/lit/ - Literature

>>16284157
Its most likely due to his Black Notebooks becoming unconcealed (published).

And besides, I am reading Being and Time, but I don't plan to read the introduction to the book (maybe after I finished the book itself). I did my fair share of secondary literature: Dreyfus (texts and lectures), the lecturing of Plato's dialogues, some exerpts of Aristotle, Aquinas, Descartes and Kant, some Nietzsche and Kierkegaard, some of Heidegger's essays (On Metaphysics, On the Question Concerning Technology) etc. I even gave VeryShortIntroduction to Heidegger as >>16284106 anon recommended. Certainly, no shame in getting adequately prepared for Heidegger's heavier stuff. If we plan to deal with Heidegger's works, we must accept Heidegger's legacy as we recognize it to be. Nevertheless, the pretentious academics/journalists who accuse of being politically involved in NationalSocialist movements do not really wish to understand Heidegger to begin with. They are seeking depth in the shallowest of swamps.

I am currently on page 49 (28) of Being and Time. I am enjoying it very much. For me, this book is one of Homecoming (Nietzsche, TSZ, part 3):

>But here you are in your own home and house; here you can speak everything out and pour out all the reasons, nothing here is ashamed of obscure, obstinate feelings.

For Dasein to reach authenticity, it must recognize its temporal limits. Such unique experiences as reading "Being and Time" is the most authentic of my reading experiences. No "expert" can take it away with their redundant "missing the point" commentary on Heidegger's legacy. Do not tire, anon.
Enjoy reading Heidegger!

Pic: Heidegger and Gadamer

How about here, fellow Daseins?
What did Gadamer have to say to Heidegger while chucking wood?