/lit/ - Literature

>>11764718
>But he hasn't?
Oh no, you are that contrarian retard. Put some effort into your trolling, every convo with you flows the same.
From a February interview with Sapkowski:

"Whilst not wanting to get involved in the development, in addition to providing the inspirational material, "The Witcher" saga has been adapted into a videogame series with great success. At this time, Netflix is in the process of pre-production of a series based in this saga. Are you involved in this project in any capacity?

In all adaptations, be it the first or the last, I am never involved in its development. From my viewpoint, the book is the book and the adaptation is the adaptation. Like Kipling said about the East and the West: "This is East and West is West, and the two will never meet". The adaptation and the original will never meet. The adaptation must be done by its adaptors. This is all I have to say about it because, as you might know, Netflix has signed a contract with me where it's explicitly listed that any information relative to the production I disclose will result in a severe financial penalty. Which is good for me because I do not know shit. So I cannot say anything.

So you're not involved in this production at all?

Absolutely. And it will always be so. Netflix has forgotten to include my personal opinion on the contract and my personal opinion is that I do not know, and will never want to know, anything about the production."

TL;DR - I ain't got nothin' to do with this catastrophe in making