/lit/ - Literature

>>16719609
>intuitionist logic
based and future oriented

I got a PhD in physics theory some years ago, but I went into tech - which I'm not extremely proud of but I do as much academic reading and hanging out with the academic crowd as possible


>You have to cite dozens of articles in your paper, they all have to be from the last 5 years or else you're called "outdated"
yikes

>ou study philosophy in order to become a professor, and you teach people who want to be professors.
You also study to get pussy. And if you're an extrovert, you can get political

>>16719690
>Philosophy shall either abandon the academia
How would that look like?
There's some rogue people on youtube right now, but inevitably, for 1 person who likes them, 100 will call them cringe. And they also end up hustling - since unless you're Witty or some other rich kid, you have to have commercial appeal

spooky greetings to Erikson

>>13934513
Because digital circuits still give us new tech and so it's not doubted enough

>>13934423
Pretty sure there were many You's back then you looked at Foucualt (sic) the same way you look at...Zizek or whoever.

Let's wait for their legacy once dead to judge.
Note that's it's not necessary that their texts will be read and interpreted as they meant them.
It's the people who formulated the extreme positions that get cited and, thus, remembered. Even if hundreds of other men in their respective decades said the first thing. Names get tied to concept and then remembered as if they created the opinions alone and against the grain.

>>13623965
Not sure if intentional but both Gödel and Hitler are Austrian.

Also, arithmetic is a theory like any other - it's just the most useful one.
In modular arithmetic, e.g. the ring of integers mod 12 (think of clock time), you have the 15=3. To say that 15 isn't 3 is a relative statement. It's just that artihmetic (as e.g. axiomized by Peano arithmetic) is our goto framework for reasons of practical usefulness. But that's arguably already a quite human-centric perspective.

>>13620270
We have no reason to believe arithmetic is inconsistent, in particular - if you admit induction up to some countable ordinals and formal recursive structures, then there's
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gentzen%27s_consistency_proof

>>13602378
I'm a /sci/ poster for 11 years now

>>>/sci/7684087

Sucess iss a forced meme, anything you want can be more easily achieved another way.

Problem is you have to start early.

You found it. Life is whatever now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=52&v=uLlN0kwN6Io