/lit/ - Literature

>>22242182
The premise setup, the expectation of normality and the subversion of that expectation. Note this applies to jokes entirely, but can apply to funny stories. This is why most minority comics and writers are not very funny. You can look upon them and know exactly what is coming.

Does anybody know a means by which a man not in education can submit an unsolicited essay to a professor or academic for grading?

>>21703595
>Shit book
>wrong
Objectively it is shit, a good author displays his world-view via action and reaction. Heinlein has a author self-insert tell you his world-view for several pagee at a time.

>>Shit movie
>wrong
The movie is entertaining and enjoyable but an adaptation it is utterly shit. It was not a parody or a commentaty on Fascism until after the maker was heavily criticized for it.

>>Great animated series
>right
You, the broken clock could of been right twice a day but you are a 24h clock so you are only correct once.

>>Shit sequels
>filtered. back to plebbit.
You are not even aware of how many sequels exist, or who stars in them. Further highlighting the madness of calling them SST or in amy way basing any of them on a single, boring book.

>>Shit tie-in media
>not sure what you mean by that. comics? board games? the comics are ok
Are all shit.
>>Shit video games
>its a low budget franchise. what do you expect.
Low budhet games usually make up with it by including unique game play or innovation somewhere. SST games are a quick cash-in.

>>It is a great irony that all the associated media has nothing to do with the book and is all based off a b-movie that a lefty-hollywood producer made to parody the right and Fascism.
>The movies and other media all take ideas from the book.
No, they are not from the book. They are what a man who looks at the front cover and assumes is in the book. Everything featured in the book is destroyed so much as to be rendered unrecognizable in the book.

>>Justifying it that he just skimmed the source material. That the most famous character in thr movie does not exist at all in the book.
>rico is in the book. additionally while verhoven did not read the whole book neumeier did.
Rico in no way recognizes his depiction in the book. His teacher too ,as depicted bt Ironside, does not exist at all like that in the book. Every character is utterly destroyed in moving from book to movie.

>all in all you sound like a mouth breather who takes moorcocks inane rants seriously
Moorcocks political opinions are garbage but, he depicts them in his writings in a great way. There is no long, boring pages where he explains like Heinlein his political views they are acted out like, like an author should. Show, not tell.

>t. National-Socialist

>>21696120
>This includes Book requests
Do you have any scans of any obscure National-Socialist writers or their supporters?

>>21640342
Objectively the worst whisky one can buy. It is literal diabetic piss. Buy an Islay whisky and some Perdomo cigars.

>>21637328
That is objectively the correct take anon. Rape, abortion, drug abuse, violence, murder, prostituion and more are all that await anybody that falls under their purview. The military has a terrible, terrible problem with gay-rape, the dreaded reign of the grandfathers. This began when Stalin offered the gulag inmates freedom if they fought in the war, only he betrayed them. They are the lowest people in the entire northern hemisphere. You honestly think beauty can thrive in such a nation?

The correct position is neither, but a third option that puts Europeans and their nations first.

>>21610270
Where did you get this from? I don't recognize anything you have said but vague terms that were used in his English translation. The friend-foe distinction is the means by which the State uses to legitmize a decision and course of action. It is not at all as you have outlined at all. If a State, which is the outward expression of a single ethnic group of people is unable to deciede this then it has rendered itself illegitamate and needs replaced with one that has legitmacy.

>>21606324
By asking her if she to study with you. The only solution to fantasy is to pursue action that either negates their possibility or brings them to fruition.

Text her now, ask her now and ask her to study with you anon. Wear cologne and anti-perspirant.

Good luck, anon. We shall await pleased results.

>>21596862
Aristocracy meant leadership, that was it. Leading and forging a way for society to follow. It is not intelligence, wealth, ability, beauty, blood or spirit though all of them can and should overlap with leadership/statesman (that is without trickety, coercion and deal making) qualities but they in and of themselves are not sufficient.

It is tiring reading all of this, it is like minorities trying to justify why their carved and painted rocks are just as good as a European cathedral.

>>21575865
Because debate, discussion and counterpoints can not be argued by yourself. Sure I can read the text, understand it but there will always be things i miss. Having a group of people to debate and discuss the subject matter with seems to be the most engaging way to learn more of a text. The added benefit of CC is i am reliably told that it is now normally populated by those who want to be there, not those who are expected to be there. So perhaps the quality of people is improved. This will also be in a small town, almost entirely white town.

>>21575878
I am not familiar with the reputation of St Johns, what would this entail? It sounds very much what I am pursuing, id even help support such a venture financially.

>>21566827
>. To those saying everything is political, somehow /lit/ was able to do fine discussing literature without politics for over a decade.

Stop lying. There has always been dicussion of political systems in the context of the books that outline them. That is tantamount the rules on /tg/ saying talk about ttrpg but dont mention any of the supplementaty media. Every board has stuff that i adjacent to the central theme, /k/ has outdoor innawoods stuff and military and history, /fit/ has beauty, health and all sorts.

You keep trying to tease out what is you don't like. It is not the shitposting but only a small subgroup of shitposting that reflects what you do not like.

>>21566854
Im rarely off topic and don't shitpost much.

>>21534758
Download them online and take them to a self service office supply store, print them and for cents a page. Pay cash or use gift cards.

>>21534745
Great list

>>21534734
>>21534702
This list strikes me as subversion, i can spot no books of those who lived under National-Socialism. It would be like asking for books on Communism and omitting all of Marx, Lenin and Engels. Curious, why is that?

>>21510352
What are you talking about? I have been able to improve my life tremdously by altering my diet and lifestyle. I am stronger, healthier, more active, better able to focus far more easily. Further, my memory, my ability to problem solve and speed at which i process information have all improved remarkably.

All because of diet and lifestyle. Try it, see what improvements you can make.

>>21503317

>If your definition of right-wing is something like: "agrees near universally with Schmitt", then I am not that.

No, but 'Right Wing' would be agrees with many of his values and the means by which society should be arranged. Undemocratic and with less focus on decision by commitee and building concensus and more with authority and responsibility.

>I do not think any individual can really judge "quality" objectively
Most things can not be, because their are too many variables to measure with terms like good/bad. Beauty? That can easily be measured. Truth? Also can be measured. If this fiction vs that fiction is to be judged it needs to be done in specitic and objective terms, not vague subjective ones like pleasant, enjoyable or fun.

Quality is a vague term, it needs a qualifier. The quality of what? The quality of the exploration of human behavior and psycholpgy? The quality of the dialoge? You compare apples to oranges.

>Personally, I like Jack London. I think his novels are well-written and deserved their popularity even though I do not agree with his sometimes negrophilic views? Can that be called quality?
I like Moorcocks work, deplore is libertarian mindset and his no gods, no masters philosophy he has placed in the works. They are written to my liking but that is not an objective assessment, some things can not be measured objectively but some important things can.

>It's success indicates that there is something deeply rooted.
No, it does not. The entire free market/international market system is hitting crash after crash. It is the most fragile we have ever seen it right now and promises to get weaker. This is not fundemental nor deeply rooted.

Bad take. Except for the Judaized comment, they have installed themselves by chance or design in to many key decision making positions in the creative industries and so have an undue amount of influence over what is released. But, people are waking up to this and i am pleased to see the turn against them.

>>21497389
>Conservatism is basically "don't experiment
No. It is not. The only society that could be vagely called Conservative is Japan and that comes from an entirely differeny World-View that has never known Christianity. Conservatism is empty. What you call 'Don't experiment' is better and more accurately described as 'Don't destroy what we have on the promise of making something better'.

That comes from Europeans, Eastern Europe had to he forced in to Communism under Asianic/Russian/Jewish. This lack of foresight is directly corrolated with the amount of non-whites a nation has.

More white europeans = less risk in any experiment less and less chance of involuntary destruction in transitioning from one system to another.
Less white europeans = more risk of death simply going to buy milk and eggs.

>>21491393
Books can not do what you are asking. Is it possible you have failed to achieve commonplace life goals and are experiencing severe regret over your life choices? It so you are the male version of the 40 year old woman who froze her eggs to focus on her career and now realized that was a terrible mistake.

I have not read any of the replies, but since you mention your parents but not a family you have created it leads me to think this. I doubt any of the books recommended here will help. They are no better than the articles women read that explain why they are happy they never had a family, at best they are a cope and do not address the root of the issue. That you have nothing in this world after you die. A long family line will end with you.

Fix that, there is still 10 years before no-hope sets in when you strike 40 and fail to achieve even more common goals.

Hope this helps you anon.

>>21468340
>Difficult thing to be wise about
You keep making obtuse remarks about wisdom and knowledge. As if there is always a better path and that calm, rational discourse is always superior. Am i correct in that is your world-view?

>>21419235
>>21419238

Why? Trips are for fags

>>21229961
>>21229973
>>21229983

I notice there is no real refutation in this thread or the other. I must assume OP is a hippy, queer and a coward.

>>21050675
No, it does not at all you kike.

It comes under fire for thinking that the german Special Path, Sonderweg, played a greater part. That the numerous scandals involving Jewish (and other) peoples, both economical and polticial hardened polticial opinion. That the many attempted Marxist/Communist takeovers in Germany, some succesful, that were led mainly led by Jews. That the very real genesis of the stab-in-the-back, while not exclusively jews were overrepresented in jews caused German's surrender all played a substantial role in the formation of the National Socialist State, among other things.

>>21046833
There are no right-wing authors, all of them reject hierarchy, embrace some form of liberalism and conservatism and have no convictions with which are outside the Overton window. Even on hot issues.

>immigration/demographic replacement so long as it LEGAL demographic replacement. I am a Republican after all
>Trans issues, oh yeah that is fine so long as it is an ADULT MALE trying to be a woman, not children. I mean, i am a Conservative.

If there is a right-wing author that is not just a Peterson/Shapiro id be willing to check them out.

>>21033059
>I wish you the best
Thank you.

>I certainly agree with your first and last point.
That would suggest to me that my examples are what you disagree with?

>>21033073
I have no sense of where you are drawing your argument from. I suspect by your crudeness you wish to redefine masculinity in a way that would include whatevee wild, childish behavior you spent 8 hours a day engaged in.

>>21021981
>>21022030
>Embrace a life of contest, struggle with the greatest rewards to be gained
>Literally one of the core values of National-Socialism

>>20998299
It may just yet prove to be eschatological. I can't imagine a better world-view than National-Socialism that , once adopted, unifies a nation and exhaults the people and land and the improvement thereof as their highest goal.

It can not be eschatological because it is a continuous goal, unlike Marxism where it simply destroy X, private property or heirarchy. The goal of National-Socialism is contined improvement and worthy struggle over what came before. In ability, scope and beauty.