[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.19557397 [View]
File: 181 KB, 1078x1228, life.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19557397

>>19557387
Not what I said at all.
I care for women not getting to reproduce. I care for birth rates being below 2.1 in Europe.
No I don't care about ugly men dying never having seen a pussy. Sure, the institute of marriage made it so that that was a rares occation in the last hundrets of years, but it's not actually that big of a deal, from a mental health perspective, as incels make it out to be. It's not too bad if some good man has babies with 4 women. Think about it.

>>19557394
Simp how

>> No.19431388 [View]
File: 181 KB, 1078x1228, life.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19431388

>>19431275
Starting Strength

>> No.13605313 [View]
File: 181 KB, 1078x1228, life.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13605313

- looking better makes likes life better
- nobody is "happy"

OP is cope. "I'm miserable because I'm not a Chad". That's a cheap excuse and you know it.

(Pic related undermines the point I'm making, but it tends to trigger robots and so I like to post it)

>> No.12571629 [View]
File: 181 KB, 1078x1228, life.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12571629

>> No.12168817 [View]
File: 181 KB, 1078x1228, life.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12168817

>>12166015
What is a "good artist" more than a good looking guy who's dominant enough to shill his own stuff?

>> No.7982218 [View]
File: 181 KB, 1078x1228, life.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7982218

>>7982202
I'm not a "Chad" (I have to work to get laid), but at least I don't think I can improve significantly w.r.t. to the "qualities" of bodies of girls I fucked before. In particular, I had a taller lean dancer gf with great looking B cups, who knew her sex appeal - which is incredible sexy in of itself.
I think whenever you have "access" to a girl for a month, it becomes routine and you don't appreciate it.
Still the idea persists that sex is an end of itself and one seeks better sex: So what happens? People (me) start to fetishising the Chad idea ("If I was an sex god ubermensch then sex with hot girls would actually be BETTER then the sex I have with the hot girls, because the girls animalistic desire would show more") or ideas of fucking several girls at once like you propose.
I posted in this thread before where I said that wanting sex is a desire we can't get rid off and while sex is good, this desire is mostly just a natural need. The ideas describe above are silly and just push the want for more further into the absurd - if I get a threesome with two hotties, I know that I'll still find something else to dream of. Pretty silly. I love the chill I get from a good philosophical insight just as much as I like the moment of cuming during sex. The former changes me more, you reflect on your character and grow. The latter is a great feeling but just something you do and that leaves you the same person.

>> No.7337833 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 181 KB, 1078x1228, 1447068553827.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7337833

>J-just r-read comrades...
>W-were all gunna make it ch-chums...

>> No.7334119 [View]
File: 181 KB, 1078x1228, life.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7334119

Some time ago there was a youtube thread and /lit/ recommended this guy,

now I see he uploaded a (very positive, so far) review of
>Submission - Michel Houellebecq
and he references a recent (positive) review by Knausgaard of the book.
(Who himself references À rebours by Huysmans.)

So I thought I make a thread and dump those links here and watch/read on.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8IBT9FkruS0

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/08/books/review/michel-houellebecqs-submission.html?_r=0

/lit/ seems less favorable of him, if I recall. Is it because they disregard the opinions expressed, or somehow because of the writing?

>> No.7044543 [View]
File: 181 KB, 1078x1228, robot hate troll.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7044543

>>7041048
That's contradictory.
If there are men who would fuck anything (and that's essentially a given, isn't it), then all girls are desired indeed.
The fact that hot girls have it easier than ugly girls doesn't change the fact that any girl can enter a male space (male sports, vidya community, hacker spaces, chess club) and gain attention and closedness from someone. Mr. neckbeard can't do that, he's disgusting to anyone.
Some of those, who are good at writing may write lone Hemmingway style books and then I understand the idea that only a man can feel the pain with them. And most kids today won't know war and hardship anyway, so it's not really a high horse they should step on.
The female problem is not getting the guy she want, but she can get -someone- to fall asleep next to her in any case. "The other woman has the man I desire - because she's better than me."
I don't think women are better off though tbh, because they have this shit-I'm-hitting-30-now-and-need-a-good-man-to-make-a-baby anxiety. I'd really love to read a literary work on that but from female authors I only know of fantasy books where some protagonist gets the perfect man.
The "I'm 35 and my lover won't dump his wife" story only every comes in the ward of comedy. Why is that the case anyway?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]