off. Then I'd just go back to what I was doing.

Thing was, when the final word tactic doesn't work, they actually get stuck on repeat. They'd come back after a brief pause and actually do it all over again.

>You're still sitting there? I just told you that if you didn't stop playing video games, I was kicking you out. Now I'm going to call the cops.

Then they'd storm out of the room again, but they'd be back three or four more times with more ultimatums.

I sent a letter to a character from a book I liked a whole lot, but it came back return to sender. I don't think I have any more ideas for finding out what became of him. I guess, just burn the letter?

Lit feels thread

>be me
>forget to take a book with me when I commute to work
>must sit and do nothing for 30 minutes
>mfw

>that scene in Pounded in the Butt by my own Book, "Pounded in the Butt by my own Butt" where Chuck Tingle is pounded in the butt by his own book, "Pounded in the Butt by my own Book, "Pounded in the Butt by my own Butt""