/lit/ - Literature

>>14491235

>>11053088
>I like to read stories
Goethe
>I want to read philosophy
Kant
>I want to read Schopenhauer
Kant

>>10729319
>How come far left philosophy is much more prevalent than far right philosophy?
When you say far left, do you mean solely Marxists? Feminists/identity politics people? Anarchists? People like Chomsky? Left-wing (i.e actual) National Socialists? When you say far right, do you mean hypercapitalists? Fascists? Ethnonationalists? Far right and far left are used to describe anything that is not liberal capitalism. To answer your question though, it's because the far right typically already has their worldview for the most part expressed. What more can be said about the topics and principles laid down, besides how they might pragmatically be applied to a current society? The far left has no such luxury, and within the space of egalitarian and anti-egalitarian leftism there are so many competing standards and identities vying for power that works can be written from each of them individually. You won't get ahead in philosophy by rewriting Hobbes, no matter how accurate he might have been.
>You have exceptions like Heidegger and Schmitt
Heidegger was not "far right"; you are ignorant regarding National Socialism, which I would say is beyond right and left, though if I had to place it within those two, I would be characterize it as a radical leftist platform. The association of "nationalism" with the right-wing was not always the case; many of the European nationalist movements sought to unite with anyone who could understand the language of a nation and thus could gain similar values and culture.